<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3537661746273509063</id><updated>2011-04-21T13:36:07.912-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Hazadorous Material Moving!</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://trashinyourbackyard-photobill.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3537661746273509063/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trashinyourbackyard-photobill.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>photobill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06302363142207402191</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3537661746273509063.post-6753546737036139116</id><published>2008-03-12T09:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-03-19T08:40:04.343-07:00</updated><title type='text'>PARKLAND OUT, Pesticides Come AS SECRETARY OF DNREC created Dump!: With all the Warnings of this Dump causing health problem, including cancer, Secretary Hughes has to be removed?</title><content type='html'>&lt;blockquote&gt;http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys_web.report             &lt;/blockquote&gt;  How about Nitrates from fertiliation: Gardens, grass, bushes: cut and past in your address bar to learn more: http://extoxnet.orst.edu/faqs/safedrink/nitrates.htm&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3537661746273509063-6753546737036139116?l=trashinyourbackyard-photobill.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://trashinyourbackyard-photobill.blogspot.com/feeds/6753546737036139116/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3537661746273509063&amp;postID=6753546737036139116' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3537661746273509063/posts/default/6753546737036139116'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3537661746273509063/posts/default/6753546737036139116'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trashinyourbackyard-photobill.blogspot.com/2008/03/parkland-out-pesticides-come-as_12.html' title='PARKLAND OUT, Pesticides Come AS SECRETARY OF DNREC created Dump!: With all the Warnings of this Dump causing health problem, including cancer, Secretary Hughes has to be removed?'/><author><name>photobill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06302363142207402191</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3537661746273509063.post-5238258862722789220</id><published>2008-03-12T09:41:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-03-12T09:41:39.086-07:00</updated><title type='text'>PARKLAND OUT, Pesticides Come AS SECRETARY OF DNREC created Dump!: With all the Warnings of this Dump causing health problem, including cancer, Secretary Hughes has to be removed?</title><content type='html'>EPA ListesSites in 19809&lt;br /&gt;http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys_web.report&lt;a href="http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys_web.report"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3537661746273509063-5238258862722789220?l=trashinyourbackyard-photobill.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://trashinyourbackyard.blogspot.com/2008/02/water-problems-plague-delaware-wells.html#links' title='PARKLAND OUT, Pesticides Come AS SECRETARY OF DNREC created Dump!: With all the Warnings of this Dump causing health problem, including cancer, Secretary Hughes has to be removed?'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://trashinyourbackyard-photobill.blogspot.com/feeds/5238258862722789220/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3537661746273509063&amp;postID=5238258862722789220' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3537661746273509063/posts/default/5238258862722789220'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3537661746273509063/posts/default/5238258862722789220'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trashinyourbackyard-photobill.blogspot.com/2008/03/parkland-out-pesticides-come-as.html' title='PARKLAND OUT, Pesticides Come AS SECRETARY OF DNREC created Dump!: With all the Warnings of this Dump causing health problem, including cancer, Secretary Hughes has to be removed?'/><author><name>photobill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06302363142207402191</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3537661746273509063.post-6745297590842407432</id><published>2008-03-06T07:48:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-03-08T13:18:03.403-08:00</updated><title type='text'>"WHAT'S IN YOUR DRINKING WATER"?</title><content type='html'>Place this link into your address bar if you want to know "What's In Your Water": look for Red Clay Creek that where most of NortH Wilmington Drinking Water Comes From!If you have a pool chlorine test kit use it today, heavy rains usually spike the Dosage of Chlorine (Bleach) that'sut in your drinking water.&lt;br /&gt;By keeping a gallon in your refrigerator, the chlorine will be gone by tomorrow, but the other toxins you will be crinking!!!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.fw.delaware.gov/Fisheries/Pages/Advisories.aspx&lt;br /&gt;Click on: 2007 Fish Consumption Advisories Chart, it tells you what in the water!!&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3537661746273509063-6745297590842407432?l=trashinyourbackyard-photobill.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://trashinyourbackyard-photobill.blogspot.com/feeds/6745297590842407432/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3537661746273509063&amp;postID=6745297590842407432' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3537661746273509063/posts/default/6745297590842407432'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3537661746273509063/posts/default/6745297590842407432'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trashinyourbackyard-photobill.blogspot.com/2008/03/1-2007-delaware-fish-consumption.html' title='&quot;WHAT&apos;S IN YOUR DRINKING WATER&quot;?'/><author><name>photobill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06302363142207402191</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3537661746273509063.post-7317256750802431660</id><published>2008-02-28T12:26:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-03-04T10:18:53.843-08:00</updated><title type='text'>DIAZINON, It's every where decaying leaves and trees and grass clippings are:</title><content type='html'>DRAFT EPA&lt;br /&gt;DRAFT AMBIENT AQUATIC LIFE WATER QUALITY CRITERIA&lt;br /&gt;DIAZINON&lt;br /&gt;Prepared by&lt;br /&gt;University of Wisconsin-Superior&lt;br /&gt;Superior, Wisconsin 54880&lt;br /&gt;andGreat Lakes Environmental Center&lt;br /&gt;Traverse City, Michigan 49686&lt;br /&gt;Prepared forU.S. Environmental Protection Agency&lt;br /&gt;Office of Water Office of Science and Technology&lt;br /&gt;Health and Ecological Criteria Division Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;Office of Research and Development National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratories Duluth, Minnesota&lt;br /&gt;Narragansett, Rhode Island&lt;br /&gt;EPA Contract No. 68-C-98-134&lt;br /&gt;Work Assignment No. 1-22&lt;br /&gt;DRAFT&lt;br /&gt;DRAFT AMBIENT AQUATIC LIFE WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR&lt;br /&gt;DIAZINON&lt;br /&gt;(CAS Registry Number 333-41-5)&lt;br /&gt;August 2000&lt;br /&gt;U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY&lt;br /&gt;OFFICE OF WATER&lt;br /&gt;OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY&lt;br /&gt;HEALTH AND ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA DIVISION&lt;br /&gt;WASHINGTON, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT&lt;br /&gt;NATIONAL HEALTH AND ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS RESEARCH LABORATORIES&lt;br /&gt;DULUTH, MINNESOTA&lt;br /&gt;NARRAGANSETT, RHODE ISLAND&lt;br /&gt;NOTICES&lt;br /&gt;ii&lt;br /&gt;This document has been reviewed by the Health and Ecological Effects Criteria&lt;br /&gt;Division, Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Environmental Protection&lt;br /&gt;Agency, and approved for publication.&lt;br /&gt;Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement&lt;br /&gt;or recommendation for use.&lt;br /&gt;This document is available to the public through the National Technical&lt;br /&gt;Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.&lt;br /&gt;iii&lt;br /&gt;FOREWORD&lt;br /&gt;Section 304(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (P.L. 95-217) requires&lt;br /&gt;the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to publish water&lt;br /&gt;quality criteria that accurately reflect the latest scientific knowledge on&lt;br /&gt;the kind and extent of all identifiable effects on health and welfare which&lt;br /&gt;might be expected from the presence of pollutants in any body of water,&lt;br /&gt;including ground water. This document is a revision of proposed criteria&lt;br /&gt;based upon consideration of comments received from EPA staff and independent&lt;br /&gt;peer reviewers. Criteria contained in this document replace any previously&lt;br /&gt;published EPA aquatic life criteria for the same pollutant(s).&lt;br /&gt;The term "water quality criteria" is used in two sections of the Clean&lt;br /&gt;Water Act, section 304(a)(1) and section 303(c)(2). The term has a different&lt;br /&gt;program impact in each section. In section 304, the term represents a nonregulatory,&lt;br /&gt;scientific assessment of ecological effects. Criteria presented&lt;br /&gt;in this document are such scientific assessments. If water quality criteria&lt;br /&gt;associated with specific stream uses are adopted by a state as water quality&lt;br /&gt;standards under section 303, they become enforceable maximum acceptable&lt;br /&gt;pollutant concentrations in ambient waters within that state. Water quality&lt;br /&gt;criteria adopted in state water quality standards could have the same&lt;br /&gt;numerical values as criteria developed under section 304. However, in many&lt;br /&gt;situations states might want to adjust water quality criteria developed under&lt;br /&gt;section 304 to reflect local environmental conditions and human exposure&lt;br /&gt;patterns. Alternatively, states may use different data and assumptions than&lt;br /&gt;EPA in deriving numeric criteria that are scientifically defensible and&lt;br /&gt;protective of designated uses. It is not until their adoption as part of&lt;br /&gt;state water quality standards that criteria become regulatory. Guidelines to&lt;br /&gt;assist the states and Indian tribes in modifying the criteria presented in&lt;br /&gt;this document are contained in the Water Quality Standards Handbook (U.S. EPA&lt;br /&gt;1994). This handbook and additional guidance on the development of water&lt;br /&gt;quality standards and other water-related programs of this agency have been&lt;br /&gt;developed by the Office of Water.&lt;br /&gt;This final document is guidance only. It does not establish or affect&lt;br /&gt;legal rights or obligations. It does not establish a binding norm and cannot&lt;br /&gt;be finally determinative of the issues addressed. Agency decisions in any&lt;br /&gt;particular situation will be made by applying the Clean Water Act and EPA&lt;br /&gt;regulations on the basis of specific facts presented and scientific&lt;br /&gt;information then available.&lt;br /&gt;Geoffrey H. Grubbs&lt;br /&gt;Director&lt;br /&gt;Office of Science and Technology&lt;br /&gt;iv&lt;br /&gt;ACKNOWLEDGMENTS&lt;br /&gt;Larry T. Brooke&lt;br /&gt;(author)&lt;br /&gt;University of Wisconsin-Superior&lt;br /&gt;Superior, Wisconsin&lt;br /&gt;Gregory J. Smith&lt;br /&gt;(author)&lt;br /&gt;Great Lakes Environmental Center&lt;br /&gt;Columbus, Ohio&lt;br /&gt;Heidi Bell&lt;br /&gt;(document coordinator)&lt;br /&gt;U.S. EPA&lt;br /&gt;Health and Ecological&lt;br /&gt;Criteria Division&lt;br /&gt;Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;v&lt;br /&gt;CONTENTS&lt;br /&gt;Page&lt;br /&gt;Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii&lt;br /&gt;Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv&lt;br /&gt;Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi&lt;br /&gt;Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi&lt;br /&gt;Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1&lt;br /&gt;Acute Toxicity to Aquatic Animals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5&lt;br /&gt;Chronic Toxicity to Aquatic Animals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7&lt;br /&gt;Toxicity to Aquatic Plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11&lt;br /&gt;Bioaccumulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12&lt;br /&gt;Other Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12&lt;br /&gt;Unused Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17&lt;br /&gt;Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20&lt;br /&gt;National Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21&lt;br /&gt;Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22&lt;br /&gt;References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54&lt;br /&gt;vi&lt;br /&gt;TABLES&lt;br /&gt;Page&lt;br /&gt;1. Acute Toxicity of Diazinon to Aquatic Animals . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27&lt;br /&gt;2. Chronic Toxicity of Diazinon to Aquatic Animals . . . . . . . . . . . . 34&lt;br /&gt;3. Ranked Genus Mean Acute Values with Species Mean Acute-&lt;br /&gt;Chronic Ratios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36&lt;br /&gt;4. Toxicity of Diazinon to Aquatic Plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40&lt;br /&gt;5. Bioaccumulation of Diazinon by Aquatic Organisms . . . . . . . . . . . 41&lt;br /&gt;6. Other Data on Effects of Diazinon on Aquatic Organisms . . . . . . . . 42&lt;br /&gt;FIGURES&lt;br /&gt;1. Ranked Summary of Diazinon GMAVs (Freshwater) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24&lt;br /&gt;2. Ranked Summary of Diazinon GMAVs (Saltwater) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25&lt;br /&gt;3. Chronic Toxicity of Diazinon to Aquatic Animals . . . . . . . . . . . . 26&lt;br /&gt;1&lt;br /&gt;Introduction&lt;br /&gt;Diazinon [Chemical Abstract Service registry number 333-41-5; 0,0-diethyl&lt;br /&gt;0-(6-methyl-2-{1-methylethyl}-4-pirimidinyl) phosphorothioate is a broad&lt;br /&gt;spectrum insecticide effective against adult and juvenile forms of flying&lt;br /&gt;insects, crawling insects, acarians and spiders (WHO 1998). Specific uses&lt;br /&gt;include the control of soil insects such as cutworms, wireworms, and maggots&lt;br /&gt;(Farm Chemicals Handbook 2000) and ectoparasites on sheep (Virtue and Clayton&lt;br /&gt;1997). It is also effective against many pests of fruits, vegetables,&lt;br /&gt;tobacco, forage, field crops, range, pasture, grasslands and ornamentals.&lt;br /&gt;Diazinon is routinely applied to the Central, Imperial and San Joaquin Valley&lt;br /&gt;agricultural areas of California (Bailey et al. 2000; Domagalski et al. 1997).&lt;br /&gt;It is used extensively around households to control cockroaches, and other&lt;br /&gt;insects such as flies (Farm Chemicals Handbook 2000) and ectoparasites on pets&lt;br /&gt;(Bailey et al. 2000). Additional diazinon uses in urban areas include dormant&lt;br /&gt;sprays on fruit trees, professional landscape and maintenance, and structural&lt;br /&gt;pest control (Bailey et al. 2000)&lt;br /&gt;Diazinon is an organo-phosphorus compound with the empirical formula of&lt;br /&gt;C12H21N2O3PS, a molecular weight of 304.35 and has an octanol/water partition&lt;br /&gt;coefficient (log Pow) of 3.40 (Hunter et al. 1985; WHO 1998). It is a&lt;br /&gt;colorless oil in its purest form with a density greater than water (1.116-&lt;br /&gt;1.118 g/mL at 20°C) and is soluble in water at 20°C to 0.006 percent (40 mg/L,&lt;br /&gt;Farm Chemicals Handbook 2000; 40.5 mg/L, Kanazawa 1983b; 60 mg/L, WHO 1998).&lt;br /&gt;The technical product is a pale to dark brown liquid of at least 90 percent&lt;br /&gt;purity and has a faint ester-like odor. It decomposes above 120°C&lt;br /&gt;(Verschueren 1983, WHO 1998), is susceptible to oxidation above 100°C, is&lt;br /&gt;stable in neutral media, but slowly hydrolyses in alkaline media and more&lt;br /&gt;rapidly in acidic media (WHO 1998). If stored properly, diazinon has a shelflife&lt;br /&gt;of at least three years (SOLARIS Consumer Affairs for Ortho products,&lt;br /&gt;P.O. Box 5008, San Ramos, CA 94583, 1998).&lt;br /&gt;Commercial formulations of diazinon contain the impurity sulfotepp&lt;br /&gt;(0,0,0,0-tetraethyl dithiopyrophosphate), which has been found at levels&lt;br /&gt;ranging from 0.20 to 0.71 percent of the diazinon concentrations (Meier et al.&lt;br /&gt;1979). Meier et al. (1979) compared the toxicity of sulfotepp and diazinon to&lt;br /&gt;four species of freshwater organisms and found sulfotepp 58 times more toxic&lt;br /&gt;to fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas), 75 times more toxic to bluegill&lt;br /&gt;(Lepomis macrochirus) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and 8.7 times&lt;br /&gt;more toxic to a cladoceran (Daphnia magna). The authors speculated that some&lt;br /&gt;of the toxicity attributed to diazinon is likely due to sulfotepp. Sulfotepp&lt;br /&gt;is more stable than diazinon and therefore should persist longer in the&lt;br /&gt;environment. It should be noted that sulfotepp is also used alone as a&lt;br /&gt;pesticide, marketed under the trade names ASP-47 and Bladafun by the Bayer&lt;br /&gt;Corporation for fumigation control in greenhouse crops and mushrooms&lt;br /&gt;2&lt;br /&gt;(Agrochemicals Handbook 1991).&lt;br /&gt;Although diazinon has been detected in freshwater (Bailey et al. 2000;&lt;br /&gt;Domagalski et al. 1997; Land and Brown 1996; Lowden et al. 1969; McConnell et&lt;br /&gt;al. 1998; Ritter et al. 1974), Goodman et al. (1979) reported that at the time&lt;br /&gt;of their paper diazinon had not been detected in the marine environment.&lt;br /&gt;However, they stated that the "potential exists for contamination of estuarine&lt;br /&gt;areas via agricultural and urban runoff." Organophosphorus pesticides,&lt;br /&gt;including diazinon, were found in almost all samples of seawater, but not in&lt;br /&gt;net plankton from the harbor of Osaka City, Japan (Kawai et al. 1984). Kawai&lt;br /&gt;et al. (1984) reported diazinon was applied from June to August to rice paddy&lt;br /&gt;fields resulting in concentrations in the Osaka City harbor reaching greater&lt;br /&gt;than 0.1 :g/L.&lt;br /&gt;Diazinon has been detected in point source (wastewater treatment plant&lt;br /&gt;effluents) and non-point source (storm water) discharges in recent years,&lt;br /&gt;partially due to improved detection procedures (Villarosa et al. 1994). U.S.&lt;br /&gt;EPA’s National Effluent Toxicity Assessment Center investigated the occurrence&lt;br /&gt;of diazinon in 28 different publicly owned treatment works (POTW) effluents&lt;br /&gt;located across the country in 1988 and found detectable levels in samples from&lt;br /&gt;17 of the 28 facilities, primarily those facilities located in southern states&lt;br /&gt;(Norberg-King et al. 1989). The authors concluded that the diazinon levels&lt;br /&gt;found in several effluents were sufficiently high enough to be a contributing&lt;br /&gt;factor to the toxicity observed to Ceriodaphnia dubia. The acute and chronic&lt;br /&gt;C. dubia toxicity observed in other POTW final effluents has also been&lt;br /&gt;attributed, in part to diazinon (Amato et al. 1992; Bailey et al. 1997;&lt;br /&gt;Burkhard and Jensen 1993; Guinn et al. 1995). This pass through diazinon&lt;br /&gt;toxicity present in a POTW’s final effluent could potentially cause an adverse&lt;br /&gt;impact on the receiving water community. However, Ku et al. (1998a) achieved&lt;br /&gt;nearly complete decomposition of diazinon within one hour in deionized water&lt;br /&gt;with ozone treatment under controlled laboratory conditions at a constant pH&lt;br /&gt;and temperature.&lt;br /&gt;Diazinon has also been detected in storm water runoff in urban and&lt;br /&gt;agricultural areas (Bailey et al. 1997, 2000; Domagalski et al. 1997; Kratzer&lt;br /&gt;1999; McConnell et al. 1998; NCTOC 1993; Waller et al. 1995). Domagalski et&lt;br /&gt;al. (1997) observed that in the western valley streams of the San Joaquin&lt;br /&gt;River, California, diazinon concentrations peaked within hours of the&lt;br /&gt;rainfall’s end, and then decreased thereafter. Diazinon was also detected in&lt;br /&gt;air samples over the Mississippi River from New Orleans to St. Paul, most&lt;br /&gt;closely related to use on cropland within 40 km of the river (Majewski et al.&lt;br /&gt;1998). Rainfall runoff of pesticides, such as diazinon with a water&lt;br /&gt;solubility exceeding 10 mg/L, can cause toxic additions of 1-2 percent to&lt;br /&gt;freshwater ecosystems (Wauchope 1978), and field runoff concentrations of&lt;br /&gt;diazinon have been measured up to 82 :g/L (Ritter et al. 1974). The&lt;br /&gt;widespread occurrence and concern of diazinon in storm water has been&lt;br /&gt;3&lt;br /&gt;addressed by issuance of storm water permits for large municipalities.&lt;br /&gt;The mobility of diazinon in the soil is influenced by the organic matter&lt;br /&gt;(OM) and calcium carbonate content of the soil (WHO 1998). Arienzo et al.&lt;br /&gt;(1994a,b) found that diazinon is slightly mobile in soils with a low or medium&lt;br /&gt;(&lt;2 percent) OM content and immobile in those with high OM content (&gt;2&lt;br /&gt;percent). The sorption of diazinon was enhanced when a sandy loam soil was&lt;br /&gt;modified with different exogenous organic materials containing humic-like&lt;br /&gt;substances relative to the unmodified sandy loam soil (Iglesias-Jimenez et al.&lt;br /&gt;1997). Martinez-Toledo et al. (1993) found that the presence of 10 to 300&lt;br /&gt;:g/g of diazinon in soil increased the total number of bacteria and the&lt;br /&gt;population of denitrifying bacteria. However, aerobic denitrogen fixing&lt;br /&gt;bacteria and dinitrogen fixation decreased initially (3 days) at diazinon&lt;br /&gt;concentrations of 100 to 300 :g/g before recovering to control levels.&lt;br /&gt;Nitrifying bacteria and fungal soil populations were not affected at the 10 to&lt;br /&gt;300 :g/g soil exposure levels.&lt;br /&gt;The fate of diazinon in the aquatic environment is thought to be regulated&lt;br /&gt;by two main processes - chemical hydrolysis and microbial degradation. Both&lt;br /&gt;processes are influenced by the conditions of pH, temperature and the organic&lt;br /&gt;content of the water. Diazinon is stable at pH 7.0 and can persist in the&lt;br /&gt;environment for as long as six months. Diazinon is an exception to other&lt;br /&gt;organophosphorus insecticides in that it hydrolyzes at both acidic and&lt;br /&gt;alkaline pH's (Gomaa et al. 1969). In the laboratory at 20°C, the half-life&lt;br /&gt;was determined to be 12, 4436 and 146 hr at the respective pH's of 3.1, 7.4&lt;br /&gt;and 10.4 (Faust and Gomaa 1972). Ku et al. (1998b) found that hydrolytic&lt;br /&gt;decomposition occurred only for the diazinon-H+ species present in acidic&lt;br /&gt;solutions, and that breakage of the P-O bond was the major decomposition step&lt;br /&gt;for the hydrolysis of diazinon. Morgan (1976) measured diazinon half-life due&lt;br /&gt;to hydrolysis in well water of pH 7.4 to 7.7 and 16°C at 43.3 days.&lt;br /&gt;Hydrolysis of diazinon in laboratory water at 21°C and pH of 7.3 yielded a&lt;br /&gt;half-life of 171 days (Mansour et al. 1999). The breakdown of diazinon in&lt;br /&gt;soils of flooded rice fields occurs at similar rates as in water and is&lt;br /&gt;described in a review of the literature by Sethunathan (1973).&lt;br /&gt;A third, less dominant process influencing the fate of diazinon in aquatic&lt;br /&gt;systems is photodegradation. Scheunert et al. (1993) found that when diazinon&lt;br /&gt;solutions were irradiated with UV light of different wave lengths,&lt;br /&gt;photodegradation was increased when using river or lake water when compared to&lt;br /&gt;distilled water. Medina et al. (1999) compared the half-life of diazinon in&lt;br /&gt;filtered Limon River samples under light and dark conditions and found a&lt;br /&gt;shorter half-life for sunlight exposed samples (t1/2 = 31.13 days) when&lt;br /&gt;compared to samples held in the dark (t1/2 = 37.19 days)&lt;br /&gt;An important factor regulating the rate of microbial decomposition of&lt;br /&gt;diazinon is adaptation of microbes to the chemical. Sethunathan and MacRae&lt;br /&gt;(1969), Sethunathan and Pathak (1972) and Forrest et al. (1981) found a marked&lt;br /&gt;4&lt;br /&gt;increase in the degrading capacity of microbes when repeatedly exposed to&lt;br /&gt;diazinon as compared to a single application. Parkhurst et al. (1981)&lt;br /&gt;measured a degradation rate of 2 percent/day and a half-life of 39 days in&lt;br /&gt;diazinon treated river water at summer temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;A primary mode of toxic action of organophosphorus insecticides is&lt;br /&gt;inhibition of cholinesterases present in the nervous system. The actual&lt;br /&gt;toxicant may be the oxygenated homolog of diazinon - diazoxon. Margot and&lt;br /&gt;Gysin (1957) have reported that the cholinesterase inhibiting activity of&lt;br /&gt;diazoxon is about 4,000 times greater than that of the parent diazinon.&lt;br /&gt;Diazoxon has been identified as a metabolite of diazinon in the liver&lt;br /&gt;microsomes of channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, and bluegill (Hogan and&lt;br /&gt;Knowles 1972). Insect enzymes efficiently convert the P:S bond to the P:O&lt;br /&gt;bond thus producing the toxic oxygen homolog (Albert 1981). Crustacea very&lt;br /&gt;likely have a similar ability. Insects and crustacea probably differ from&lt;br /&gt;vertebrates by having a less efficient de-esterification process to remove the&lt;br /&gt;oxygen homolog from their system, making them more sensitive to diazinon.&lt;br /&gt;Diazinon, on prolonged storage, may became more toxic due to&lt;br /&gt;transformation products. An old diazinon formulation was found to have no&lt;br /&gt;diazinon, but some sulfotepp and monosulfotepp. The monosulfotepp was shown&lt;br /&gt;to be 14,000 times more toxic than diazinon in one test of enzyme inhibition&lt;br /&gt;(Singmaster 1990). The use of the old improperly stored diazinon formulation,&lt;br /&gt;and accompanying transformation of diazinon to the more toxic products&lt;br /&gt;sulfotepp and monothiono-tepp, was cited by Soliman et al. (1982) as the most&lt;br /&gt;probable cause of two acute human poisoning cases in Egypt. Allender and&lt;br /&gt;Britt (1994) conducted a screening program throughout Australia to determine&lt;br /&gt;if a problem existed with toxic levels of breakdown products of diazinon&lt;br /&gt;formulations. Of the 169 samples evaluated, only eight contained the&lt;br /&gt;breakdown products O,S-TEPP and S,S-TEPP, which was directly correlated with&lt;br /&gt;the presence of water in the container.&lt;br /&gt;A comprehension of the "Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National Water&lt;br /&gt;Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses"&lt;br /&gt;(Stephan et al. 1985), hereafter referred to as the Guidelines, and the&lt;br /&gt;response to public comment (U.S. EPA 1985) is necessary to understand the&lt;br /&gt;following text, tables, and calculations. Whenever adequately justified, a&lt;br /&gt;national criterion may be replaced by a site-specific criterion (U.S. EPA&lt;br /&gt;1983a), which may include not only site-specific criterion concentrations&lt;br /&gt;(U.S. EPA 1983b), but also site-specific durations of averaging periods and&lt;br /&gt;site-specific frequencies of allowed excursions (U.S. EPA 1991).&lt;br /&gt;Results of intermediate calculations such as Species Mean Acute Values are&lt;br /&gt;given to four significant figures to prevent round-off error in subsequent&lt;br /&gt;calculations, not to reflect the precision of the value. The latest&lt;br /&gt;comprehensive literature search for information for this document was&lt;br /&gt;conducted in November, 1999; some of the more recent information was included.&lt;br /&gt;5&lt;br /&gt;Data in the files of the U.S. EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs concerning&lt;br /&gt;the effects of diazinon on aquatic organisms and their uses have also been&lt;br /&gt;evaluated for possible use in the derivation of aquatic life criteria.&lt;br /&gt;Acute Toxicity to Aquatic Animals&lt;br /&gt;The acute toxicity of diazinon to freshwater animals has been determined&lt;br /&gt;for 12 invertebrate species, 10 fish species and one amphibian (Table 1).&lt;br /&gt;Acute values ranged from 0.20 :g/L for an amphipod, Gammarus fasciatus&lt;br /&gt;(Johnson and Finley 1980; Mayer and Ellersieck 1986), to 11,640 :g/L for&lt;br /&gt;planaria, Dugesia tigrina (Phipps 1988). The most sensitive organisms tested&lt;br /&gt;were invertebrates in the Class Crustacea. The amphipod, G. fasciatus, had&lt;br /&gt;the lowest Genus Mean Acute Value (GMAV) of 0.2 :g/L. The cladoceran,&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia, had the second lowest GMAV which was computed from 14&lt;br /&gt;tests, ten of which were conducted by staff at the U.S. EPA-Duluth laboratory&lt;br /&gt;(Norberg-King 1987; Ankley et al. 1991). Results from these 14 tests were&lt;br /&gt;relatively consistent (acute values ranged from 0.25 to 0.59 :g/L) considering&lt;br /&gt;that different water sources were used and organism age at test initiation&lt;br /&gt;ranged from &lt;6 hr-old to 48 hr-old. Data were included in the table when the&lt;br /&gt;organisms received food during the exposure, but these data were not used to&lt;br /&gt;compute a Species Mean Acute Value (SMAV) for C. dubia. Three other&lt;br /&gt;cladoceran species (Daphnia magna, D. pulex, and Simocephalus serrulatus) were&lt;br /&gt;tested and found to be similarly sensitive to diazinon as C. dubia with EC50s&lt;br /&gt;ranging from 0.65 to 1.8 :g/L. Two species of amphipods were tested, and the&lt;br /&gt;96-hr LC50s for the two amphipod species differed by a factor of 33. One&lt;br /&gt;species, G. fasciatus, was the most sensitive organism tested with diazinon&lt;br /&gt;and had a 96-hr LC50 of 0.20 :g/L. Hyalella azteca was also sensitive to&lt;br /&gt;diazinon, with a 96-hr LC50 value of 6.51 :g/L.&lt;br /&gt;The least sensitive species tested with diazinon was also an invertebrate.&lt;br /&gt;The planarian, D. tigrina had the highest observed diazinon 96-hr LC50 of&lt;br /&gt;11,640 :g/L. Other invertebrate species exhibiting relatively low sensitivity&lt;br /&gt;to diazinon included the snail, Gillia altilis (96-hr LC50 of 11,000 :g/L),&lt;br /&gt;the oligochaete worm, Lumbriculus variegatus (96-hr LC50 values of 9,980 and&lt;br /&gt;6,160 :g/L, or a SMAV of 7,841 :g/L) and the apple snail, Pomacea paludosa&lt;br /&gt;(96-hr LC50 values of 2,950 and 3,270 and 3,390 :g/L or a SMAV of 3,198 :g/L).&lt;br /&gt;Freshwater fish species that were tested showed moderate sensitivity to&lt;br /&gt;diazinon. SMAVs ranged from 425.8 :g/L for the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus&lt;br /&gt;mykiss, to 9,000 :g/L for the goldfish, Carassius auratus (Table 1). The&lt;br /&gt;cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus clarki, was considerably less sensitive (2,166&lt;br /&gt;:g/L) to diazinon than rainbow trout. Rainbow trout were evaluated in five&lt;br /&gt;tests with results ranging from 90 :g/L (Cope 1965b; Ciba-Geigy 1976; Johnson&lt;br /&gt;and Finley 1980; Mayer and Ellersieck 1986) to 3,200 :g/L (Bathe et al.&lt;br /&gt;1975a). Certain species of warmwater fish, flagfish (Jordanella floridae),&lt;br /&gt;6&lt;br /&gt;fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas), goldfish, and zebrafish (Brachydanio&lt;br /&gt;rerio) are less sensitive to diazinon than the coldwater species, rainbow&lt;br /&gt;trout, brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), and lake trout (Salvelinus&lt;br /&gt;namaycush). Two exceptions include the warmwater bluegill, which is more&lt;br /&gt;sensitive to diazinon than the coldwater fish species, and the coldwater&lt;br /&gt;cutthroat trout, which is less sensitive than the warmwater flagfish. Genus&lt;br /&gt;Mean Acute Values for the four most sensitive genera, all crustaceans,&lt;br /&gt;differed by a factor of 7.9 (Table 3 and Figure 1). The Final Acute Value&lt;br /&gt;(FAV) for freshwater organisms is 0.1925 :g/L.&lt;br /&gt;The acute toxicity of diazinon to saltwater animals has been determined&lt;br /&gt;for seven invertebrate species and two fish species (Table 1). SMAVs ranged&lt;br /&gt;from 2.57 :g/L for the copepod, Acartia tonsa (Khattat and Farley 1976), to&lt;br /&gt;&gt;9,600 :g/L for embryos of the sea urchin, Arbacia punctulata (Thursby and&lt;br /&gt;Berry 1988), a factor of about 3,735. Acute values for the mysid,&lt;br /&gt;Americamysis bahia (formerly Mysidopsis bahia), from a renewal, unmeasured&lt;br /&gt;test (8.5 :g/L) and from a flow-through measured test (4.82 :g/L) were&lt;br /&gt;similar. Toxicity tests with copepods, mysids, amphipods (Ampelisca abdita),&lt;br /&gt;grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio), pink shrimp (Penaeus duorarum) and inland&lt;br /&gt;silversides (Menidia beryllina) demonstrated an increase in mortalities with&lt;br /&gt;duration of exposure. The remaining fish species, the sheepshead minnnow&lt;br /&gt;(Cyprinodon variegatus), had an LC50 value of 1,400 μg diazinon/L, and is the&lt;br /&gt;only saltwater fish with a corresponding chronic value. Acute values for the&lt;br /&gt;four most sensitive genera, all invertebrates, differed by only a factor of&lt;br /&gt;2.6 (Table 3 and Figure 2). The saltwater FAV is 1.637 :g/L.&lt;br /&gt;Chronic Toxicity to Aquatic Animals&lt;br /&gt;The chronic toxicity of diazinon was determined for five freshwater&lt;br /&gt;species (Table 2). A life-cycle test was conducted with C. dubia during a&lt;br /&gt;seven-day exposure (Norberg-King 1987). Diluted mineral reconstituted water&lt;br /&gt;was used to culture and expose the organisms. All organisms survived in the&lt;br /&gt;control and the three lowest exposures (0.063, 0.109, and 0.220 :g/L), but no&lt;br /&gt;organisms survived at concentrations $0.520 :g/L. The chronic value&lt;br /&gt;determined for C. dubia was 0.3382 :g/L. Division of the SMAV (0.3760 :g/L)&lt;br /&gt;from ten 48-hr acute tests conducted in the same laboratory with the same&lt;br /&gt;dilution water (Norberg-King 1987; Ankley et al. 1991) by the chronic value&lt;br /&gt;(0.3382 :g/L) results in an Acute-Chronic Ratio (ACR) of 1.112 for C. dubia.&lt;br /&gt;Allison and Hermanutz (1977) exposed brook trout adults to diazinon for&lt;br /&gt;six to eight months and then exposed their progeny for an additional 122 days&lt;br /&gt;and observed effects. After 173 days of exposure, survival was reduced at 9.6&lt;br /&gt;:g/L and deformities were seen at 4.8 :g/L. However, when these fish spawned&lt;br /&gt;there were no differences in the number of eggs produced per female or the&lt;br /&gt;viability of these eggs. Continued exposure of the progeny showed measurable&lt;br /&gt;7&lt;br /&gt;effects at 30 days, but at 122 days post-hatch, all exposure concentrations&lt;br /&gt;had significantly shorter total lengths and lighter weights. The chronic&lt;br /&gt;value was &lt;0.8 :g/L which was the lowest exposure concentration for the&lt;br /&gt;progeny. Division of the SMAV (723.0 :g/L) from three 96-hr acute tests&lt;br /&gt;(Allison and Hermanutz 1977) by the chronic value (&lt;0.8 :g/L) results in an&lt;br /&gt;ACR of &gt;903.8.&lt;br /&gt;Norberg-King (1989) exposed fathead minnow embryos and the resulting&lt;br /&gt;larvae to diazinon for 32 days in an early-life stage test. At test&lt;br /&gt;termination, wet weight and survival of test fish exposed to only the highest&lt;br /&gt;exposure concentration of 285 :g/L were significantly different from that of&lt;br /&gt;the control fish. Total length was significantly affected at concentrations&lt;br /&gt;$160 :g/L and dry weight was significantly reduced at 37.8 :g/L, but not at&lt;br /&gt;16.5 :g/L. Based upon dry weight, the chronic value for the test was 24.97&lt;br /&gt;:g/L. Division of the 96-hr LC50 (9,350 :g/L) from another group of&lt;br /&gt;researchers (University of Wisconsin-Superior 1988) at the same laboratory&lt;br /&gt;using the same water supply and the same genetic stock of fish by the chronic&lt;br /&gt;value of 24.97 :g/L results in an ACR of 374.4.&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow embryos (&lt;24-hr old) and the resulting larvae were exposed&lt;br /&gt;to diazinon for a total of 32 days (Jarvinen and Tanner 1982). Results of the&lt;br /&gt;early-life stage test were reduced survival at diazinon concentrations $290&lt;br /&gt;:g/L, and reduced weight (10.1 percent reduction) at 90 :g/L, but no weight&lt;br /&gt;difference from the control fish at 50 :g/L. The chronic value for fathead&lt;br /&gt;minnows in the test was 67.08 :g/L based upon reduced weight. Division of the&lt;br /&gt;96-hr acute value of 6,900 :g/L from a flow-through and measured toxicant&lt;br /&gt;concentration test (Jarvinen and Tanner 1982) by the chronic value of 67.08&lt;br /&gt;:g/L results in an ACR of 102.9. The geometric mean of 374.4 and 102.9 is&lt;br /&gt;196.3, which is the species mean acute-chronic ratio for fathead minnows.&lt;br /&gt;Flagfish were exposed to diazinon through one and one-half generations&lt;br /&gt;(Allison 1977). The study began with one-day-old larvae and continued through&lt;br /&gt;spawning, which occurred at about 60 days, then continued with the fish&lt;br /&gt;progeny for 35 days post-hatch. An effect was seen with the parents at 61&lt;br /&gt;days of exposure. The average wet weight of the males was significantly&lt;br /&gt;reduced from that of the control fish at diazinon concentrations #88 :g/L.&lt;br /&gt;Only two male fish were exposed per treatment and there was a 23.3 percent&lt;br /&gt;reduction in wet weight in the 88 :g/L exposure. However, weights of the four&lt;br /&gt;female fish from each treatment were not significantly reduced at any exposure&lt;br /&gt;concentration even though fish in the highest exposure concentration was&lt;br /&gt;reduced in average weight by 21.4 percent. Effects on the progeny were then&lt;br /&gt;observed and the only effect seen at hatching was a reduction in the&lt;br /&gt;incubation time at all exposure concentrations. At 35 days post-hatch, or a&lt;br /&gt;total exposure time of 96 days, significant reductions in average wet weight&lt;br /&gt;were measured at all exposure concentrations. Therefore, the flagfish chronic&lt;br /&gt;value was &lt;14 μg/L. Division of the SMAV for flagfish of 1,643 :g/L, which is&lt;br /&gt;8&lt;br /&gt;the geometric mean of results from two tests conducted in the same water&lt;br /&gt;supply and using fish from the same culture as used in the chronic test&lt;br /&gt;(Allison and Hermanutz 1977) by the chronic value of &lt;14 :g/L, results in an&lt;br /&gt;ACR of &gt;117.4.&lt;br /&gt;Bresch (1991) evaluated the chronic toxicity of diazinon to zebrafish&lt;br /&gt;(early life-stage test). Zebrafish eggs (approximately 2-3 hr after spawning)&lt;br /&gt;through juveniles were exposed to diazinon concentration of 8, 40 and 200 :g/L&lt;br /&gt;for 42 days under flow-through measured conditions. Survival and growth of&lt;br /&gt;the three treatment groups were not statistically different (p&lt;0.05) from the&lt;br /&gt;controls. Thus, the zebrafish chronic value was &gt;200 :g/L. An acute-chronic&lt;br /&gt;ratio could not be estimated because a suitable acute test value is not&lt;br /&gt;available.&lt;br /&gt;The chronic toxicity of diazinon for saltwater organisms has been&lt;br /&gt;determined in a life cycle test with the mysid, A. bahia, and a partial lifecycle&lt;br /&gt;test with the sheepshead minnow (Table 2). The mysid test (Nimmo et al.&lt;br /&gt;1981) was of 22 days duration, and the authors' original data was used to&lt;br /&gt;recalculate the chronic limits (Berry 1989). There was no statistical&lt;br /&gt;difference in survival observed between the highest concentration tested (4.4&lt;br /&gt;:g/L) and the controls (although there was only 28 percent survival at the&lt;br /&gt;highest concentration). Mysid reproduction was not significantly reduced in&lt;br /&gt;diazinon concentrations #2.1 :g/L, and only the 4.4 :g/L exposure&lt;br /&gt;concentration exhibited significantly reduced reproduction when compared to&lt;br /&gt;controls. Based on these observations, the chronic limits were 2.1 and 4.4&lt;br /&gt;:g/L, and the resultant chronic value for the mysid was 3.040 :g/L. A&lt;br /&gt;corresponding flow-through measured acute value of 4.82 :g/L (Nimmo et al.&lt;br /&gt;1981) yielded an ACR of 1.586.&lt;br /&gt;Sheepshead minnow reproduction was significantly reduced in all diazinon&lt;br /&gt;exposure concentrations observed during a partial life-cycle test (Goodman et&lt;br /&gt;al. 1979). The number of eggs spawned per female in the 0.47, 0.98, 1.8, 3.5&lt;br /&gt;and 6.5 :g diazinon/L average measured concentrations were 69, 50, 50, 55 and&lt;br /&gt;45 percent of control fish, respectively. Acetylcholinesterase activity in&lt;br /&gt;fish exposed to 0.47 :g/L was consistently less than control fish levels, and&lt;br /&gt;levels averaged 71 percent inhibition in the 6.5 :g/L exposure. Neither&lt;br /&gt;survival nor growth were affected in #6.5 :g/L exposures to diazinon. The&lt;br /&gt;chronic value for sheepshead minnow was &lt;0.47 :g/L, and when coupled with the&lt;br /&gt;96-hr acute value of 1,400 :g/L by the same author, the resultant ACR for this&lt;br /&gt;fish was &gt;2,979.&lt;br /&gt;Chronic toxicity tests have been conducted on seven aquatic species and&lt;br /&gt;chronic values ranged from 0.34 :g/L for C. dubia to &gt;200 :g/L for rainbow&lt;br /&gt;trout and zebrafish (Table 2 and Figure 3). The chronic values for sheepshead&lt;br /&gt;minnows (&lt;0.47 :g/L) and brook trout (&lt;0.8 :g/L) cannot be determined&lt;br /&gt;accurately because all concentrations tested adversely affected reproduction.&lt;br /&gt;Alternatively, an effect level on either survival or growth could not be&lt;br /&gt;9&lt;br /&gt;determined for zebrafish (&gt;200 :g/L). Acute-chronic ratios for acutely&lt;br /&gt;sensitive crustacean invertebrates were 1.586 for mysids and 1.112 for C.&lt;br /&gt;dubia. In contrast, ratios are markedly higher for relatively acutely&lt;br /&gt;insensitive fishes; &gt;117.4 for flagfish, 102.9 and 374.4 for fathead minnows,&lt;br /&gt;&gt;903.8 for brook trout and &gt;2,979 for sheepshead minnows.&lt;br /&gt;Three valid acute-chronic ratios are available for diazinon using the&lt;br /&gt;second and seventeenth (Table 3) most sensitive tested species of freshwater&lt;br /&gt;animals and the third most sensitive saltwater animal. Two acute-chronic&lt;br /&gt;ratios are available for the fathead minnow, which differ by a factor of&lt;br /&gt;approximately 3.6 times. The geometric mean of these two values is 196.3.&lt;br /&gt;The cladoceran C. dubia has an acute-chronic ratio of 1.112 when using the&lt;br /&gt;data provided by the U.S. EPA Duluth laboratory (Norberg-King 1987 and Ankley&lt;br /&gt;et al. 1991), which was very similar to the mysid acute-chronic ratio of 1.586&lt;br /&gt;(Nimmo et al. 1981). An apparent pattern displayed by the data reviewed shows&lt;br /&gt;that a number of invertebrate species (especially crustacea) are acutely&lt;br /&gt;sensitive to diazinon, but have a low (&lt;2) acute-chronic ratio. In contrast,&lt;br /&gt;most fish species are generally acutely insensitive to diazinon, but have high&lt;br /&gt;(&gt;100) acute-chronic ratios. Another pattern observed was that the chronic&lt;br /&gt;fish studies conducted with reagent grade diazinon all had relatively high&lt;br /&gt;chronic values (&gt;200 μg/L), and those conducted with technical grade diazinon&lt;br /&gt;all had lower chronic values (&gt;70 μg/L). Although there are a limited number&lt;br /&gt;of chronic fish studies presented, this apparent pattern would suggest that&lt;br /&gt;other toxic impurities may be present in the technical material.&lt;br /&gt;Although the three valid acute-chronic ratios vary by more than a factor&lt;br /&gt;of ten (by a factor of 177), the Guidelines (Stephen et al. 1985) specify that&lt;br /&gt;if the species mean acute-chronic ratio (SMACR) seems to increase or decrease&lt;br /&gt;as the SMAV increases, the Final Acute-Chronic Ratio (FACR) should be&lt;br /&gt;calculated as the geometric mean of the ACRs for species whose SMAVs are close&lt;br /&gt;to the FAV. It does appear that ACR values are lower for species acutely&lt;br /&gt;sensitive to diazinon, and higher for acutely insensitive species (Table 2).&lt;br /&gt;Therefore, only the acutely sensitive C. dubia and A. bahia were used to&lt;br /&gt;calculate the FACR of 1.328. The Guidelines also stipulate, if the most&lt;br /&gt;appropriate SMACRs are less than 2.0, acclimation has probably occurred during&lt;br /&gt;the chronic test, and the FACR should be assumed to be 2.0. Thus the FACR for&lt;br /&gt;diazinon is 2.0. It appears from available data (Fig. 3) that all tested&lt;br /&gt;freshwater species will be protected from adverse effects due to diazinon by&lt;br /&gt;the freshwater Chronic Value. Saltwater fish species may not be protected by&lt;br /&gt;the established saltwater Chronic Value, and the FCV for salt water species is&lt;br /&gt;lowered to 0.40 μg/L to protect the sheepshead minnow.&lt;br /&gt;Toxicity to Aquatic Plants&lt;br /&gt;Acceptable data on the effects of diazinon to freshwater algae are&lt;br /&gt;10&lt;br /&gt;available for one species (Table 4), but no acceptable data are available&lt;br /&gt;concerning toxicity to freshwater vascular plants. Hughes (1988) exposed the&lt;br /&gt;green alga, Selenastrum capricornutum, for seven days in a static, measured&lt;br /&gt;toxicant concentration test. An EC50 of 6,400 :g/L was determined based upon&lt;br /&gt;reduced cell numbers. No saltwater tests with plants are suitable, according&lt;br /&gt;to the Guidelines, for inclusion in this section. Some freshwater and&lt;br /&gt;saltwater information is included with "Other Data."&lt;br /&gt;Based upon a single aquatic plant test, the Final Plant Value for diazinon&lt;br /&gt;is 6,400 :g/L.&lt;br /&gt;Bioaccumulation&lt;br /&gt;Three freshwater species of fish, rainbow trout, carp (Cyprinus carpio)&lt;br /&gt;and a guppy (Poecilia reticulata), were exposed to diazinon for 14 days and&lt;br /&gt;the whole body tissue loadings determined (Seguchi and Asaka 1981; Keizer et&lt;br /&gt;al. 1993). Diazinon accumulated rapidly in each study, and reached a plateau&lt;br /&gt;approximately in three days. The bioconcentration factor (BCF) for rainbow&lt;br /&gt;trout and carp exposed to 15 :g diazinon/L was 62 and 120, respectively (Table&lt;br /&gt;5). The half-life for diazinon in these fish was less than seven days. The&lt;br /&gt;guppy was exposed to 350 :g diazinon/L for 14 days, which yielded a BCF value&lt;br /&gt;of 188 (Keizer et al. 1993).&lt;br /&gt;In a 108-day saltwater exposure, uptake of diazinon by the sheepshead&lt;br /&gt;minnow was rapid, reaching steady state within 4 days (Goodman, et al. 1979).&lt;br /&gt;Whole body (less brain) bioconcentration factors for fish exposed to 1.8, 3.5&lt;br /&gt;and 6.5 :g/L were 147, 147 and 213, respectively (Table 5).&lt;br /&gt;No U.S. FDA action level or other maximum acceptable concentration in&lt;br /&gt;tissue, as defined in the Guidelines, is available for diazinon. Therefore,&lt;br /&gt;the Final Residue Value cannot be calculated.&lt;br /&gt;Other Data&lt;br /&gt;Additional data on the lethal and sublethal effects of diazinon for&lt;br /&gt;freshwater species are presented in Table 6. Sewage microbes (Bauer et al.&lt;br /&gt;1981) and actinomycete bacteria (Sethunathan and MacRae 1969) appear to be&lt;br /&gt;unaffected or have growth enhancement at diazinon concentrations near water&lt;br /&gt;saturation. Data seem to vary greatly for several species of single celled&lt;br /&gt;green plants and diatoms. The green algal species, Chlorella ellipsoidea and&lt;br /&gt;Chlamydomonas sp., were affected only at concentrations of 100,000 :g/L. The&lt;br /&gt;green algae Scenedesmus quadricauda was not affected at 1,000 :g/L, but a&lt;br /&gt;mixture of green alga and diatoms had reduced growth at &lt;10 :g/L (Butler et&lt;br /&gt;al. 1975a). From Table 4, the green alga Selenastrum capricornutum showed&lt;br /&gt;adverse reproduction at 6,400 :g/L. Duckweed (Wolffia papulifera) had 100&lt;br /&gt;percent mortality at 100,000 :g/L saturation and developed deformities at&lt;br /&gt;11&lt;br /&gt;10,000 :g/L in 11-day exposures (Worthley and Schott 1971). Various tested&lt;br /&gt;species of protozoans demonstrated low sensitivity to diazinon compared to&lt;br /&gt;crustacean and vertebrate species. Adverse affects were reported for&lt;br /&gt;protozoans from .3,000 :g/L (Evtugyn et al. 1997) to 29,200 :g/L (Fernandez-&lt;br /&gt;Casalderrey et al. 1992b). In contrast, the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus,&lt;br /&gt;was investigated by Fernandez-Casalderrey (1992a,b,c,d) and found to be&lt;br /&gt;substantially less sensitive than cladocerans and insects to diazinon with&lt;br /&gt;respect to survival (24-hr LC50 of 29,220 :g/L), filtration and ingestion&lt;br /&gt;rates (50 percent reduction at 14,000 :g/L), reproduction (decreased&lt;br /&gt;reproduction at &lt;5,000 :g/L), and median lethal time effects (LT50 values&lt;br /&gt;ranged from 2.5 to 4 days for 14,000 and 5,000 :g/L, respectively). Juchelka&lt;br /&gt;and Snell (1994) estimated a 48-hr ingestion rate NOEC of 20,000 :g/L for B.&lt;br /&gt;calyciflorus, and Snell and Moffat (1992) calculated a reproductive NOEC of&lt;br /&gt;8,000 :g/L. Chatterjee and Konar (1984) observed a 96-hr LC50 of 2,220 :g/L&lt;br /&gt;for the tubificid worm, Branchiura sowerbyi. A snail species (Physa acuta)&lt;br /&gt;had a 48-hr LC50 of 4,800 :g/L which is near the upper end of the range of&lt;br /&gt;fish 96-hr LC50s (Hashimoto and Nishiuchi 1981).&lt;br /&gt;Dortland (1980) conducted a series of tests with the cladoceran, Daphnia&lt;br /&gt;magna, and found in one exposure that 0.2 :g/L did not affect the organisms&lt;br /&gt;during the 21-day exposure, but 0.3 :g/L reduced reproduction and mobility.&lt;br /&gt;In four other 21-day tests in which the test organisms were fed, the EC50s&lt;br /&gt;ranged from 0.22 to 0.8 :g/L. D. magna 21-day unmeasured renewal tests&lt;br /&gt;conducted by Fernandez-Casalderrey et al. (1995) yielded survival NOEC and&lt;br /&gt;LOEC effect levels of 0.15 :g/L and 0.18 :g diazinon/L, respectively. The&lt;br /&gt;mean total young per female and mean brood size were both significantly&lt;br /&gt;reduced at the 0.15 :g/L (lowest exposure) concentration when compared to the&lt;br /&gt;controls.&lt;br /&gt;Amphipods are usually very sensitive to diazinon. Collyard et al. (1994)&lt;br /&gt;compared the sensitivity of different H. azteca age groups to diazinon. The&lt;br /&gt;eight different age groups (0-2 to 24-26 days old at test initiation) had very&lt;br /&gt;similar 96-hr LC50 values that ranged from 3.8 to 6.2 :g/L. One exception to&lt;br /&gt;the normally sensitive amphipod was the 96-hr LC50 of 200 :g diazinon/L&lt;br /&gt;determined for Gammarus lacustris by Sanders (1969).&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito larvae appear to be about as sensitive to diazinon as cladocerans&lt;br /&gt;and amphipods. Yasuno and Kerdpibule (1967) exposed mosquito larvae, Culex&lt;br /&gt;pipiens fatigans, to diazinon in 24-hr exposures and measured LC50s ranging&lt;br /&gt;from 1.8 to 5.7 :g/L. Caddisfly larvae have been exposed to diazinon in 6-hr&lt;br /&gt;exposures (Fredeen 1972). The results were highly variable with LC50s ranging&lt;br /&gt;from 500 to 2,500 :g/L for Hydropsyche morosa, and &gt;500 :g/L for H. recurvata.&lt;br /&gt;It is difficult to predict the LC50 values at exposure durations longer than 6&lt;br /&gt;hr, but it is likely that caddisfly LC50 values would be considerably lower&lt;br /&gt;than 500 :g/L if exposed to diazinon for longer time periods. A species of&lt;br /&gt;stonefly, Pteronarcys californicus, was exposed for 48 hr and had an EC50 of&lt;br /&gt;12&lt;br /&gt;74 :g/L (Cope 1965a), which again shows insects to be quite sensitive to&lt;br /&gt;diazinon. In contrast, the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus, was investigated&lt;br /&gt;by Fernandez-Casalderrey (1992a,b,c,d) and found to be substantially less&lt;br /&gt;sensitive than cladocerans and insects to diazinon with respect to survival&lt;br /&gt;(24-hr LC50 of 29,220 :g/L), filtration and ingestion rates (50 percent&lt;br /&gt;reduction at 14,000 :g/L), reproduction (decreased reproduction at &lt;5,000&lt;br /&gt;:g/L), and median lethal time effects (LT50 values ranged from 2.5 to 4 days&lt;br /&gt;for 14,000 and 5,000 :g/L, respectively).&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow trout fingerlings were exposed to diazinon concentration of 8, 40&lt;br /&gt;and 200 :g/L under flow-through measured conditions for 28 days (Bresch 1991).&lt;br /&gt;Survival and growth of rainbow trout in the three treatment groups after 28&lt;br /&gt;days were not statistically (p&gt;0.05) different from the control group. The&lt;br /&gt;resultant chronic value for rainbow trout was &gt;200 :g/L diazinon.&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow trout were also exposed to an insecticidal soap formulation of&lt;br /&gt;diazinon for 96 hr and an unspecified form of diazinon for 48 hr, and the&lt;br /&gt;resultant LC50s were 20 and 170 :g/L, respectively. Cutthroat trout of two&lt;br /&gt;sizes were exposed to diazinon for 96 hr which resulted in LC50s of 3,850 :g/L&lt;br /&gt;for the smaller and 2,760 :g/L for the larger fish. The LC50s for rainbow&lt;br /&gt;trout and cutthroat trout were consistent with the values used in Table 1 for&lt;br /&gt;the same species. Brown trout, Salmo trutta lacustris, were also relatively&lt;br /&gt;sensitive to diazinon having a 96-hr LC50 value of 602 :g/L for an unspecified&lt;br /&gt;formulation of diazinon.&lt;br /&gt;Goldfish and carp are relatively tolerant of diazinon in acute exposures,&lt;br /&gt;but newly hatched fathead minnow larvae were found to be sensitive to the&lt;br /&gt;technical form of diazinon in seven-day exposures (Norberg-King 1989).&lt;br /&gt;Jarvinen and Tanner (1982) exposed fathead minnows to an encapsulated&lt;br /&gt;formulation of diazinon in acute and chronic exposures. The encapsulated&lt;br /&gt;formulation was less toxic (5,100 and 6,100 :g/L) than the technical grade&lt;br /&gt;(2,100 and 4,300 :g/L; Table 1) in 96-hr exposures. They obtained a chronic&lt;br /&gt;value of 55.14 :g/L, based upon reduction in weight in embryo-larval 32-day&lt;br /&gt;exposures with the encapsulated formulation. The fathead minnow acute-chronic&lt;br /&gt;ratio for the encapsulated formulation is 101.6 which is similar to the acutechronic&lt;br /&gt;ratio of 102.9 for the technical grade chemical (Table 2) with this&lt;br /&gt;species.&lt;br /&gt;Allison (1977) exposed flagfish, J. floridae, in a 21-day pulsed dose&lt;br /&gt;exposure with diazinon followed by a period without the chemical to observe&lt;br /&gt;effects. Exposure of the parental stock beginning at hatch and lasting 21&lt;br /&gt;days resulted in decreased egg production by the females at concentrations&lt;br /&gt;$290 :g/L. Exposure to diazinon for 21 days just prior to spawning resulted&lt;br /&gt;in decreased parental survival at concentrations $250 :g/L, but there were no&lt;br /&gt;effects upon reproduction at the 250 and 450 :g/L exposure concentrations.&lt;br /&gt;Exposure of adults to diazinon for 21 days once spawning had been initiated&lt;br /&gt;resulted in decreased survival of the parents at the highest exposure&lt;br /&gt;13&lt;br /&gt;concentration (1,170 :g/L), and reduced survival of larval progeny at 1,170&lt;br /&gt;:g/L.&lt;br /&gt;Chen et al. (1971) exposed the guppy, P. reticulata, to diazinon and&lt;br /&gt;measured 24-hr LC50s of 3,700 and 3,800 :g/L. These values were in agreement&lt;br /&gt;with the work of Ciba-Geigy (1976) which measured a 96-hr LC50 of 3,000 :g/L&lt;br /&gt;for the same fish species. Ohayo-Mitoko and Deneer (1993) estimated a lethal&lt;br /&gt;body burden of 2,495 :g diazinon/L for the guppy. Relative to some other fish&lt;br /&gt;species, the guppy appears to be more tolerant of diazinon than trout species&lt;br /&gt;but less tolerant than tested cyprinid species (fathead minnow and goldfish).&lt;br /&gt;Bluegill, L. macrochirus, were tested by two research groups with widely&lt;br /&gt;different results (Table 6). The results of Cope (1965a) indicate that the&lt;br /&gt;bluegill is a relatively sensitive species (48-hr EC50 of 30 :g/L), whereas&lt;br /&gt;the work of Li and Chen (1981) indicate intermediate sensitivity (48-hr LC50&lt;br /&gt;of 1,493 :g/L) relative to other fish species.&lt;br /&gt;Bioconcentration factors were determined for various aquatic species with&lt;br /&gt;a value of 4.9 for the crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Kanazawa 1978), 17.5 for&lt;br /&gt;the guppy (Kanazawa 1978), 28 for oriental weatherfish, Misgurnus&lt;br /&gt;anguillicaudatus (Seguchi and Asaka 1981), 62 for rainbow trout (Seguchi and&lt;br /&gt;Asaka 1981), and for carp 20.9 (Tsuda et al. 1990), 65.1 (Kanazawa 1978) and&lt;br /&gt;120 (Seguchi and Asaka 1981).&lt;br /&gt;Other data on the lethal and sublethal effects of diazinon on saltwater&lt;br /&gt;species (Table 6) did not indicate greater sensitivities than indicated&lt;br /&gt;previously. Saltwater algae appear to be less sensitive to diazinon than&lt;br /&gt;aquatic animals. Photosynthesis of natural phytoplankton was essentially&lt;br /&gt;unaffected by a 4-hr exposure to 1,000 :g/L (Butler 1963). There was no&lt;br /&gt;effect of diazinon at 1,000 :g/L on sexual reproduction of the red alga,&lt;br /&gt;Champia parvula (Thursby and Tagliabue 1988). A 24-hr exposure of the red&lt;br /&gt;alga, Chondrus crispus, to 10,000 :g diazinon/L had no effect on the growth of&lt;br /&gt;the alga in a subsequent 18-day grow-out period (Shacklock and Croft 1981).&lt;br /&gt;Rotifers, Brachionis plicatilis, were also not acutely sensitive to diazinon&lt;br /&gt;(Thursby and Berry 1988). Growth of eastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica,&lt;br /&gt;was not reduced in a diazinon exposure of 1,000 :g/L (Butler 1963). Shacklock&lt;br /&gt;and Croft (1981) showed that two days after a 3-hr exposure to 1,000 :g&lt;br /&gt;diazinon/L, 100 percent of the amphipod, Gammarus oceanicus, and the isopod,&lt;br /&gt;Idotea baltica, as well as 88 percent of the saltwater snail, Lacuna vincta,&lt;br /&gt;test organisms were dead. The 48-hr EC50 of diazinon to grass shrimp,&lt;br /&gt;Palaemonetes pugio, was 28 :g/L (Mayer 1987). The brown shrimp, Penaeus&lt;br /&gt;aztecus, had a 24-hr EC50 of 44 :g/L (Butler 1963) and a 48-hr EC50 of 28 :g/L&lt;br /&gt;(Mayer 1987). The 24- and 48-hr LC50s for the white mullet, Mugil curema,&lt;br /&gt;were both 250 :g/L.&lt;br /&gt;An aquatic microcosm study was conducted by Giddings et al. (1996) with&lt;br /&gt;technical grade diazinon to measure the effects of a range of diazinon&lt;br /&gt;exposure regimes to many taxonomic groups under simulated field conditions,&lt;br /&gt;14&lt;br /&gt;and to determine the relationship between the level of diazinon exposure and&lt;br /&gt;the magnitude of ecological response. Eighteen fiberglass tanks, each 3.2 m&lt;br /&gt;in diameter and 1.5 m in depth, were established with sediment and water (11.2&lt;br /&gt;m3) from natural ponds and stocked with 40 juvenile bluegill sunfish (L.&lt;br /&gt;macrochirus). Diazinon was applied in aqueous solution three times at 7-day&lt;br /&gt;intervals. Eight loading rates were used, with two microcosms at each level&lt;br /&gt;plus two controls. The amounts of diazinon added during each application&lt;br /&gt;corresponded to theoretical concentrations from 2.0 :g/L to 500 :g/L. The&lt;br /&gt;most sensitive ecological components of the microcosms were Cladocera&lt;br /&gt;(zooplankton), and Pentaneurini and Ceratopogonidae (chironomid insects),&lt;br /&gt;which were reduced at all treatment levels. Effects on many zooplankton and&lt;br /&gt;macroinvertebrate taxa occurred at diazinon concentrations (time-weighted&lt;br /&gt;averages) of 9.2 :g/L and higher. Total fish biomass was reduced at 22 :g/L&lt;br /&gt;and higher, and fish survival was reduced at 54 :g/L and higher. Odonates,&lt;br /&gt;some dipterans, and plants were not adversely affected by diazinon at 443&lt;br /&gt;:g/L, the highest concentration tested. Microcosm results were consistent&lt;br /&gt;with laboratory toxicity data for some taxa (e.g., cladocerans, Ephemeroptera,&lt;br /&gt;and bluegill sunfish), but differed substantially for others (e.g., rotifers,&lt;br /&gt;Chironomini, and odonates). The NOEC (4.3 μg/L) in the microcosms (70-d timeweighted&lt;br /&gt;average) was near the 10th percentile of single species LC50 values.&lt;br /&gt;Outdoor experimental channels at EPA’s Monitcello Ecological Research&lt;br /&gt;Station (Mississippi River water) were used by Arthur et al. (1983) to&lt;br /&gt;evaluate the effects of diazinon on macroinvertebrates. One channel served as&lt;br /&gt;a control and two channels as low and high treatments. The low and high&lt;br /&gt;treatment channels were continuously dosed at either 0.3 or 3 :g/L nominal&lt;br /&gt;diazinon concentrations for 12 weeks, then increased to 6 and 12 :g/L nominal&lt;br /&gt;diazinon levels for four weeks, and finally the high treatment was increased&lt;br /&gt;to 30 :g/L and the low treatment channel returned to ambient. Only the first&lt;br /&gt;12 week dosing regime achieved nominal diazinon levels (0.3 and 3 :g/L) as&lt;br /&gt;indicated by analytical measurements, the latter two dosing regimes did not&lt;br /&gt;reach the intended levels. No consistent interchannel differences were&lt;br /&gt;observed in total macroinvertebrate abundance or in species diversity indices.&lt;br /&gt;Hyalella was the most sensitive species encountered, exhibiting substantially&lt;br /&gt;higher (5 to 8 times) drift rates in the 0.3 :g diazinon/L dosed channel&lt;br /&gt;relative to the control channel, and had sharply reduced population levels at&lt;br /&gt;diazinon concentrations as low as 5 :g/L. Macroinvertebrate diazinon&lt;br /&gt;tolerance from most tolerant to least tolerant was observed as: flatworms,&lt;br /&gt;physid snails, isopods and chironomids most tolerant; leeches and the amphipod&lt;br /&gt;Crangonyx less tolerant; the amphipod Hyalella, mayflies, caddisflies and&lt;br /&gt;damselflies sensitive.&lt;br /&gt;Unused Data&lt;br /&gt;15&lt;br /&gt;Some data concerning the effects of diazinon on aquatic organisms and&lt;br /&gt;their uses were not used because the tests were conducted with species that&lt;br /&gt;are not resident in North America or because the test species was not obtained&lt;br /&gt;from a wild population in North America and was not identified well enough to&lt;br /&gt;determine whether it is resident in North America (e.g., Alabaster 1969; Alam&lt;br /&gt;and Maughan 1993; Alam et al. 1995; Anees 1974, 1976, 1978; Arab et al. 1990;&lt;br /&gt;Asaka et al. 1980; Bajpai and Perti 1969; Boumaiza et al. 1979; Ceron et al.&lt;br /&gt;1996a,b; Chu and Lau 1994; El-Elaimy et al. 1990; Ferrando et al. 1991; Hamm&lt;br /&gt;et al. 1998; Hidaka et al. 1984; Hirayama and Tamanoi 1980; Hirose and&lt;br /&gt;Kawakami 1977; Hirose and Kitsukama 1976; Hirose et al. 1979; Iqbal et al.&lt;br /&gt;1992; Kabir and Ahmed 1979; Kabir and Begum 1978; Kanazawa 1975, 1980,&lt;br /&gt;1981a,b, 1983a; Khalaf-Allah 1999; Kikuchi et al. 1992; Kimura and Keegan&lt;br /&gt;1966; Kobayashi et al. 1993; Miah et al. 1995; Morale et al. 1998; Niforos and&lt;br /&gt;Lim 1998; Nishiuchi and Yoshida 1972; Rompas et al. 1989; Sakr and Gabr 1992;&lt;br /&gt;Sakr et al. 1991; Sancho et al. 1992a,b, 1993a,b, 1994; Setakana and Tan 1991;&lt;br /&gt;Shigehisa and Shiraishi 1998; Sinha et al. 1987; Stevens 1991, 1992; Stevens&lt;br /&gt;and Warren 1992; Tsuda et al. 1989, 1992, 1995a,b, 1997a,b; Uno et al. 1997;&lt;br /&gt;Van der Geest et al. 1999; Yasutomi and Takahashi 1987). Results (e.g.&lt;br /&gt;Kuwabara et al. 1980) of tests conducted with brine shrimp, Artemia sp., were&lt;br /&gt;not used because these species are from a unique saltwater environment.&lt;br /&gt;Bay et al. 1993; Connolly 1985; Dyer et al. 1997; Eisler 1986; Garten and&lt;br /&gt;Trabalka 1983; Kaiser et al. 1997; Kanazawa 1982; Kenaga 1979, 1982; Robinson&lt;br /&gt;1999; Roex et al. 2000; Sanchez et al. 1998; Steen et al. 1999; Van der Geest&lt;br /&gt;et al. 1997; Vighi and Calamari 1987; Vittozzi and DeAngelis 1991; Yoshioka et&lt;br /&gt;al. 1986; Zaroogian et al. 1985a,b compiled data from other sources. Results&lt;br /&gt;were not used when either the test procedures, test material, or dilution&lt;br /&gt;water was not adequately described (e.g., Adlung 1957; Ansari et al. 1987;&lt;br /&gt;Butler et al. 1975a,b; Chatterjee 1975; Hashimoto and Fukami 1969; Hatakeyama&lt;br /&gt;and Sugaya 1989; Kaur and Toor 1980; Murray and Guthrie 1980; Oh et al. 1991;&lt;br /&gt;Qadri and Anjum 1982).&lt;br /&gt;Data were not used when diazinon was a component of a drilling mud,&lt;br /&gt;effluent, fly ash, mixture, formulation, sediment, or sludge (e.g., Alam and&lt;br /&gt;Maughan 1992; Amato et al. 1992; Bailey et al. 1996, 2000; Bathe et al. 1975a,&lt;br /&gt;b; Bishop et al. 1999; Burchfield and Storrs 1954; Burkhard and Jenson 1993;&lt;br /&gt;Deanovic et al. 1996, 1997; Dennis et al. 1979a,b; DeVlaming et al. 2000;&lt;br /&gt;Doggett and Rhodes 1991; Duursma and Hanafi 1975; Foe 1995; Foe et al. 1998;&lt;br /&gt;Glass et al. 1995; Gruber and Munn 1998; Hashimoto et al. 1982; Hatakeyama et&lt;br /&gt;al. 1997; Hendriks et al. 1998; Hilsenhoff 1959; Kikuchi et al. 1996; Kuivila&lt;br /&gt;and Foe 1995; LaBrecque et al. 1956; Larsen et al. 1998; Lehotay et al. 1998;&lt;br /&gt;McLeay and Hall 1999; Macek 1975; Malone and Blaylock 1970; Matsuo and Tamura&lt;br /&gt;1970; Mazidji et al. 1990; Mulla et al. 1963; Nishiuchi 1977; Pan and Dutta&lt;br /&gt;1998; Rettich 1979; Singh 1973; Steinberg et al. 1992; Tripathi 1992; Tsuda et&lt;br /&gt;al. 1997a,b; Verma et al. 1982; Werner et al. 2000; Wong 1997; Wong and Chang&lt;br /&gt;16&lt;br /&gt;1988), unless data were available to show that the toxicity was the same as&lt;br /&gt;diazinon alone. Anjum and Siddiqui 1990; Ansari and Kumar 1988; Ariyoshi et&lt;br /&gt;al. 1990; Burbank and Snell 1994; Christensen and Tucker 1976; Dutta et al.&lt;br /&gt;1992a,b, 1993, 1994, 1997; Dyer et al. 1993; Fujii and Asaka 1982; Garrood et&lt;br /&gt;al. 1990; Hiltibran 1974, 1982; Keizer et al. 1995; Kraus 1985; Mitsuhashi et&lt;br /&gt;al. 1970; Moore and Waring 1996; Olson and Christensen 1980; Qadri and Dutta&lt;br /&gt;1995; Sastry and Malik 1982a,b; Sastry and Sharma 1980, 1981; Vigfusson et al.&lt;br /&gt;1983; Weiss 1959, 1961; Weiss and Gakstater 1964; Whitmore and Hodges (1978)&lt;br /&gt;exposed plasma, enzymes, excised or homogenized tissue, tissue extracts, or&lt;br /&gt;cell cultures. Tests conducted without controls or with too few test&lt;br /&gt;organisms were not used (e.g., Applegate et al. 1957; Devillers et al. 1985;&lt;br /&gt;Federle and Collins 1976). Data of Norland et al. (1974) were not used&lt;br /&gt;because it was derived using organisms preconditioned to organophosphorus&lt;br /&gt;chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;Results of some laboratory tests were not used because the tests were&lt;br /&gt;conducted in distilled or deionized water without addition of appropriate&lt;br /&gt;salts or were conducted in chlorinated or "tap" water (e.g., Mulla et al.&lt;br /&gt;1962; Rettich 1977; Yasuno et al. 1965), or the concentration of a watermiscible&lt;br /&gt;solvent used to prepare the test solution exceeded 0.5 mL/L (Beauvais&lt;br /&gt;et al. 2000). Hirakoso 1968; Lee et al. 1993; Jamnback and Frempong-Boadu&lt;br /&gt;1966; Klassen et al. 1965; Kok 1972; Lilly et al. 1969; Mulla 1963; Nishiuchi&lt;br /&gt;and Asano 1979; O'Kelley and Deason 1976; Steinberg et al. 1993 were not used&lt;br /&gt;because the results were not adequately described or could not be interpreted.&lt;br /&gt;BCFs and BAFs from laboratory tests were not used when the tests were&lt;br /&gt;static or when the concentration of diazinon in the test solution was not&lt;br /&gt;adequately measured or varied too much (e.g., Khattat and Farley 1976).&lt;br /&gt;Toxicity data were not used if they were generated with a photoluminescence&lt;br /&gt;assay utilizing lyophilized marine bacteria that had been rehydrated (e.g.,&lt;br /&gt;Curtis et al. 1982). Reports of the concentration of diazinon in wild aquatic&lt;br /&gt;organisms (e.g., Clark et al. 1984) were not used to calculate BAFs when&lt;br /&gt;either the number of measurements of the concentration in water was too small&lt;br /&gt;or the range of the measured concentrations in water was too large. BCFs&lt;br /&gt;obtained from microcosm or model ecosystem studies were not used when the&lt;br /&gt;concentration of diazinon in water decreased with time (e.g., Miller et al.&lt;br /&gt;1966).&lt;br /&gt;Summary&lt;br /&gt;The acute toxicity of diazinon to freshwater organisms was determined for&lt;br /&gt;17&lt;br /&gt;12 invertebrate species, 10 fish species and one amphibian (Figure 1). Eight&lt;br /&gt;of the invertebrate species (two insects and six crustaceans) were the most&lt;br /&gt;sensitive organisms tested (0.20 to 25 :g/L) and one invertebrate species&lt;br /&gt;(planarian) was the most tolerant species tested (11,640 :g/L). Freshwater&lt;br /&gt;fish were intermediate in sensitivity to the two groups of invertebrates.&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) was the most sensitive fish (425.8 :g/L),&lt;br /&gt;and goldfish (Carassius auratus) was the most tolerant fish tested (9,000&lt;br /&gt;:g/L). No relationships have been demonstrated between water quality&lt;br /&gt;characteristics such as hardness and toxicity. The freshwater Final Acute&lt;br /&gt;Value is 0.1925 :g/L.&lt;br /&gt;Six chronic exposures were conducted with five species of freshwater&lt;br /&gt;organisms (Figure 3). Chronic values ranged from 0.3382 to &gt;200 :g/L, and the&lt;br /&gt;Acute-Chronic Ratios (ACRs) ranged from 1.112 for Ceriodaphnia dubia to &gt;903.8&lt;br /&gt;for brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). The Final Acute-Chronic Ratio for&lt;br /&gt;diazinon was derived using two ACR’s for tested species near the FAV because&lt;br /&gt;the ACR’s decreased with SMAV’s. Because the computed FACR was less than 2.0&lt;br /&gt;indicating that the organisms may have become acclimated to diazinon during&lt;br /&gt;the study, the value was changed to 2.0. Thus, the freshwater Final Chronic&lt;br /&gt;Value (FCV) for diazinon is 0.0963 μg/L (FAV ÷ FACR, or 0.1925 μg/L ÷ 2.0 =&lt;br /&gt;0.0963 μg/L).&lt;br /&gt;The acute toxicity of diazinon to saltwater organisms was determined for&lt;br /&gt;nine species, of which seven were invertebrates (Figure 2). Five of the&lt;br /&gt;invertebrates were crustaceans and the most sensitive species tested (2.57 to&lt;br /&gt;21 :g/L) and two species (an annelid and an echinoderm) were the most tolerant&lt;br /&gt;species tested (&gt;2,880 and &gt;9,600 :g/L, respectively). Two species of&lt;br /&gt;saltwater fish were tested and they were intermediate in sensitivity with&lt;br /&gt;acute values of 1,170 and 1,470 :g/L. The saltwater Final Acute Value is&lt;br /&gt;1.637 :g/L.&lt;br /&gt;Chronic values were determined for two species of saltwater organisms.&lt;br /&gt;The mysid, Americamysis bahia, and the sheepshead minnow, Cyprinodon&lt;br /&gt;variegatus, had chronic values of 3.040 and &lt;0.47 :g/L, respectively (Figure&lt;br /&gt;3). ACRs were 1.586 and &gt;3,128 for the mysid and sheepshead minnow,&lt;br /&gt;respectively. The Final Acute-Chronic Ratio for diazinon is 2.0 (see previous&lt;br /&gt;text). Thus, the saltwater Final Chronic Value (FCV) for diazinon is 0.8185&lt;br /&gt;μg/L (FAV ÷ FACR, or 1.637 μg/L ÷ 2.0 = 0.8185 μg/L). The FCV for salt water&lt;br /&gt;is lowered to 0.4 :g/L to protect the important sheepshead minnow.&lt;br /&gt;Only one acceptable test with a freshwater algal species (Selenastrum&lt;br /&gt;capricornutum) was conducted, whereas no acceptable toxicity data are&lt;br /&gt;available for freshwater vascular plants. No saltwater tests with aquatic&lt;br /&gt;plants were suitable for consideration when estimating the Final Plant Value.&lt;br /&gt;Therefore, based upon this single test, the Final Plant Value is 6,400 :g/L.&lt;br /&gt;Bioaccumulation of diazinon was measured in three species of freshwater&lt;br /&gt;fish and steady-state levels were reached in about three days.&lt;br /&gt;18&lt;br /&gt;Bioconcentration factors of 62, 120 and 188 were determined for rainbow trout,&lt;br /&gt;carp (Cyprinus carpio) and guppies (Poecilia reticulata), respectively. The&lt;br /&gt;tissue half-life was less than seven days. Bioaccumulation of diazinon was&lt;br /&gt;determined in one saltwater species. The sheepshead minnow was exposed for&lt;br /&gt;108 days to three concentrations and had a mean bioconcentration factor of 169&lt;br /&gt;times the concentration in water. No U.S. FDA action level or other maximum&lt;br /&gt;acceptable concentration in tissue, as defined in the Guidelines, is available&lt;br /&gt;for diazinon. Therefore, the Final Residue Value cannot be calculated.&lt;br /&gt;National Criteria&lt;br /&gt;The procedures described in the "Guidelines for Deriving Numerical&lt;br /&gt;National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and&lt;br /&gt;Their Uses" (Stephan et al. 1985) indicate that, except possibly where a&lt;br /&gt;locally important species is very sensitive, freshwater aquatic organisms and&lt;br /&gt;their uses should not be affected unacceptably if the one-hour average&lt;br /&gt;concentration does not exceed 0.10 μg/L more than once every three years on&lt;br /&gt;the average and if the four-day average concentration of diazinon does not&lt;br /&gt;exceed 0.10 μg/L more than once every three years on the average.&lt;br /&gt;The procedures described in the "Guidelines for Deriving Numerical&lt;br /&gt;National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and&lt;br /&gt;Their Uses" (Stephan et al. 1985) indicate that, except possibly where a&lt;br /&gt;locally important species is very sensitive, saltwater aquatic organisms and&lt;br /&gt;their uses should not be affected unacceptably if the one-hour average&lt;br /&gt;concentration does not exceed 0.82 μg/L more than once every three years on&lt;br /&gt;the average and if the four-day average concentration of diazinon does not&lt;br /&gt;exceed 0.40 μg/L more than once every three years on the average. Because&lt;br /&gt;sensitive saltwater animals appear to have a narrow range of acute&lt;br /&gt;susceptibilities to diazinon, this criterion will probably be as protective as&lt;br /&gt;intended only when the magnitude and/or duration of excursions are&lt;br /&gt;appropriately small.&lt;br /&gt;Implementation&lt;br /&gt;As discussed in the Water Quality Standards Regulation (U.S. EPA 1983a)&lt;br /&gt;and the Foreword to this document, a water quality criterion for aquatic life&lt;br /&gt;has regulatory impact only after it has been adopted in a state water quality&lt;br /&gt;standard. Such a standard specifies a criterion for a pollutant that is&lt;br /&gt;consistent with a particular designated use. With the concurrence of the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;EPA, states designate one or more uses for each body of water or segment&lt;br /&gt;thereof and adopt criteria that are consistent with the use(s) (U.S. EPA&lt;br /&gt;1983b, 1987). In each standard a state may adopt the national criterion, if&lt;br /&gt;one exists, or, if adequately justified, a site-specific criterion. (If the&lt;br /&gt;19&lt;br /&gt;site is an entire state, the site-specific criterion is also a state-specific&lt;br /&gt;criterion.)&lt;br /&gt;Site-specific criteria may include not only site-specific criterion&lt;br /&gt;concentrations (U.S. EPA 1983b), but also site-specific, and possibly&lt;br /&gt;pollutant-specific, durations of averaging periods and frequencies of allowed&lt;br /&gt;excursions (U.S. EPA 1991). The averaging periods of "one hour" and "four&lt;br /&gt;days" were selected by the U.S. EPA on the basis of data concerning how&lt;br /&gt;rapidly some aquatic species react to increases in the concentrations of some&lt;br /&gt;pollutants, and "three years" is the Agency's best scientific judgment of the&lt;br /&gt;average amount of time aquatic ecosystems should be provided between&lt;br /&gt;excursions (Stephan et al. 1985; U.S. EPA 1991). However, various species and&lt;br /&gt;ecosystems react and recover at greatly differing rates. Therefore, if&lt;br /&gt;adequate justification is provided, site-specific and/or pollutant-specific&lt;br /&gt;concentrations, durations, and frequencies may be higher or lower than those&lt;br /&gt;given in national water quality criteria for aquatic life.&lt;br /&gt;Use of criteria, which have been adopted in state water quality standards,&lt;br /&gt;for developing water quality-based permit limits and for designing waste&lt;br /&gt;treatment facilities requires selection of an appropriate wasteload allocation&lt;br /&gt;model. Although dynamic models are preferred for the application of these&lt;br /&gt;criteria (U.S. EPA 1991), limited data or other considerations might require&lt;br /&gt;the use of a steady-state model (U.S. EPA 1986). Guidance on mixing zones and&lt;br /&gt;the design of monitoring programs is also available (U.S. EPA 1987, 1991).&lt;br /&gt;0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0&lt;br /&gt;% Rank GMAVs&lt;br /&gt;0.01&lt;br /&gt;0.1&lt;br /&gt;1&lt;br /&gt;10&lt;br /&gt;100&lt;br /&gt;1000&lt;br /&gt;104&lt;br /&gt;105&lt;br /&gt;Diazinon Effect Concentrations (μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Figure 1. Ranked Summary of Diazinon GMAVs&lt;br /&gt;Freshwater&lt;br /&gt;Fish&lt;br /&gt;Invertebrates&lt;br /&gt;Amphibians&lt;br /&gt;Freshwater Final Acute Value = 0.1925 μg/L Diazinon&lt;br /&gt;Criteria Maximum Concentration = 0.0963 μg/L Diazinon&lt;br /&gt;0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0&lt;br /&gt;% Rank GMAVs&lt;br /&gt;0.1&lt;br /&gt;1&lt;br /&gt;10&lt;br /&gt;100&lt;br /&gt;1000&lt;br /&gt;104&lt;br /&gt;Diazinon Effect Concentrations (μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Figure 2. Ranked Summary of Diazinon GMAVs&lt;br /&gt;Saltwater&lt;br /&gt;Fish&lt;br /&gt;Invertebrates&lt;br /&gt;Saltwater Final Acute Value = 1.637 μg/L Diazinon&lt;br /&gt;Criteria Maximum Concentration = 0.8185 μg/L Diazinon&lt;br /&gt;0.00 0.15 0.30 0.45 0.60 0.75 0.90&lt;br /&gt;% Rank Genus Mean Chronic Value&lt;br /&gt;0.01&lt;br /&gt;0.1&lt;br /&gt;1&lt;br /&gt;10&lt;br /&gt;100&lt;br /&gt;1000&lt;br /&gt;Chronic Value (μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Figure 3. Chronic Toxicity of Diazinon to Aquatic Animals&lt;br /&gt;Freshwater Invertebrates&lt;br /&gt;Freshwater Fish&lt;br /&gt;Saltwater Invertebrates&lt;br /&gt;Saltwater Fish&lt;br /&gt;Saltwater Final Chronic Value = 0.40 μg/L Diazinon&lt;br /&gt;Freshwater Final Chronic Value = 0.0963 μg/L Diazinon&lt;br /&gt;Table 1. Acute Toxicity of Diazinon to Aquatic Animals&lt;br /&gt;Species Method&lt;br /&gt;a&lt;br /&gt;Chemicalb&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3)&lt;br /&gt;LC50&lt;br /&gt;or EC50&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Species&lt;br /&gt;Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute&lt;br /&gt;Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;FRESHWATER SPECIES&lt;br /&gt;Planaria,&lt;br /&gt;Dugesia tigrina&lt;br /&gt;S, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;46.5-&lt;br /&gt;47.5&lt;br /&gt;11,640 11,640 Phipps 1988&lt;br /&gt;Oligochaete worm,&lt;br /&gt;Lumbriculus&lt;br /&gt;variegatus&lt;br /&gt;S, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;46-48 9,980 - Phipps 1988&lt;br /&gt;Oligochaete worm,&lt;br /&gt;Lumbriculus&lt;br /&gt;variegatus&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(95%)&lt;br /&gt;42-47 6,160 7,841 Ankley and Collyard&lt;br /&gt;1995&lt;br /&gt;Snail (2.4 g),&lt;br /&gt;Gillia altilis&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(89%)&lt;br /&gt;22-35 11,000 11,000 Robertson and&lt;br /&gt;Mazzella 1989&lt;br /&gt;Apple snail (1-day),&lt;br /&gt;Pomacea paludosa&lt;br /&gt;F, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(87%)&lt;br /&gt;130.5 2,950 - Call 1993&lt;br /&gt;Apple snail (7-days),&lt;br /&gt;Pomacea paludosa&lt;br /&gt;F, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(87%)&lt;br /&gt;219 3,270 - Call 1993&lt;br /&gt;Apple snail (7-days),&lt;br /&gt;Pomacea paludosa&lt;br /&gt;F, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(87%)&lt;br /&gt;173.5 3,390 3,198 Call 1993&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;40 0.57c,d - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Table 1. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Method&lt;br /&gt;a&lt;br /&gt;Chemicalb&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3)&lt;br /&gt;LC50&lt;br /&gt;or EC50&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Species&lt;br /&gt;Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute&lt;br /&gt;Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;45 0.66c,d - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;40-48 0.57c,d - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;- &gt;1.0c,d - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;40 &gt;0.6d - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;6 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;40 0.66c,d - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;48 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;- 0.35 - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;48 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;- 0.35 - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;6 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;- 0.25 - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;- 0.33 - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;48 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;- 0.35 - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Table 1. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Method&lt;br /&gt;a&lt;br /&gt;Chemicalb&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3)&lt;br /&gt;LC50&lt;br /&gt;or EC50&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Species&lt;br /&gt;Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute&lt;br /&gt;Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;48 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;- 0.59 - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;48 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;- 0.43 - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;48 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;- 0.35 - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;48 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;- 0.36 - Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;48 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(95%)&lt;br /&gt;40-48 0.5 - Ankley et al. 1991&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, M Analytical&lt;br /&gt;(99%)&lt;br /&gt;80-100 0.58 - Bailey et al. 1997&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, M Analytical&lt;br /&gt;(99%)&lt;br /&gt;80-100 0.48 - Bailey et al. 1997&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, M Analytical&lt;br /&gt;(99%)&lt;br /&gt;80-100 0.26 - Bailey et al. 1997&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;S, M Analytical&lt;br /&gt;(99%)&lt;br /&gt;80-100 0.29 0.3773 Bailey et al. 1997&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;20 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical 50 0.96 - Vilkas 1976&lt;br /&gt;Table 1. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Method&lt;br /&gt;a&lt;br /&gt;Chemicalb&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3)&lt;br /&gt;LC50&lt;br /&gt;or EC50&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Species&lt;br /&gt;Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute&lt;br /&gt;Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;S, U Analytical 200 1.5 - Dortland 1980&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;48 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(95%)&lt;br /&gt;40-48 0.8 1.048 Ankley et al. 1991&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (first&lt;br /&gt;instar),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia pulex&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(89%)&lt;br /&gt;47 0.90 - Cope 1965a; Sanders&lt;br /&gt;and Cope 1966&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (first&lt;br /&gt;instar),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia pulex&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(89%)&lt;br /&gt;47 0.8 - Johnson and Finley&lt;br /&gt;1980; Mayer and&lt;br /&gt;Ellersieck 1986&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;48 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia pulex&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(95%)&lt;br /&gt;40-48 0.65 0.7764 Ankley et al. 1991&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (first&lt;br /&gt;instar),&lt;br /&gt;Simocephalus&lt;br /&gt;serrulatus&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(89%)&lt;br /&gt;47 1.8 - Cope 1965a; Sanders&lt;br /&gt;and Cope 1966; Mayer&lt;br /&gt;and Ellersieck 1986&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (first&lt;br /&gt;instar),&lt;br /&gt;Simocephalus&lt;br /&gt;serrulatus&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(89%)&lt;br /&gt;47 1.4 1.587 Sanders and Cope&lt;br /&gt;1966; Johnson and&lt;br /&gt;Finley 1980; Mayer&lt;br /&gt;and Ellersieck 1986&lt;br /&gt;Table 1. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Method&lt;br /&gt;a&lt;br /&gt;Chemicalb&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3)&lt;br /&gt;LC50&lt;br /&gt;or EC50&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Species&lt;br /&gt;Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute&lt;br /&gt;Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (mature),&lt;br /&gt;Gammarus fasciatus&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(89%)&lt;br /&gt;44 0.20 0.20 Johnson and Finley&lt;br /&gt;1980; Mayer and&lt;br /&gt;Ellersieck 1986&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (7-14 days),&lt;br /&gt;Hyalella azteca&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(95%)&lt;br /&gt;42-47 6.51 6.51 Ankley and Collyard&lt;br /&gt;1995&lt;br /&gt;Stonefly (larva 30-35&lt;br /&gt;mm), Pteronarcys&lt;br /&gt;californica&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(89%)&lt;br /&gt;47 25 25 Cope 1965a; Sanders&lt;br /&gt;and Cope 1968;&lt;br /&gt;Johnson and Finley&lt;br /&gt;1980; Mayer and&lt;br /&gt;Ellersieck 1986&lt;br /&gt;Midge (third instar),&lt;br /&gt;Chironomus tentans&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(95%)&lt;br /&gt;42-47 10.7 10.7 Ankley and Collyard&lt;br /&gt;1995&lt;br /&gt;Cutthroat trout (2.0&lt;br /&gt;g), Oncorhynchus&lt;br /&gt;clarki&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92%)&lt;br /&gt;162 1,700 - Johnson and Finley&lt;br /&gt;1980; Mayer and&lt;br /&gt;Ellersieck 1986&lt;br /&gt;Cutthroat trout (2.0&lt;br /&gt;g), Oncorhynchus&lt;br /&gt;clarki&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92%)&lt;br /&gt;44 2,760 2,166 Mayer and Ellersieck&lt;br /&gt;1986&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow trout (3.7&lt;br /&gt;cm),&lt;br /&gt;Oncorhynchus mykiss&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical - 400 - Beliles 1965&lt;br /&gt;Table 1. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Method&lt;br /&gt;a&lt;br /&gt;Chemicalb&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3)&lt;br /&gt;LC50&lt;br /&gt;or EC50&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Species&lt;br /&gt;Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute&lt;br /&gt;Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow trout (1.20&lt;br /&gt;g),&lt;br /&gt;Oncorhynchus mykiss&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(89%)&lt;br /&gt;44 90 - Cope 1965a; Johnson&lt;br /&gt;and Finley 1980;&lt;br /&gt;Mayer and Ellersieck&lt;br /&gt;1986&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow trout (25-50&lt;br /&gt;g),&lt;br /&gt;Oncorhynchus mykiss&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical - 3,200 - Bathe et al. 1975a&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow trout,&lt;br /&gt;Oncorhynchus mykiss&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical - 90 - Ciba-Giegy 1976&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow trout,&lt;br /&gt;Oncorhynchus mykiss&lt;br /&gt;S, U Reagent 192 1,350 425.8 Meier et al. 1979;&lt;br /&gt;Dennis et al. 1980&lt;br /&gt;Brook trout (1 yr),&lt;br /&gt;Salvelinus fontinalis&lt;br /&gt;F, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92.5%)&lt;br /&gt;45 800 - Allison and Hermanutz&lt;br /&gt;1977&lt;br /&gt;Brook trout (1 yr),&lt;br /&gt;Salvelinus fontinalis&lt;br /&gt;F, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92.5%)&lt;br /&gt;45 450 - Allison and Hermanutz&lt;br /&gt;1977&lt;br /&gt;Brook trout (1 yr),&lt;br /&gt;Salvelinus fontinalis&lt;br /&gt;F, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92.5%)&lt;br /&gt;45 1,050 723.0 Allison and Hermanutz&lt;br /&gt;1977&lt;br /&gt;Lake trout (3.20 g),&lt;br /&gt;Salvelinus namaycush&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92%)&lt;br /&gt;162 602 602 Johnson and Finley&lt;br /&gt;1980; Mayer and&lt;br /&gt;Ellerseick 1986&lt;br /&gt;Zebrafish (0.4 g),&lt;br /&gt;Brachydanio rerio&lt;br /&gt;R, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(98%)&lt;br /&gt;- 8,000 8,000 Keizer et al. 1991&lt;br /&gt;Table 1. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Method&lt;br /&gt;a&lt;br /&gt;Chemicalb&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3)&lt;br /&gt;LC50&lt;br /&gt;or EC50&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Species&lt;br /&gt;Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute&lt;br /&gt;Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow,&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;S, U Reagent 192 10,300d - Meier et al. 1979;&lt;br /&gt;Dennis et al. 1980&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow&lt;br /&gt;(newly hatched&lt;br /&gt;larva),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;S, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(87.1%)&lt;br /&gt;(fresh&lt;br /&gt;stock&lt;br /&gt;solution)&lt;br /&gt;45.8 4,300d - Jarvinen and Tanner&lt;br /&gt;1982&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow&lt;br /&gt;(newly hatched&lt;br /&gt;larva),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;S, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(87.1%)&lt;br /&gt;(aged&lt;br /&gt;stock&lt;br /&gt;solution)&lt;br /&gt;45.8 2,100d - Jarvinen and Tanner&lt;br /&gt;1982&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow&lt;br /&gt;(juvenile),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;F, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92.5%)&lt;br /&gt;45 10,000 - Allison and Hermanutz&lt;br /&gt;1977&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow&lt;br /&gt;(newly hatched&lt;br /&gt;larva),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;F, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(87.1%)&lt;br /&gt;45 6,900 - Jarvinen and Tanner&lt;br /&gt;1982&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow&lt;br /&gt;(juvenile),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;F, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(87.1%)&lt;br /&gt;43.6 9,350 8,641 University of&lt;br /&gt;Wisconsin-Superior&lt;br /&gt;1988&lt;br /&gt;Table 1. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Method&lt;br /&gt;a&lt;br /&gt;Chemicalb&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3)&lt;br /&gt;LC50&lt;br /&gt;or EC50&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Species&lt;br /&gt;Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute&lt;br /&gt;Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Goldfish (2.5-6.0&lt;br /&gt;cm),&lt;br /&gt;Carassius auratus&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(91%)&lt;br /&gt;- 9,000 9,000 Beliles 1965&lt;br /&gt;Flagfish (6 wk),&lt;br /&gt;Jordanella floridae&lt;br /&gt;F, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92.5%)&lt;br /&gt;45 1,500 - Allison and Hermanutz&lt;br /&gt;1977&lt;br /&gt;Flagfish (7 wk),&lt;br /&gt;Jordanella floridae&lt;br /&gt;F, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92.5%)&lt;br /&gt;45 1,800 1,643 Allison and Hermanutz&lt;br /&gt;1977&lt;br /&gt;Guppy (0.6 g),&lt;br /&gt;Poecilia reticulata&lt;br /&gt;R, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(98%)&lt;br /&gt;- 800 800 Keizer et al. 1991&lt;br /&gt;Bluegill (2.5-5.0&lt;br /&gt;cm),&lt;br /&gt;Lepomis macrochirus&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical - 136d - Beliles 1965&lt;br /&gt;Bluegill (0.87 g),&lt;br /&gt;Lepomis macrochirus&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical - 22d - Cope 1965b&lt;br /&gt;Bluegill,&lt;br /&gt;Lepomis macrochirus&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical - 22d - Ciba-Geigy 1976&lt;br /&gt;Bluegill (0.8 g),&lt;br /&gt;Lepomis macrochirus&lt;br /&gt;S, U Reagent 192 120d - Meier et al. 1979;&lt;br /&gt;Dennis et al. 1980&lt;br /&gt;Bluegill (1.00 g),&lt;br /&gt;Lepomis macrochirus&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92%)&lt;br /&gt;44 168.0d - Johnson and Finley&lt;br /&gt;1980; Mayer and&lt;br /&gt;Ellersieck 1986&lt;br /&gt;Table 1. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Method&lt;br /&gt;a&lt;br /&gt;Chemicalb&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3)&lt;br /&gt;LC50&lt;br /&gt;or EC50&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Species&lt;br /&gt;Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute&lt;br /&gt;Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Bluegill (1 yr.),&lt;br /&gt;Lepomis macrochirus&lt;br /&gt;F, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92.5%)&lt;br /&gt;45 480 - Allison and Hermanutz&lt;br /&gt;1977&lt;br /&gt;Bluegill (1 yr.),&lt;br /&gt;Lepomis macrochirus&lt;br /&gt;F, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92.5%)&lt;br /&gt;45 440 459.6 Allison and Hermanutz&lt;br /&gt;1977&lt;br /&gt;Green frog (stage 8),&lt;br /&gt;Rana clamitans&lt;br /&gt;R, U Technical - &gt;50 &gt;50 Harris et al. 1998&lt;br /&gt;Table 1. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Method&lt;br /&gt;a&lt;br /&gt;Chemicalb&lt;br /&gt;Salinity&lt;br /&gt;(g/kg)&lt;br /&gt;LC50&lt;br /&gt;or EC50&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Species&lt;br /&gt;Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute&lt;br /&gt;Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;SALTWATER SPECIES&lt;br /&gt;Annelid worm&lt;br /&gt;(juvenile),&lt;br /&gt;Neanthes&lt;br /&gt;arenaceodentata&lt;br /&gt;R, U (96%) 30 &gt;2,880 &gt;2,880 Thursby &amp; Berry 1988&lt;br /&gt;Copepod (adult),&lt;br /&gt;Acartia tonsa&lt;br /&gt;S, M Technical&lt;br /&gt;(97.6%)&lt;br /&gt;20 2.57 2.57 Khattat &amp; Farley 1976&lt;br /&gt;Mysid (juvenile),&lt;br /&gt;Americamysis bahia&lt;br /&gt;R, U (96%) 29 8.5d - Thursby &amp; Berry 1988&lt;br /&gt;Mysid (juvenile),&lt;br /&gt;Americamysis bahia&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical 25 8.5d - Cripe 1994&lt;br /&gt;Mysid (juvenile),&lt;br /&gt;Americamysis bahia&lt;br /&gt;F, M Diazinon 17 4.82 4.82 Nimmo et al. 1981&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (juvenile),&lt;br /&gt;Ampelisca abdita&lt;br /&gt;R, U (96%) 30 6.6 6.6 Thursby &amp; Berry 1988&lt;br /&gt;Pink shrimp (larval),&lt;br /&gt;Penaeus duorarum&lt;br /&gt;S, U Technical 25 21 21 Cripe 1994&lt;br /&gt;Grass shrimp&lt;br /&gt;(larval),&lt;br /&gt;Palaemonetes pugio&lt;br /&gt;R, U (96%) 30 2.8 2.8 Thursby &amp; Berry 1988&lt;br /&gt;Table 1. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Method&lt;br /&gt;a&lt;br /&gt;Chemicalb&lt;br /&gt;Salinity&lt;br /&gt;(g/kg)&lt;br /&gt;LC50&lt;br /&gt;or EC50&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Species&lt;br /&gt;Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute&lt;br /&gt;Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Sea urchin&lt;br /&gt;(embryo/larval),&lt;br /&gt;Arbacia punctulata&lt;br /&gt;S, U (96%) 31 &gt;9,600 &gt;9,600 Thursby &amp; Berry 1988&lt;br /&gt;Sheepshead minnow&lt;br /&gt;(juvenile),&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinodon variegatus&lt;br /&gt;F, M (92.6%) 23 1,400 1,400 Goodman et al. 1979;&lt;br /&gt;Mayer 1987&lt;br /&gt;Inland silverside&lt;br /&gt;(juvenile),&lt;br /&gt;Menidia beryllina&lt;br /&gt;R, U (96%) 30 1,170 1,170 Thursby &amp; Berry 1988&lt;br /&gt;a S = static; R = renewal; F = flow-through; M = measured; U = unmeasured.&lt;br /&gt;b Percent purity is given in parenthesis when available&lt;br /&gt;c Animals were fed during the exposure&lt;br /&gt;d Results were not used in the calculation of the Species Mean Acute Value due to availability of data from more&lt;br /&gt;sensitive test conditions.&lt;br /&gt;Table 2. Chronic Toxicity of Diazinon to Aquatic Animals&lt;br /&gt;Species Testa Chemicalb&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3)&lt;br /&gt;Chronic&lt;br /&gt;Limits&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Chronic&lt;br /&gt;Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;FRESHWATER SPECIES&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;6-hr.&lt;br /&gt;old),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;LC&lt;br /&gt;(7-&lt;br /&gt;day)&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;40 0.220-0.520 0.3382 Norberg-King&lt;br /&gt;1987&lt;br /&gt;Brook trout&lt;br /&gt;(yearling),&lt;br /&gt;Salvelinus&lt;br /&gt;fontinalis&lt;br /&gt;PLC Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92.5%)&lt;br /&gt;45 0-0.8 &lt;0.8 Allison and&lt;br /&gt;Hermanutz 1977&lt;br /&gt;Zebrafish,&lt;br /&gt;Brachydanio rerio&lt;br /&gt;ELS Analytical 360 200-&gt;200 &gt;200 Bresch 1991&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow&lt;br /&gt;(embryo-larva),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;ELS Technical&lt;br /&gt;(87.1%)&lt;br /&gt;45.8 50-90 67.08 Jarvinen and&lt;br /&gt;Tanner 1982&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow&lt;br /&gt;(embryo-larva),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;ELS Technical&lt;br /&gt;(88.2%)&lt;br /&gt;44-49 16.5-37.8 24.97 Norberg-King&lt;br /&gt;1989&lt;br /&gt;Flagfish (1-day&lt;br /&gt;old),&lt;br /&gt;Jordanella floridae&lt;br /&gt;LC - - 0-14 &lt;14 Allison 1977&lt;br /&gt;SALTWATER SPECIES&lt;br /&gt;Table 2. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Mysid (juvenile),&lt;br /&gt;Americamysis bahia&lt;br /&gt;LC - 30-31c 2.1-4.4 3.040 Nimmo et al.&lt;br /&gt;1981&lt;br /&gt;Sheepshead minnow&lt;br /&gt;(juvenile),&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinodon&lt;br /&gt;variegatus&lt;br /&gt;PLC Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92.6%)&lt;br /&gt;16.5c 0-0.47 &lt;0.47 Goodman et al.&lt;br /&gt;1979&lt;br /&gt;a PLC = partial life-cycle; ELS = early life-stage; LC = life cycle.&lt;br /&gt;b Percent purity is listed in parentheses when available.&lt;br /&gt;C Salinity g/kg.&lt;br /&gt;Acute-Chronic Ratio&lt;br /&gt;Species&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3)&lt;br /&gt;Acute Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Chronic Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L) Ratio&lt;br /&gt;Mean&lt;br /&gt;Ratio&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran,&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;40 0.3760 0.3382 1.112 1.112&lt;br /&gt;Mysid,&lt;br /&gt;Americamysis bahia&lt;br /&gt;17c 4.82 3.040 1.586 1.586&lt;br /&gt;Flagfish,&lt;br /&gt;Jordanella&lt;br /&gt;floridae&lt;br /&gt;45 1,643 &lt;14 &gt;117.4 &gt;117.4&lt;br /&gt;Table 2. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow,&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales&lt;br /&gt;promelas&lt;br /&gt;45.8 6,900 67.08 102.9 -&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow,&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales&lt;br /&gt;promelas&lt;br /&gt;44-49 9,350 24.97 374.4 196.3&lt;br /&gt;Brook trout,&lt;br /&gt;Salvelinus&lt;br /&gt;fontinalis&lt;br /&gt;45 723.0 &lt;0.8 &gt;903.8 &gt;903.8&lt;br /&gt;Sheepshead minnow,&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinodon&lt;br /&gt;variegatus&lt;br /&gt;16.5c 1,400 &lt;0.47 &gt;2,979 &gt;2,979&lt;br /&gt;c Salinity (g/kg).&lt;br /&gt;Table 3. Ranked Genus Mean Acute Values with Species Mean Acute-Chronic Ratios&lt;br /&gt;Ranka&lt;br /&gt;Genus Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L) Species&lt;br /&gt;Species Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)b&lt;br /&gt;Species Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute-Chronic&lt;br /&gt;Ratioc&lt;br /&gt;FRESHWATER SPECIES&lt;br /&gt;20 11,640 Planaria,&lt;br /&gt;Dugesia tigrina&lt;br /&gt;11,640 -&lt;br /&gt;19 11,000 Snail,&lt;br /&gt;Gillia altilis&lt;br /&gt;11,000 -&lt;br /&gt;18 9,000 Goldfish,&lt;br /&gt;Carassius auratus&lt;br /&gt;9,000 -&lt;br /&gt;17 8,641 Fathead minnow,&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;8,641 196.3&lt;br /&gt;16 8,000 Zebrafish,&lt;br /&gt;Brachydanio rerio&lt;br /&gt;8,000 -&lt;br /&gt;15 7,841 Oligachaete worm,&lt;br /&gt;Lumbricus variegatus&lt;br /&gt;7,841 -&lt;br /&gt;14 3,198 Snail,&lt;br /&gt;Pomacea paludosa&lt;br /&gt;3,198 -&lt;br /&gt;13 1,643 Flagfish,&lt;br /&gt;Jordanella floridae&lt;br /&gt;1,643 &gt;117.4&lt;br /&gt;12 960.4 Cutthroat trout,&lt;br /&gt;Oncorhynchus clarki&lt;br /&gt;2,166 -&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow trout,&lt;br /&gt;Oncorhynchus mykiss&lt;br /&gt;425.8 -&lt;br /&gt;11 800 Guppy,&lt;br /&gt;Poecilia reticulata&lt;br /&gt;800 -&lt;br /&gt;10 660 Brook trout,&lt;br /&gt;Salvelinus fontinalis&lt;br /&gt;723 &gt;903.8&lt;br /&gt;Table 3. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Ranka&lt;br /&gt;Genus Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L) Species&lt;br /&gt;Species Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)b&lt;br /&gt;Species Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute-Chronic&lt;br /&gt;Ratioc&lt;br /&gt;Lake trout,&lt;br /&gt;Salvelinus namaycush&lt;br /&gt;602 -&lt;br /&gt;9 459.6 Bluegill,&lt;br /&gt;Lepomis macrochirus&lt;br /&gt;459.6 -&lt;br /&gt;8 &gt;50 Green frog&lt;br /&gt;Rana clamitans&lt;br /&gt;&gt;50 -&lt;br /&gt;7 25 Stonefly,&lt;br /&gt;Pteronarcys californica&lt;br /&gt;25 -&lt;br /&gt;6 10.7 Midge,&lt;br /&gt;Chironomus tentans&lt;br /&gt;10.7 -&lt;br /&gt;5 6.51 Amphipod,&lt;br /&gt;Hyalella azteca&lt;br /&gt;6.51 -&lt;br /&gt;4 1.587 Cladoceran,&lt;br /&gt;Simocephalus serrulatus&lt;br /&gt;1.587 -&lt;br /&gt;3 0.9020 Cladoceran,&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;1.048 -&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran,&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia pulex&lt;br /&gt;0.7764 -&lt;br /&gt;2 0.3773 Cladoceran,&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;0.3773 1.112&lt;br /&gt;1 0.20 Amphipod,&lt;br /&gt;Gammarus fasciatus&lt;br /&gt;0.20 -&lt;br /&gt;Table 3. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Ranka&lt;br /&gt;Genus Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L) Species&lt;br /&gt;Species Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute Value&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)b&lt;br /&gt;Species Mean&lt;br /&gt;Acute-Chronic&lt;br /&gt;Ratioc&lt;br /&gt;SALTWATER SPECIES&lt;br /&gt;9 &gt;9,600 Sea urchin,&lt;br /&gt;Arbacia punctulata&lt;br /&gt;&gt;9,600 -&lt;br /&gt;8 &gt;2,880 Annelid worm,&lt;br /&gt;Neanthes&lt;br /&gt;arenaceodentata&lt;br /&gt;&gt;2,880 -&lt;br /&gt;7 1,400 Sheepshead minnow,&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinodon variegatus&lt;br /&gt;1,400 &gt;2,979&lt;br /&gt;6 1,170 Inland silverside,&lt;br /&gt;Menidia beryllina&lt;br /&gt;1,170 -&lt;br /&gt;5 21 Pink shrimp,&lt;br /&gt;Penaeus duorarum&lt;br /&gt;21 -&lt;br /&gt;4 6.6 Amphipod,&lt;br /&gt;Ampelisca abdita&lt;br /&gt;6.6 -&lt;br /&gt;3 4.82 Mysid,&lt;br /&gt;Americamysis bahia&lt;br /&gt;4.82 1.586&lt;br /&gt;2 2.8 Grass shrimp&lt;br /&gt;Palaemonetes pugio&lt;br /&gt;2.8 -&lt;br /&gt;1 2.57 Copepod,&lt;br /&gt;Acartia tonsa&lt;br /&gt;2.57 -&lt;br /&gt;a Ranked from most resistant to most sensitive based on Genus Mean Acute Values.&lt;br /&gt;b From Table 1.&lt;br /&gt;c From Table 2.&lt;br /&gt;Table 3. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Fresh Water&lt;br /&gt;Final Acute Value = 0.1925 μg/L&lt;br /&gt;Criterion Maximum Concentration = (0.1925 μg/L)/2 = 0.0963 μg/L&lt;br /&gt;Final Acute-Chronic Ratio = 2.0 (see text)&lt;br /&gt;Final Chronic Value = (0.1925 μg/L)/2.0 = 0.0963 μg/L&lt;br /&gt;Salt Water&lt;br /&gt;Final Acute Value = 1.637 μg/L&lt;br /&gt;Criterion Maximum Concentration = (1.637 μg/L)/2 = 0.8185 :g/L&lt;br /&gt;Final Acute-Chronic Ratio = 2.0 (see text)&lt;br /&gt;Final Chronic Value = (1.637 μg/L)/2.0 = 0.8185 μg/L&lt;br /&gt;Table 4. Toxicity of Diazinon to Aquatic Plants&lt;br /&gt;Species&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as CaCO3)&lt;br /&gt;Duration&lt;br /&gt;(days) Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentration&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L) Reference&lt;br /&gt;FRESHWATER SPECIES&lt;br /&gt;Green algae,&lt;br /&gt;Selenastrum capricornutum&lt;br /&gt;- 7 EC50&lt;br /&gt;(cell numbers)&lt;br /&gt;6,400 Hughes 1988&lt;br /&gt;Table 5. Bioaccumulation of Diazinon by Aquatic Organisms&lt;br /&gt;Species&lt;br /&gt;Concentration&lt;br /&gt;in Water&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)a&lt;br /&gt;Duration&lt;br /&gt;(days) Tissue&lt;br /&gt;Percent&lt;br /&gt;Lipids&lt;br /&gt;BCF or&lt;br /&gt;BAFb&lt;br /&gt;Normalized&lt;br /&gt;BCF or&lt;br /&gt;BAFc&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;FRESHWATER SPECIES&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow trout (16&lt;br /&gt;g),&lt;br /&gt;Oncorhynchus&lt;br /&gt;mykiss&lt;br /&gt;15 14 Whole body - 62 - Seguchi and Asaka&lt;br /&gt;1981&lt;br /&gt;Carp (8 g),&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinus carpio&lt;br /&gt;15 14 Whole body - 120 - Seguchi and Asaka&lt;br /&gt;1981&lt;br /&gt;Guppy,&lt;br /&gt;Poecilia&lt;br /&gt;reticulata&lt;br /&gt;350 14 Whole body - 188 - Keizer et al. 1993&lt;br /&gt;SALTWATER SPECIES&lt;br /&gt;Sheepshead minnow,&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinodon&lt;br /&gt;variegatus&lt;br /&gt;1.8 108 Whole body&lt;br /&gt;(less&lt;br /&gt;brain)&lt;br /&gt;- 147 - Goodman et al.&lt;br /&gt;1979&lt;br /&gt;Sheepshead minnow,&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinodon&lt;br /&gt;variegatus&lt;br /&gt;3.5 108 Whole body&lt;br /&gt;(less&lt;br /&gt;brain)&lt;br /&gt;- 147 - Goodman et al.&lt;br /&gt;1979&lt;br /&gt;Sheepshead minnow,&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinodon&lt;br /&gt;variegatus&lt;br /&gt;6.5 108 Whole body&lt;br /&gt;(less&lt;br /&gt;brain)&lt;br /&gt;- 213 - Goodman et al.&lt;br /&gt;1979&lt;br /&gt;a Measured concentration of diazinon.&lt;br /&gt;b Bioconcentration factors (BCFs) and bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) are based on measured concentrations of diazinon in water&lt;br /&gt;and in tissue.&lt;br /&gt;c When possible, the factors were normalized to 1% lipids by dividing the BCFs and BAFs by the percent lipids.&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. Other Data on Effects of Diazinon on Aquatic Organisms&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentratio&lt;br /&gt;n&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;FRESHWATER SPECIES&lt;br /&gt;Sewage microbes Regent - 22 hr No reduction of&lt;br /&gt;oxygen&lt;br /&gt;consumption&lt;br /&gt;40,000 Bauer et al. 1981&lt;br /&gt;Actinomycete bacteria Technical - 20 days Stimulated&lt;br /&gt;growth&lt;br /&gt;40,000 Sethunathan and&lt;br /&gt;MacRae 1969&lt;br /&gt;Green alga,&lt;br /&gt;Chlorella ellipsoidea&lt;br /&gt;- - 72 hr Decreased ATP&lt;br /&gt;content&lt;br /&gt;100,000 Clegg and Koevenig&lt;br /&gt;1974&lt;br /&gt;Green alga,&lt;br /&gt;Chlamydomonas sp.&lt;br /&gt;- - 72 hr Decreased ATP&lt;br /&gt;content&lt;br /&gt;100,000 Clegg and Koevenig&lt;br /&gt;1974&lt;br /&gt;Green alga,&lt;br /&gt;Scenedesmus quadricauda&lt;br /&gt;- - 10 days No decrease in&lt;br /&gt;cell number,&lt;br /&gt;biomass, or&lt;br /&gt;photosynthesis&lt;br /&gt;1,000 Stadnyk and Campbell&lt;br /&gt;1971&lt;br /&gt;Mixture of green alga&lt;br /&gt;and diatoms&lt;br /&gt;(99.9%) - 14 days Decreased growth &lt;10 Butler et al. 1975a&lt;br /&gt;Euglenoid,&lt;br /&gt;Euglena elastica&lt;br /&gt;- - 72 hr Decreased ATP&lt;br /&gt;content&lt;br /&gt;100,000 Clegg and Koevenig&lt;br /&gt;1974&lt;br /&gt;Duckweed,&lt;br /&gt;Wolffia papulifera&lt;br /&gt;(97%) - 11 days Lethal 100,000 Worthley and Schott&lt;br /&gt;1971&lt;br /&gt;Duckweed,&lt;br /&gt;Wolffia papulifera&lt;br /&gt;(97%) - 11 days Teratogenic&lt;br /&gt;effects&lt;br /&gt;10,000 Worthley and Schott&lt;br /&gt;1971&lt;br /&gt;Protozan,&lt;br /&gt;Paramecium caudatum&lt;br /&gt;- - 1 hr LC50 .3,000 Evtugyn et al. 1997&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentratio&lt;br /&gt;n&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Rotifer,&lt;br /&gt;Brachionus calyciflorus&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92%)&lt;br /&gt;80-100 24 hr LC50 29,220 Fernandez-&lt;br /&gt;Casalderrey et al.&lt;br /&gt;1992a&lt;br /&gt;Rotifer (16-18 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Brachionus calyciflorus&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92%)&lt;br /&gt;80-100 5 hr Reduced (50%)&lt;br /&gt;filtration and&lt;br /&gt;ingestion ratios&lt;br /&gt;14,000 Fernandez-&lt;br /&gt;Casalderrey et al.&lt;br /&gt;1992b&lt;br /&gt;Rotifer (&lt;2 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Brachionus calyciflorus&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92%)&lt;br /&gt;80-100 10 days Decreased&lt;br /&gt;reproduction&lt;br /&gt;&lt;5,000 Fernandez-&lt;br /&gt;Casalderrey et al.&lt;br /&gt;1992c&lt;br /&gt;Rotifer (&lt;2 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Brachionus calyciflorus&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(99%)&lt;br /&gt;80-100 4.04 days LT50 5,000 Fernandez-Casalderry&lt;br /&gt;et al. 1992d&lt;br /&gt;Rotifer (&lt;2 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Brachionus calyciflorus&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(99%)&lt;br /&gt;80-100 4.66 days LT50 7,000 Fernandez-&lt;br /&gt;Casalderrey et al.&lt;br /&gt;1992d&lt;br /&gt;Rotifer (&lt;2 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Brachionus calyciflorus&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(99%)&lt;br /&gt;80-100 2.49 days LT50 14,000 Fernandez-Casalderry&lt;br /&gt;et al. 1992d&lt;br /&gt;Rotifer (&lt;2 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Brachionus calyciflorus&lt;br /&gt;- 80-100 48 hr NOEC&lt;br /&gt;Reproduction&lt;br /&gt;8,000 Snell and Moffat&lt;br /&gt;1992&lt;br /&gt;Rotifer (&lt;2 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Brachionus calyciflorus&lt;br /&gt;- 80-100 48 hr NOEC Ingestion 20,000 Juchelka and Snell&lt;br /&gt;1994&lt;br /&gt;Oligochaete worm,&lt;br /&gt;Lumbriculus variegatus&lt;br /&gt;- - 4 hr Lethal 20,000 Rogge and Drewes&lt;br /&gt;1993&lt;br /&gt;Tubificid worm,&lt;br /&gt;Branchiura sowerbyi&lt;br /&gt;- - 96 hr LC50 2,220 Chatterjee and Konar&lt;br /&gt;1984&lt;br /&gt;Snail,&lt;br /&gt;(Physa acuta)&lt;br /&gt;- - 48 hr LC50 4,800 Hashimoto and&lt;br /&gt;Nishiuchi 1981&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentratio&lt;br /&gt;n&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;6 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;40 7 days No effect on&lt;br /&gt;survival or&lt;br /&gt;reproduction&lt;br /&gt;0.220 Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;6 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(85%)&lt;br /&gt;40 7 days Lethal 0.520 Norberg-King 1987&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;- 202 50 hr EC50 4.3 Anderson 1959&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (adult),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;- - 24 hr Adhesion of&lt;br /&gt;algal particles&lt;br /&gt;on 2nd antennae&lt;br /&gt;and&lt;br /&gt;immobilization&lt;br /&gt;1 Stratton and Corke&lt;br /&gt;1981&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Analytical&lt;br /&gt;(95%)&lt;br /&gt;200 21 days Reduced&lt;br /&gt;reproduction and&lt;br /&gt;mobility&lt;br /&gt;0.3 Dortland 1980&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Analytical&lt;br /&gt;(99%)&lt;br /&gt;200 21 days No reduction in&lt;br /&gt;reproduction or&lt;br /&gt;mobility&lt;br /&gt;0.2 Dortland 1980&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Analytical&lt;br /&gt;(99%)&lt;br /&gt;200 21 days EC50&lt;br /&gt;(immobilization)&lt;br /&gt;0.22 Dortland 1980&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Analytical&lt;br /&gt;(99%)&lt;br /&gt;200 21 days EC50&lt;br /&gt;(immobilization)&lt;br /&gt;0.24 Dortland 1980&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Analytical&lt;br /&gt;(99%)&lt;br /&gt;200 21 days EC50&lt;br /&gt;(immobilization)&lt;br /&gt;0.7 Dortland 1980&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Analytical&lt;br /&gt;(99%)&lt;br /&gt;200 21 days EC50&lt;br /&gt;(immobilization)&lt;br /&gt;0.8 Dortland 1980&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentratio&lt;br /&gt;n&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Insecticidal&lt;br /&gt;soap&lt;br /&gt;- 48 hr LC50 0.74 Mitchell 1985&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Insecticidal&lt;br /&gt;soap&lt;br /&gt;- 96 hr LC50 0.21 Mitchell 1985&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (adult),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 3 hr LC50 7.8 Nishiuchi and&lt;br /&gt;Hashimoto 1967&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran,&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 3 hr LC50 80 Hashimoto and&lt;br /&gt;Nishiuchi 1981&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran,&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92%)&lt;br /&gt;- 5 hr Reduced (50%)&lt;br /&gt;filtration rate&lt;br /&gt;0.47 Fernandez-&lt;br /&gt;Casalderrey et al.&lt;br /&gt;1994&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92%)&lt;br /&gt;250 21 days NOEC survival 0.15 Fernandez-&lt;br /&gt;Casalderrey et al.&lt;br /&gt;1995&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92%)&lt;br /&gt;250 21 days LOEC survival 0.18 Fernandez-&lt;br /&gt;Casalderrey et al.&lt;br /&gt;1995&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (&lt;24 hr),&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92%)&lt;br /&gt;250 21 days LOEC&lt;br /&gt;reproduction&lt;br /&gt;0.15 Fernandez-&lt;br /&gt;Casalderrey et al.&lt;br /&gt;1995&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran,&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna&lt;br /&gt;Optimum 160-180 30 min IC50 0.45 Fort et al. 1996&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran,&lt;br /&gt;(Daphnia pulex)&lt;br /&gt;- - 3 hr LC50 80 Hashimoto and&lt;br /&gt;Nishiuchi 1981&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran,&lt;br /&gt;(Daphnia pulex)&lt;br /&gt;- - 3 hr LC50 7.8 Nishiuchi and&lt;br /&gt;Hashimoto 1967&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentratio&lt;br /&gt;n&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran (adult),&lt;br /&gt;Moina macrocopa&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 3 hr LC50 26 Nishiuchi and&lt;br /&gt;Hashimoto 1967&lt;br /&gt;Cladoceran,&lt;br /&gt;Moina macrocopa&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 3 hr LC50 50 Hashimoto and&lt;br /&gt;Nishiuchi 1981&lt;br /&gt;Copepod,&lt;br /&gt;Cyclops vividis&lt;br /&gt;- - 96 hr LC50 2,600 Chatterjee and Konar&lt;br /&gt;1984&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (adult),&lt;br /&gt;Hyalella azteca&lt;br /&gt;Technical 160-180 48 hr LC50 19&lt;br /&gt;(measured)&lt;br /&gt;Werner and Nagel&lt;br /&gt;1997&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (0-2 days),&lt;br /&gt;Hyalella azteca&lt;br /&gt;Technical 40 96 hr LC50 6.2 Collyard et al. 1994&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (2-4 days),&lt;br /&gt;Hyalella azteca&lt;br /&gt;Technical 40 96 hr LC50 4.2 Collyard et al. 1994&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (6-8 days),&lt;br /&gt;Hyalella azteca&lt;br /&gt;Technical 40 96 hr LC50 4.3 Collyard et al. 1994&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (8-10 days),&lt;br /&gt;Hyalella azteca&lt;br /&gt;Technical 40 96 hr LC50 4.4 Collyard et al. 1994&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (12-14 days),&lt;br /&gt;Hyalella azteca&lt;br /&gt;Technical 40 96 hr LC50 3.8 Collyard et al. 1994&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (16-18 days),&lt;br /&gt;Hyalella azteca&lt;br /&gt;Technical 40 96 hr LC50 4.4 Collyard et al. 1994&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (20-22 days),&lt;br /&gt;Hyalella azteca&lt;br /&gt;Technical 40 96 hr LC50 4.6 Collyard et al. 1994&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (24-26 days),&lt;br /&gt;Hyalella azteca&lt;br /&gt;Technical 40 96 hr LC50 4.6 Collyard et al. 1994&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (2 mo.),&lt;br /&gt;Gammarus lacustris&lt;br /&gt;- - 96 hr LC50 200 Sanders 1969&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentratio&lt;br /&gt;n&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Crayfish,&lt;br /&gt;Procambarus clarkii&lt;br /&gt;- - 7 days BCF = 4.9 10 Kanazawa 1978&lt;br /&gt;Stonefly (nymph),&lt;br /&gt;Pteronarcys&lt;br /&gt;californicus&lt;br /&gt;- - 48 hr EC50 74 Cope 1965a&lt;br /&gt;Caddisfly (larva),&lt;br /&gt;Hydropsyche morosa&lt;br /&gt;- - 6 hr LC50 2,500 Fredeen 1972&lt;br /&gt;Caddisfly (larva),&lt;br /&gt;Hydropsyche morosa&lt;br /&gt;- - 6 hr LC50 500 Fredeen 1972&lt;br /&gt;Caddisfly (larva),&lt;br /&gt;Hydropsyche recurvata&lt;br /&gt;- - 6 hr LC50 &gt;500 Freeden 1972&lt;br /&gt;Caddisfly (larva),&lt;br /&gt;Hydropsyche recurvata&lt;br /&gt;- - 6 hr LC50 &gt;500 Freeden 1972&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito (4th instar),&lt;br /&gt;Aedes aegypti&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 350 Klassen et al. 1965&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito (3rd-4th&lt;br /&gt;instar),&lt;br /&gt;Culex pipiens fatigans&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 61 Chen et al. 1971&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito (3rd-4th&lt;br /&gt;instar),&lt;br /&gt;Culex pipiens fatigans&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 80 Chen et al. 1971&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito (4th instar),&lt;br /&gt;Culex pipiens fatigans&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 3.5 Yasuno and&lt;br /&gt;Kerdpibule 1967&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito (4th instar),&lt;br /&gt;Culex pipiens fatigans&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 5.7 Yasuno and&lt;br /&gt;Kerdpibule 1967&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentratio&lt;br /&gt;n&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito (4th instar),&lt;br /&gt;Culex pipiens fatigans&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 2.2 Yasuno and&lt;br /&gt;Kerdpibule 1967&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito (4th instar),&lt;br /&gt;Culex pipiens fatigans&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 3.2 Yasuno and&lt;br /&gt;Kerdpibule 1967&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito (4th instar),&lt;br /&gt;Culex pipiens fatigans&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 4.6 Yasuno and&lt;br /&gt;Kerdpibule 1967&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito (4th instar),&lt;br /&gt;Culex pipiens fatigans&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 4.5 Yasuno and&lt;br /&gt;Kerdpibule 1967&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito (4th instar),&lt;br /&gt;Culex pipiens fatigans&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 1.9 Yasuno and&lt;br /&gt;Kerdpibule 1967&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito (4th instar),&lt;br /&gt;Culex pipiens fatigans&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 1.8 Yasuno and&lt;br /&gt;Kerdpibule 1967&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito (4th instar),&lt;br /&gt;Culex pipiens fatigans&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 5.4 Yasuno and&lt;br /&gt;Kerdpibule 1967&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito (4th instar),&lt;br /&gt;Culex pipiens fatigans&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 3.5 Yasuno and&lt;br /&gt;Kerdpibule 1967&lt;br /&gt;Midge (1st instar),&lt;br /&gt;Chironomus riparius&lt;br /&gt;Analytical&lt;br /&gt;(99.7%)&lt;br /&gt;- 96 hr LC50 (fed) 23 Stuijfzand et al.&lt;br /&gt;2000&lt;br /&gt;Midge (4th instar),&lt;br /&gt;Chironomus riparius&lt;br /&gt;Analytical&lt;br /&gt;(99.7%)&lt;br /&gt;- 96 hr LC50 (fed) 167 Stuijfzand et al.&lt;br /&gt;2000&lt;br /&gt;Salmonidae Emulsible&lt;br /&gt;concentrate&lt;br /&gt;(60%)&lt;br /&gt;- 96 hr LC50 8,000 Ciba-Geigy 1976&lt;br /&gt;Brown Trout (3.22 g),&lt;br /&gt;Salma trutta lacustris&lt;br /&gt;- - 96 hr LC50 602 Swedberg 1973&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentratio&lt;br /&gt;n&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Cutthroat trout (0.52&lt;br /&gt;g),&lt;br /&gt;Oncorhynchus clarki&lt;br /&gt;- - 96 hr LC50 3,850 Swedberg 1973&lt;br /&gt;Cutthroat trout (2.02&lt;br /&gt;g),&lt;br /&gt;Oncorhynchus clarki&lt;br /&gt;- - 96 hr LC50 2,760 Swedberg 1973&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow trout (fry),&lt;br /&gt;Oncorhynchus mykiss&lt;br /&gt;Insecticidal&lt;br /&gt;soap&lt;br /&gt;- 96 hr LC50 20 Mitchell 1985&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow trout,&lt;br /&gt;Oncorhynchus mykiss&lt;br /&gt;- - 48 hr EC50 170 Cope 1965a&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow trout (16 g),&lt;br /&gt;Oncorhynchus mykiss&lt;br /&gt;Synthesized - 14 days BCF = 62 15 Seguchi and Asaka&lt;br /&gt;1981&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow trout,&lt;br /&gt;Oncorhynchus mykiss&lt;br /&gt;Analytical 360 28 days NOEC 200 Bresch 1991&lt;br /&gt;Goldfish (4.01 cm),&lt;br /&gt;Carassius auratus&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 48 hr LC50 5,100 Nishiuchi and&lt;br /&gt;Hashimoto 1967;&lt;br /&gt;Hashimoto and&lt;br /&gt;Nishiuchi 1981&lt;br /&gt;Carp,&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinus carpio&lt;br /&gt;- - 7 days BCF = 65.1 10 Kanazawa 1978&lt;br /&gt;Carp (4.2 cm),&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinus carpio&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 72 hr LC50 2,000 Nishiuchi and Asano&lt;br /&gt;1981&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentratio&lt;br /&gt;n&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Carp (6.0 cm),&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinus carpio&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 48 hr LC50 3,200 Nishiuchi and&lt;br /&gt;Hashimoto 1967;&lt;br /&gt;Hashimoto and&lt;br /&gt;Nishiuchi 1981;&lt;br /&gt;Nishiuchi and Asano&lt;br /&gt;1981&lt;br /&gt;Carp (8 g),&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinus carpio&lt;br /&gt;Synthesized - 14 days BCF = 120 18 Seguchi and Asaka&lt;br /&gt;1981&lt;br /&gt;Carp (1.1-1.4 g),&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinus carpio&lt;br /&gt;- - 72 hr LC50 1,420 Dutt and Guha 1988&lt;br /&gt;Carp (24-35 g),&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinus carpio&lt;br /&gt;Reagent&lt;br /&gt;(98%)&lt;br /&gt;- 7 days BCF = 20.9 2.4 Tsuda et al. 1990&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow (larva),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(88.2%)&lt;br /&gt;44-49 7 days No reduction in&lt;br /&gt;growth or&lt;br /&gt;survival&lt;br /&gt;277 Norberg-King 1989&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow&lt;br /&gt;(embryo-larva),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(88.2%)&lt;br /&gt;44-49 12 days No reduction in&lt;br /&gt;growth or&lt;br /&gt;survival&lt;br /&gt;285 Norberg-King 1989&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow (larva),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(88.2%)&lt;br /&gt;44-49 7 days Reduction in dry&lt;br /&gt;weight&lt;br /&gt;347 Norberg-King 1989&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow (larva),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(88.2%)&lt;br /&gt;44-49 7 days Reduction in dry&lt;br /&gt;weight&lt;br /&gt;277 Norberg-King 1989&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow (newly&lt;br /&gt;hatched larvae),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;Encapsulated&lt;br /&gt;formulation&lt;br /&gt;(fresh stock)&lt;br /&gt;45.8 96 hr LC50 6,100 Jarvinen and Tanner&lt;br /&gt;1982&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentratio&lt;br /&gt;n&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow (newly&lt;br /&gt;hatched larvae),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;Encapsulated&lt;br /&gt;formulation&lt;br /&gt;(11 week-old&lt;br /&gt;stock)&lt;br /&gt;45.8 96 hr LC50 5,100 Jarvinen and Tanner&lt;br /&gt;1982&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow&lt;br /&gt;(embryo-larva),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;Encapsulated&lt;br /&gt;formulation&lt;br /&gt;45.8 32 days No effect on&lt;br /&gt;weight&lt;br /&gt;40 Jarvinen and Tanner&lt;br /&gt;1982&lt;br /&gt;Fathead minnow&lt;br /&gt;(embryo-larva),&lt;br /&gt;Pimephales promelas&lt;br /&gt;Encapsulated&lt;br /&gt;formulation&lt;br /&gt;45.8 32 days Significant&lt;br /&gt;reduction in&lt;br /&gt;weight&lt;br /&gt;76 Jarvinen and Tanner&lt;br /&gt;1982&lt;br /&gt;Ide&lt;br /&gt;Leucisuc idus&lt;br /&gt;Emulsifiable&lt;br /&gt;concentrate&lt;br /&gt;(60%)&lt;br /&gt;- 96 hr LC50 150 Ciba-Geigy 1976&lt;br /&gt;Catfish&lt;br /&gt;Ictalurus sp.&lt;br /&gt;Emulsifiable&lt;br /&gt;concentrate&lt;br /&gt;(60%)&lt;br /&gt;- 96 hr LC50 8,000 Ciba-Geigy 1976&lt;br /&gt;Flagfish (larvajuvenile),&lt;br /&gt;Jordanella floridae&lt;br /&gt;- - 21-day&lt;br /&gt;pulsed dose&lt;br /&gt;+ recovery&lt;br /&gt;Decreased egg&lt;br /&gt;production&lt;br /&gt;290 Allison 1977&lt;br /&gt;Flagfish (juvenileadult),&lt;br /&gt;Jordanella floridae&lt;br /&gt;- - 21-day&lt;br /&gt;pulsed dose&lt;br /&gt;+ recovery&lt;br /&gt;Decreased&lt;br /&gt;parental&lt;br /&gt;survival&lt;br /&gt;250 Allison 1977&lt;br /&gt;Flagfish (adultspawning),&lt;br /&gt;Jordanella floridae&lt;br /&gt;- - 21-day&lt;br /&gt;pulsed dose&lt;br /&gt;+ recovery&lt;br /&gt;Decreased&lt;br /&gt;survival of&lt;br /&gt;parents and&lt;br /&gt;larvae&lt;br /&gt;1,170 Allison 1977&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentratio&lt;br /&gt;n&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Oriental weatherfish,&lt;br /&gt;Misqurnus&lt;br /&gt;anguillicaudatus&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 48 hr LC50 500 Hashimoto and&lt;br /&gt;Nishiuchi 1981&lt;br /&gt;Oriental weatherfish&lt;br /&gt;(2.6 g),&lt;br /&gt;Misgurnus&lt;br /&gt;anguillicaudatus&lt;br /&gt;Synthesized - 14 days BCF = 28 14 Seguchi and Asaka&lt;br /&gt;1981&lt;br /&gt;Guppy (7 wk),&lt;br /&gt;Poecilia reticulata&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 3,700 Chen et al. 1971&lt;br /&gt;Guppy (7 wk),&lt;br /&gt;Poecilia reticulata&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 24 hr LC50 3,800 Chen et al. 1971&lt;br /&gt;Guppy (7 wk),&lt;br /&gt;Poecilia reticulata&lt;br /&gt;Technical - 30 min Loss of&lt;br /&gt;equilibrium&lt;br /&gt;7,000 Chen et al. 1971&lt;br /&gt;Guppy,&lt;br /&gt;Poecilia reticulata&lt;br /&gt;Emulsifiable&lt;br /&gt;concentrate&lt;br /&gt;(60%)&lt;br /&gt;- 96 hr LC50 3,000 Ciba-Geigy 1976&lt;br /&gt;Guppy,&lt;br /&gt;Poecilia reticulata&lt;br /&gt;- - 7 days BCF = 17.5 10 Kanazawa 1978&lt;br /&gt;Guppy (2-3 mon),&lt;br /&gt;Poecilia reticulata&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(99%)&lt;br /&gt;100 3 days Lethal body&lt;br /&gt;burden&lt;br /&gt;2,495 Ohayo-Mitoko and&lt;br /&gt;Deneer 1993&lt;br /&gt;Guppy (2-3 mon),&lt;br /&gt;Poecilia reticulata&lt;br /&gt;- 75 24 hr Lethal body&lt;br /&gt;burden&lt;br /&gt;(@ 4,330 μg/l&lt;br /&gt;exposure)&lt;br /&gt;2.1 (μmol/g) Deneer et al. 1999&lt;br /&gt;Guppy (2-3 mon),&lt;br /&gt;Poecilia reticulata&lt;br /&gt;- 75 7 days Lethal body&lt;br /&gt;burden (@ 2,420&lt;br /&gt;μg/L exposure)&lt;br /&gt;1.8 (μmol/g) Deneer et al. 1999&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentratio&lt;br /&gt;n&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Tilapia,&lt;br /&gt;Tilapia sp.&lt;br /&gt;- - 48 hr LC50 1,492 Li and Chen 1981&lt;br /&gt;Mozambique tilapia (5-9&lt;br /&gt;g),&lt;br /&gt;Tilapia mossambica&lt;br /&gt;Technical - - LC100 15,850 Mustafa et al. 1982&lt;br /&gt;Mozambique tilapia&lt;br /&gt;(3.56 g),&lt;br /&gt;Tilapia mossambica&lt;br /&gt;- - 96 hr LC50 2,280 Chatterjee and Konar&lt;br /&gt;1984&lt;br /&gt;Mozambique tilapia (1.4&lt;br /&gt;g),&lt;br /&gt;Tilapia mossambica&lt;br /&gt;- - 72 hr LC50 2,880 Dutt and Guha 1988&lt;br /&gt;Bluegill,&lt;br /&gt;Lepomis macrochirus&lt;br /&gt;- - 48 hr EC50 30 Cope 1965a&lt;br /&gt;Bluegill,&lt;br /&gt;Lepomis macrochirus&lt;br /&gt;Basudin&lt;br /&gt;(93%)&lt;br /&gt;- 48 hr LC50 1,493 Li and Chen 1981&lt;br /&gt;Experimental stream&lt;br /&gt;community&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92.5%)&lt;br /&gt;170-195 84 days Increased drift&lt;br /&gt;rates for&lt;br /&gt;Hyalella&lt;br /&gt;0.3 Arthur et al. 1983&lt;br /&gt;Experimental stream&lt;br /&gt;community&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(92.5%)&lt;br /&gt;170-195 112 days Reduced Hyalella&lt;br /&gt;populations&lt;br /&gt;5 Arthur et al. 1983&lt;br /&gt;Experimental pond&lt;br /&gt;community&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(88%)&lt;br /&gt;70-150 70 days NOEC for&lt;br /&gt;phytoplankton&lt;br /&gt;and periphyton&lt;br /&gt;chlorophyll, and&lt;br /&gt;macrophyte&lt;br /&gt;biomass&lt;br /&gt;443 Giddings et al. 1996&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Hardness&lt;br /&gt;(mg/L as&lt;br /&gt;CaCO3) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentratio&lt;br /&gt;n&lt;br /&gt;(μg/L)&lt;br /&gt;Reference&lt;br /&gt;Experimental pond&lt;br /&gt;community&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(88%)&lt;br /&gt;70-150 70 days LOEC for&lt;br /&gt;Cladocera,&lt;br /&gt;Pentaneurcini,&lt;br /&gt;and&lt;br /&gt;Ceratopogonidae&lt;br /&gt;abundance&lt;br /&gt;2.4 Giddings et al. 1996&lt;br /&gt;Experimental pond&lt;br /&gt;community&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(88%)&lt;br /&gt;70-150 70 days LOEC for&lt;br /&gt;zooplankton and&lt;br /&gt;macroinvertebrat&lt;br /&gt;e taxonomic&lt;br /&gt;richness&lt;br /&gt;9.2 Giddings et al. 1996&lt;br /&gt;Experimental pond&lt;br /&gt;community&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(88%)&lt;br /&gt;70-150 70 days Reduced bluegill&lt;br /&gt;sunfish biomass&lt;br /&gt;22 Giddings et al. 1996&lt;br /&gt;Experimental pond&lt;br /&gt;community&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;(88%)&lt;br /&gt;70-150 70 days Reduced bluegill&lt;br /&gt;sunfish survival&lt;br /&gt;54 Giddings et al. 1996&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Salinity&lt;br /&gt;(g/kg) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentrati&lt;br /&gt;on (ug/L) Reference&lt;br /&gt;SALTWATER SPECIES&lt;br /&gt;Natural photoplankton - - 4 hr 6.8% decrease in&lt;br /&gt;photosynthesis&lt;br /&gt;1,000 Butler 1963&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Salinity&lt;br /&gt;(g/kg) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentrati&lt;br /&gt;on (ug/L) Reference&lt;br /&gt;Red alga,&lt;br /&gt;Chondrus crispus&lt;br /&gt;(12.5%) - 24 hr&lt;br /&gt;exposure 18&lt;br /&gt;day holding&lt;br /&gt;No effect on&lt;br /&gt;growth&lt;br /&gt;10,000 Shacklock &amp; Croft 1981&lt;br /&gt;Red alga,&lt;br /&gt;Champia parvula&lt;br /&gt;(96%) - 48 hr&lt;br /&gt;exposure&lt;br /&gt;No effect on&lt;br /&gt;sexual&lt;br /&gt;reproduction&lt;br /&gt;1,000 Thursby &amp; Tagliabue&lt;br /&gt;1988&lt;br /&gt;Rotifer,&lt;br /&gt;Brachionus plicatilis&lt;br /&gt;(96%) - 24 hr LC50 55,100 Thursby &amp; Berry 1988&lt;br /&gt;Rotifer,&lt;br /&gt;Brachionus plicatilis&lt;br /&gt;Standard&lt;br /&gt;($95%)&lt;br /&gt;- 24 hr EC50 28,000 Guzzella et al. 1997&lt;br /&gt;Snail,&lt;br /&gt;Lacuna vincta&lt;br /&gt;(12.5%) - 3 hr&lt;br /&gt;exposure, 48&lt;br /&gt;hr holding&lt;br /&gt;88% mortality 1,000 Shacklock &amp; Croft 1981&lt;br /&gt;Snail,&lt;br /&gt;Lacuna vincta&lt;br /&gt;(12.5%) - 3 hr&lt;br /&gt;exposure, 48&lt;br /&gt;hr holding&lt;br /&gt;75% mortality 10,000 Shacklock &amp; Croft 1981&lt;br /&gt;Eastern oyster,&lt;br /&gt;Crassostrea virginica&lt;br /&gt;- - 96 hr No decrease in&lt;br /&gt;shell growth&lt;br /&gt;1,000 Butler 1963; Mayer&lt;br /&gt;1987&lt;br /&gt;Eastern oyster&lt;br /&gt;(5-10 cm height),&lt;br /&gt;Crassostrea virginica&lt;br /&gt;Technical and&lt;br /&gt;14C- labeled&lt;br /&gt;- 96 hr LC50 shell growth 1,115 Williams 1989&lt;br /&gt;Eastern oyster&lt;br /&gt;(6-10 cm height),&lt;br /&gt;Crassostrea virginica&lt;br /&gt;Technical and&lt;br /&gt;14C-labeled&lt;br /&gt;- 5 days BFC = 56 100 Williams 1989&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (adult),&lt;br /&gt;Ampelisea aldita&lt;br /&gt;Technical 25 48 hr LC50 10 Werner &amp; Nagel 1997&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod,&lt;br /&gt;Gammarus oceanicus&lt;br /&gt;(12.5%) - 3 hr&lt;br /&gt;exposure&lt;br /&gt;100% mortality 1,000 Shacklock &amp; Croft 1981&lt;br /&gt;Table 6. (continued)&lt;br /&gt;Species Chemicala&lt;br /&gt;Salinity&lt;br /&gt;(g/kg) Duration Effect&lt;br /&gt;Concentrati&lt;br /&gt;on (ug/L) Reference&lt;br /&gt;Amphipod (adult),&lt;br /&gt;Rhepoxynius abronius&lt;br /&gt;Technical 31 24 hr LC50 9.2 Werner &amp; Nagel 1997&lt;br /&gt;Isopod,&lt;br /&gt;Idotea baltica&lt;br /&gt;(12.5%) - 3 hr&lt;br /&gt;exposure&lt;br /&gt;100% mortality 1,000 Shacklock &amp; Croft 1981&lt;br /&gt;Brown shrimp,&lt;br /&gt;Penaeus aztecus&lt;br /&gt;- - 24 hr EC50 44 Butler 1963&lt;br /&gt;Brown shrimp,&lt;br /&gt;Penaeus aztecus&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;95.1% pure&lt;br /&gt;- 48 hr EC50 28 Mayer 1987&lt;br /&gt;Grass shrimp,&lt;br /&gt;Palaemonetes pugio&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;95.1% pure&lt;br /&gt;- 48 hr EC50 28 Mayer 1987&lt;br /&gt;White mullet,&lt;br /&gt;Mugil curema&lt;br /&gt;- - 24 &amp; 48 hr LC50 250 Butler 1963&lt;br /&gt;Striped mullet,&lt;br /&gt;Mugil cephalus&lt;br /&gt;Technical&lt;br /&gt;95.1% pure&lt;br /&gt;- 48 hr LC50 150 Mayer 1987&lt;br /&gt;Sheepshead minnow,&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinodon variegatus&lt;br /&gt;92.6% pure - 108 days Decrease in&lt;br /&gt;acetylcholinester&lt;br /&gt;ase activity&lt;br /&gt;0.47 Goodman et al. 1979;&lt;br /&gt;Mayer 1987&lt;br /&gt;a Percent purity is listed in parentheses when available.&lt;br /&gt;52&lt;br /&gt;REFERENCES&lt;br /&gt;Adlung, K.G. 1957. Zur toxizitat insektizider und akarizider wirkstoffe fur&lt;br /&gt;fische. Die Naturwissenschaften 44:471-472.&lt;br /&gt;Agrochemicals Handbook, 1991. Third Edition, The Royal Society of Chemistry.&lt;br /&gt;Alabaster, J.S. 1969. Survival of fish in 164 herbicides, insecticides,&lt;br /&gt;fungicides, wetting agents and miscellaneous substances. Int. Pest. Control&lt;br /&gt;11:29-35.&lt;br /&gt;Alam, M.K. and O.E Maughan. 1992. The effect of malathion, diazinon and&lt;br /&gt;various concentrations of zinc, copper, nickel, lead, iron and mercury on&lt;br /&gt;fish. Biol. Trace Element Res. 34:225-236.&lt;br /&gt;Alam, M.K. and O.E. Maughan. 1993. Acute toxicity of selected organophosphorus&lt;br /&gt;pesticides to Cyprinus carpio and Barilius vagra. J. Environ. Sci. Health&lt;br /&gt;28B:81-89.&lt;br /&gt;Alam, M.G.M., S.A.M. Al-Arabi, G.C. Halder and M.A. Mazid. 1995. Toxicity of&lt;br /&gt;diazinon to the fry of Indian major carp Cirrhina mrigala (Hamilton).&lt;br /&gt;Bangladesh J. Zool. 23:183-186.&lt;br /&gt;Albert, A. 1981. Selective toxicity: The physio-chemical basis of therapy. 6th&lt;br /&gt;ed. The Chaucer Press Ltd., Bungay, Suffolk, England.&lt;br /&gt;Allender, W.J. and A.G. Britt. 1994. Analysis of liquid diazinon formulations&lt;br /&gt;and breakdown products: An Australia-wide survey. Bull. Environ. Contam.&lt;br /&gt;Toxicol. 53:902-906.&lt;br /&gt;Allison, D.T. 1977. Use of exposure units for estimating aquatic toxicity of&lt;br /&gt;organophosphate pesticides. EPA-600/3-77-077. National Technical Information&lt;br /&gt;Service, Springfield, VA.&lt;br /&gt;Allison, D.T. and R.O. Hermanutz. 1977. Toxicity of diazinon to brook trout&lt;br /&gt;and fathead minnows. PB-269 293 or EPA-600/3-77-060. National Technical&lt;br /&gt;Information Service, Springfield, VA.&lt;br /&gt;Amato, J.R., D.I. Mount, E.J. Durhan, M.T. Lukasewycz, G.T. Ankley and E.D.&lt;br /&gt;Robert. 1992. An example of the identification of diazinon as a primary&lt;br /&gt;toxicant in an effluent. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 11:209-216.&lt;br /&gt;Anderson, B.G. 1959. The toxicity of organic insecticides to Daphnia. Trans.&lt;br /&gt;2nd Sem. Biol. Probl. Water Pollut. U.S. Public Health Serv., Cincinnati, OH.&lt;br /&gt;pp. 94-95.&lt;br /&gt;Anees, M.A. 1974. Changes in starch-gel electrophoretic pattern of serum&lt;br /&gt;proteins of a freshwater teleost Channa punctatus (Bloch), exposed to&lt;br /&gt;sublethal and chronic levels of three organophosphorus insecticides. Ceylon J.&lt;br /&gt;Sci. (Biol. Sci.) 11:53-58.&lt;br /&gt;53&lt;br /&gt;Anees, M.A. 1976. Intestional pathology in a freshwater teleost, Channa&lt;br /&gt;punctatus (Bloch) exposed to sub-lethal and chronic levels of three&lt;br /&gt;organophosphorus insecticides. Acta Physiol. Latin. Amer. 26:67-71.&lt;br /&gt;Anees, M.A. 1978. Haematological abnormalities in a freshwater teleost, Channa&lt;br /&gt;punctatus (Bloch), exposed to sublethal and chronic levels of three&lt;br /&gt;organophosphorus insecticides. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 4:53-60.&lt;br /&gt;Anjum, F. and M.K.J. Siddiqui. 1990. In vitro inhibition of fish ( Tilapia&lt;br /&gt;mossambica) brain Ca2+-ATPase by monocrotophos, dimethoate, diazinon and DDT.&lt;br /&gt;Indian J. Exp. Biol. 28:488-489.&lt;br /&gt;Ankley, G.T. and S.A. Collyard. 1995. Influence of piperonyl butoxide on the&lt;br /&gt;toxicity of organophosphate insecticides to three species of freshwater&lt;br /&gt;benthic invertebrates. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 110C:149-155.&lt;br /&gt;Ankley, G.T., J.R. Dierkes, D.A. Jensen and G.S. Peterson. 1991. Piperonyl&lt;br /&gt;butoxide as a tool in aquatic toxicological research with organophosphate&lt;br /&gt;insecticides. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 21:266-274.&lt;br /&gt;Ansari, B.A. and K. Kumar. 1988. Diazinon toxicity: Effect on protein and&lt;br /&gt;nucleic acid metabolism in the liver of zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio&lt;br /&gt;(Cyprinidae). Sci. Total Environ. 76:63-68.&lt;br /&gt;Ansari, B.A., M. Aslam and K. Kumar. 1987. Diazinon toxicity: Activities of&lt;br /&gt;acetylcholinesterase and phosphatases in the nervous tissue of zebra fish,&lt;br /&gt;Brachydanio rerio (Cyprinidae). Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol. 15:301-306.&lt;br /&gt;Applegate, V.C., J.H. Howell, A.E. Hall, Jr. and M.A. Smith. 1957. Toxicity of&lt;br /&gt;4,346 chemicals to larval lampreys and fishes. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv.&lt;br /&gt;Special Scientific Report - Fisheries No. 207.&lt;br /&gt;Arab, A.E.E., A. Attar, L. Ballhorn, D. Freitag and F. Korte. 1990. Behavior&lt;br /&gt;of diazinon in a perch species. Chemosphere 21:193-199.&lt;br /&gt;Arienzo, M., T. Crisanto, M.J. Sanchez-Martin, and M. Sanchez-Camazano. 1994a.&lt;br /&gt;Effect of soil characteristics on adsorption and mobility of (14 C) diazinon.&lt;br /&gt;J. Agric. Food Chem. 42:1803-1808.&lt;br /&gt;Arienzo, M., M. Sanchez-Camazano, M.J. Sanchez-Martin, and T. Crisanto. 1994b.&lt;br /&gt;Influence of exogenous organic matter in the mobility of diazinon in soils.&lt;br /&gt;Chemosphere 29:1245-1252.&lt;br /&gt;Ariyoshi, T., S. Shiiba, H. Hasegawa and K. Arizono. 1990. Profile of metalbinding&lt;br /&gt;proteins and hemo oxygenase in red carp treated with heavy metals,&lt;br /&gt;pesticides and surfactants. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 44:643-649.&lt;br /&gt;Arthur, J.W., J.A. Zischke, K.A. Allen and R.O. Hermantuz. 1983. Effects of&lt;br /&gt;diazinon on macroinvertebrates and insect emergence in outdoor experimental&lt;br /&gt;channels. Aquatic Toxicol. 4:283-301.&lt;br /&gt;Asaka, A., M. Sakai and N. Tan. 1980. Influences of certain environmental&lt;br /&gt;54&lt;br /&gt;factors on fish toxicity of cartap. J. Takeda Res. Lab 39:28-33.&lt;br /&gt;Bailey, H.C., C. DiGiorgio, K. Kroll, J.L Miller, D.E. Hinton and G. Starret.&lt;br /&gt;1996. Development of procedures for identifying pesticide toxicity in ambient&lt;br /&gt;waters: Carbofuran, diazinon, chlorpyrifos. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15:837-&lt;br /&gt;845.&lt;br /&gt;Bailey, H.C., J.L. Miller, M.J. Miller, L.C. Wiborg, L. Deanovic, and T. Shed.&lt;br /&gt;1997. Joint acute toxicity of diazinon and chlorpyrifes to Ceriodaphnia dubia.&lt;br /&gt;Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16:2304-2308.&lt;br /&gt;Bailey, H.C., L. Deanovic, E. Reyes, T. Kimball, K. Larson, K. Cortright, V.&lt;br /&gt;Connor and D.E. Hinton. 2000. Diazinon and chlorpyrifos in urban waterways in&lt;br /&gt;northern California, USA. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19(1): 82-87.&lt;br /&gt;Bajpai, V.N. and S.L. Perti. 1969. Resistance to malathion. Pesticides 3:43-&lt;br /&gt;45.&lt;br /&gt;Bathe, R., K. Sachsse, L. Ullmann, W.D. Hormann, F. Zak and R. Hess. 1975a.&lt;br /&gt;The evaluation of fish toxicity in the laboratory. Proc. Eur. Soc. Toxicol.&lt;br /&gt;16:113-124.&lt;br /&gt;Bathe, R., L. Ullman, K. Sachsse and R. Hess. 1975b. Relationship between&lt;br /&gt;toxicity to fish and to mammals: A comparative study under defined laboratory&lt;br /&gt;conditions. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Office of Pesticide&lt;br /&gt;Programs registration standard.&lt;br /&gt;Bauer, N.J., R.J. Seidler and M.D. Knittel. 1981. A simple, rapid bioassay for&lt;br /&gt;detecting effects of pollutants on bacteria. Bull. Environm. Contam. Toxicol.&lt;br /&gt;27:577-582.&lt;br /&gt;Bay, S., R. Burgess and D. Nacci. 1993. Status and applications of echinoid&lt;br /&gt;(phylum enchinodermata) toxicity test methods. In: Environmental toxicology&lt;br /&gt;and risk assessment. Landis W.G., J.S. Hughes and M.A. Lewis (Eds). ASTM STP&lt;br /&gt;1179. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. pp. 281-&lt;br /&gt;302.&lt;br /&gt;Beauvais, S.L., S.B. Jones, S.K. Brewerand and E.E. Little. 2000.&lt;br /&gt;Physiological measures of neurotoxicity of diazinon and malathion to larval&lt;br /&gt;trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and their correlation with behavioral measures.&lt;br /&gt;Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19:1875-1880.&lt;br /&gt;Beliles, R. 1965. Diazinon safety evaluation on fish and wildlife: Bobwhite&lt;br /&gt;quail, goldfish, sunfish and rainbow trout. U.S. Environmental Protection&lt;br /&gt;Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs registration standard.&lt;br /&gt;Berry, W.J. 1989. Science Applications International Corporation,&lt;br /&gt;Narragansett, RI. Recalculation of Del Nimmo's flow-through chronic values for&lt;br /&gt;mysids with diazinon. (Memorandum to D.J. Hansen, U.S. EPA, Narragansett, RI&lt;br /&gt;55&lt;br /&gt;April 27).&lt;br /&gt;Bishop, C.A., N.A. Mahony, J. Struger, P. Ng and K.E. Pettit. 1999. Anuran&lt;br /&gt;development, density and diversity in relation to agricultural activity in the&lt;br /&gt;Holland River watershed, Ontario, Canada (1990-1992). Environ. Monitor.&lt;br /&gt;Assess. 57:21-43.&lt;br /&gt;Boumaiza, M., M.H. Ktari and P. Vitiello. 1979. Toxicite de divers pesticides&lt;br /&gt;utilises en tunisie pour Aphanius fasciatus Nardo, 1827 (Pisces,&lt;br /&gt;Cyprinodontidae). Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis 56:307-342.&lt;br /&gt;Bresch, H. 1991. Early life-stage test in zebrafish versus a growth test in&lt;br /&gt;rainbow trout to evaluate toxic effects. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.&lt;br /&gt;46:641-648.&lt;br /&gt;Burbank, S.E. and T. W. Snell. 1994. Rapid toxicity assessment using esterase&lt;br /&gt;biomarkers in Brachionus calyciflorus (Rotifera). Environ. Toxicol. Water&lt;br /&gt;Quality 9:171-178.&lt;br /&gt;Burchfield, H.P. and E.E. Storrs. 1954. Kinetics of insecticidal action based&lt;br /&gt;on the photomigration of larvae of Aedes aegypti (L.). Contri. Boyce Thompson&lt;br /&gt;Inst. 17:439-452.&lt;br /&gt;Burkhard, L.P. and J.J. Jenson. 1993. Identification of ammonia, chlorine, and&lt;br /&gt;diazinon as toxicants in a municipal effluent. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.&lt;br /&gt;25:506-515.&lt;br /&gt;Butler, P.A. 1963. Commercial fisheries investigations. In: A review of fish&lt;br /&gt;and wildlife service investigations during 1961 and 1962. Circular 167. Fish&lt;br /&gt;and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 25 pp.&lt;br /&gt;Butler, G.L., T.R. Deason and J.C. O'Kelley. 1975a. The effect of atrazine,&lt;br /&gt;2,4-D, methoxychlor, carbaryl and diazinon on the growth of planktonic algae.&lt;br /&gt;Br. Phycol. J. 10:371-376.&lt;br /&gt;Butler, G.L., T.R. Deason and J.C. O'Kelley. 1975b. Loss of five pesticides&lt;br /&gt;from cultures of twenty-one planktonic algae. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.&lt;br /&gt;13:149-152.&lt;br /&gt;Call, D.J. 1993. Validation study of a protocol for testing the acute toxicity&lt;br /&gt;of pesticides to invertebrates using the apple snail (Pomacea paludosa). No.&lt;br /&gt;CR 819612-01. Final Report to U.S. EPA Cooperative Agreement.&lt;br /&gt;Ceron, J.J, E. Sancho, M.D. Ferrando, C. Gutierrez, and E. Andreu. 1996a.&lt;br /&gt;Metabolic effects of diazinon on the European eel Anguilla anguilla. J.&lt;br /&gt;Environ. Sci. Health B31:1029-1040.&lt;br /&gt;Ceron, J.J., M.D. Ferrando, E. Sancho, C. Gutierrez-Panizo and E. Andreu-&lt;br /&gt;Moliner. 1996b. Effects of diazinon exposure on cholinesterase activity in&lt;br /&gt;different tissues of European eel (Anguilla anguilla). Ecotoxicol. Environ.&lt;br /&gt;56&lt;br /&gt;Safety. 35:222-225.&lt;br /&gt;Chatterjee, K. 1975. Toxicity of diazinon to fish and fish food organisms.&lt;br /&gt;Indian Sci. Cong. Assoc. Proc. 62:166-167.&lt;br /&gt;Chatterjee, K. and S.K Konar. 1984. Effects of the pesticide diazinon at&lt;br /&gt;various pH and turbidity on fish and aquatic ecosystem. Environ. Ecol. 2:49-&lt;br /&gt;53.&lt;br /&gt;Chen, P.S., Y.N. Lin and C.L. Chung. 1971. Laboratory studies on the&lt;br /&gt;susceptibility of mosquito-eating fish, Lebistes reticulatus and the larvae of&lt;br /&gt;Culex pipiens fatigans to insecticides. Tai-Wan I Hsueh Hui Tsa Chih, 70:28-&lt;br /&gt;35.&lt;br /&gt;Christensen, G.M. and J.H. Tucker. 1976. Effects of selected water toxicants&lt;br /&gt;on the in vitro activity of fish carbonic anhydrase. Chem.-Biol. Interact.&lt;br /&gt;13:181-191.&lt;br /&gt;Chu, K.H. and P.Y. Lau. 1994. Effects of diazinon, malathion, and paraquat on&lt;br /&gt;the behavioral response of the shrimp Metapenaeus ensis to chemoattractants.&lt;br /&gt;Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 53:127-133.&lt;br /&gt;Ciba-Geigy Corporation. 1976. Reports of investigations made with respect to&lt;br /&gt;fish and wildlife requirements for diazinon and its formualted products. U.S.&lt;br /&gt;Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs registration&lt;br /&gt;standard.&lt;br /&gt;Clark, J.R., D. DeVault, R.J. Bowden and J.A. Weishaar. 1984. Contaminant&lt;br /&gt;analysis of fillets from Great Lakes coho salmon, 1980. J. Great Lakes Res.&lt;br /&gt;10:38-47.&lt;br /&gt;Clegg, T.J. and J.L. Koevenig. 1974. The effect of four chlorinated&lt;br /&gt;hydrocarbon pesticides and one organophosphate pesticide on ATP levels in&lt;br /&gt;three species of photosynthesizing freshwater algae. Bot. Gaz. 135:368-372.&lt;br /&gt;Collyard, S.A., G.T. Ankley, R.A. Hoke and T. Goldenstein. 1994. Influence of&lt;br /&gt;age on the relative sensitivity of Hyalella azteca to diazinon, alkylphenol&lt;br /&gt;ethoxylates, copper, cadmium and zinc. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 26:110-&lt;br /&gt;113.&lt;br /&gt;Connolly, J.P. 1985. Predicting single-species toxicity in natural water&lt;br /&gt;systems. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 4:573-582.&lt;br /&gt;Cope, O.B. 1965a. Contamination of the freshwater ecosystem by pesticides. J.&lt;br /&gt;Appl. Ecol. 3(Supplement):33-44.&lt;br /&gt;Cope, O.B. 1965b. Sport fishery investigations. Circular No. 226:51-63. U.S.&lt;br /&gt;Fish and Wildlife Service.&lt;br /&gt;Cripe, G.M. 1994. Comparative acute toxicities of several pesticides and&lt;br /&gt;57&lt;br /&gt;metals to Mysidopsis bahia and postlarval Penaeus duorarum. Environ. Toxicol.&lt;br /&gt;Chem. 13:1867-1872.&lt;br /&gt;Curtis, C., A. Lima, S.J. Lozano and G.D. Veith. 1982. Evaluation of a&lt;br /&gt;bacterial bioluminescence bioassay as a method for predicting acute toxicity&lt;br /&gt;of organic chemicals to fish. In: Aquatic toxicology and hazard assessment:&lt;br /&gt;Fifth conference. Pearson, J.G., R.B. Foster and W.E. Bishop (Eds.). ASTM STP&lt;br /&gt;766, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. pp. 170-&lt;br /&gt;178.&lt;br /&gt;Deanovic, L., H. Bailey, T. Shed, D. Hinton, E. Reyes, K. Larsen, K.&lt;br /&gt;Cortright, T. Kimball, L. Lampara and H. Nielsen. 1996. Sacramento-San Joaquin&lt;br /&gt;Delta bioassay monitoring report: 1993-1994. Staff report, Central Valley&lt;br /&gt;Regional Water Quality Control Board, Sacramento, CA.&lt;br /&gt;Deanovic, L., K. Cortright, K. Larsen, E. Reyes, H. Bailey and D. Hinton.&lt;br /&gt;1997. Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta bioassay monitoring report: 1994-95. Staff&lt;br /&gt;report, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Sacramento, CA.&lt;br /&gt;Deneer, J.W., B.J. Budde and A. Weijers. 1999. Variations in the lethal body&lt;br /&gt;burdens of organophosphorus compounds in the guppy. Chemosphere. 38:1671-1683.&lt;br /&gt;Dennis, W.H., E.P. Meier, W.F. Randall, A.B. Rosencrance and D.H. Rosenblatt.&lt;br /&gt;1979a. Degradation of diazinon by sodium hypochlorite. Chemistry and aquatic&lt;br /&gt;toxicity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13:594-598.&lt;br /&gt;Dennis, W.H., E.P. Meier, A.B. Rosencrance, W.F. Randall, M.T. Reagan and D.H.&lt;br /&gt;Rosenblatt. 1979b. Chemical degradation of military standard formulations of&lt;br /&gt;organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides. II. Degradation of diazinon by&lt;br /&gt;sodium hypochlorite. Tech. Rep. No. 7904 U.S. Army Medical Engineering&lt;br /&gt;Research and Development Laboratory, Fort Detrick, MD or PBAD-A081 098/6&lt;br /&gt;National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA. 44 p.&lt;br /&gt;Dennis, W.H., A.B. Rosencrance, W.F. Randall and E.P. Meier. 1980. Acid&lt;br /&gt;hydrolysis of military standard formulations of diazinon. J. Environ. Sci.&lt;br /&gt;Health B15:47-60.&lt;br /&gt;Devillers, J., T. Mennier and P. Chambon. 1985. Interet de la relation doseeffet-&lt;br /&gt;temps en ecotoxicologie pour la determination des differentes classes&lt;br /&gt;chimiques de toxiques. Tech. Sci. Munic. 80:329-334.&lt;br /&gt;De Vlaming, V., V. Connor, C. DeGiorgio, H. Bailey, L. Deanovic and D. Hinton.&lt;br /&gt;2000. Application of whole effluent toxicity test procedures to ambient water&lt;br /&gt;quality assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19:42-62.&lt;br /&gt;Doggett, S.M. and R.G. Rhodes. 1991. Effects of a diazinon formulation on&lt;br /&gt;unialgal growth rates and phytoplankton diversity. Bull. Environ. Contam.&lt;br /&gt;Toxicol. 47:36-42.&lt;br /&gt;58&lt;br /&gt;Domagalski, J.L., N.M. Dubrovsky and C.R. Kratzer. 1997. Pesticides in the San&lt;br /&gt;Joaquin River, California: Inputs from dormant sprayed orchards. J. Environ.&lt;br /&gt;Qual. 26: 454-465.&lt;br /&gt;Dortland, R.J. 1980. Toxicological evaluation of parathion and azinphosmethyl&lt;br /&gt;in freshwater model ecosystems. Agric. Res. Rep. (Versl. landbouwk. Onderz.)&lt;br /&gt;898:1-112.&lt;br /&gt;Dutt, N. and R.S. Guha. 1988. Toxicity of few organophosphorus insecticides to&lt;br /&gt;fingerlings of bound water fishes, Cyprinus carpio (Linn.) and Tilapia&lt;br /&gt;mossambica Peters. Indian J. Entomol. 50:403-421.&lt;br /&gt;Dutta, H.M., J. Marcelino and C.R. Richmonds. 1992a. Brain&lt;br /&gt;acetylcholinesterase activity and optomotor behavior in bluegills, Lepomis&lt;br /&gt;macrochirus exposed to different concentrations of diazinon. Arch. Int.&lt;br /&gt;Physiol. Biochim. Biophys. 100:331-334.&lt;br /&gt;Dutta, H.M., T. Zeno, and C.R. Richmonds. 1992b. Toxic action of diazinon on&lt;br /&gt;the gills of bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus. Ohio J. Sci. 92:9-12.&lt;br /&gt;Dutta, H.M., C.R. Richmonds and T. Zeno. 1993. Effects of diazinon on the&lt;br /&gt;gills of bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol.&lt;br /&gt;Oncol. 12:219-227.&lt;br /&gt;Dutta, H.M., J.S.D. Munshi, P.K. Ray, N.K. Singh and L. Motz. 1994. Normal and&lt;br /&gt;diazinon exposed gill structure changes in bluegills, Lepomis macrochirus: A&lt;br /&gt;scanning electon microscopic study. J. Morphol. 220:343-344.&lt;br /&gt;Dutta, H.M., N. Qadri, J. Ojha, N.K. Singhi, S. Adhikari, J.S.D. Munshi and&lt;br /&gt;P.K. Roy. 1997. Effect of diazinon on macrophages of bluegill sunfish, Lepomis&lt;br /&gt;macrochirus: A cytochemical evaluation. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.&lt;br /&gt;58:135-141.&lt;br /&gt;Duursma, E.K. and A. Hanafi. 1975. Use of pesticides in brackish water ponds.&lt;br /&gt;I. effects of diazinon on fish and shrimp. Bull. Shrimp Cult. Res. Cent. 1:56-&lt;br /&gt;68.&lt;br /&gt;Dyer, S.D., K.L. Dickson and E.G. Zimmerman. 1993. A laboratory evaluation of&lt;br /&gt;the use of stress proteins in fish to detect changes in water quality. In:&lt;br /&gt;Environmental toxicology and risk assessment. Landis, W.G., J.S. Hughes and&lt;br /&gt;M.A. Lewis (Eds.). ASTM STP 1179. American Society for Testing and Materials,&lt;br /&gt;Philadelphia, PA. pp. 247-261.&lt;br /&gt;Dyer, S.D., S.E. Belanger and G.J. Carr. 1997. An initial evaluation of the&lt;br /&gt;use of Euro/North American fish species for tropical effects assessments.&lt;br /&gt;Chemosphere. 35(11): 2767-2781.&lt;br /&gt;Eisler, R. 1986. Diazinon hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: A&lt;br /&gt;synoptic review. Rep. 85(1-9). U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Biol. 37 pp.&lt;br /&gt;El-Elaimy, I.A., M.M. El-Saadawy, S.A. Gabr, and S.A. Sakr. 1990. Pesticide59&lt;br /&gt;poisoning to fresh water teleost VIII. Ultrastructural alterations of the&lt;br /&gt;intestine of Tilapia nilotica under stress of exposure to diazinon and&lt;br /&gt;neopybuthrin. J. Egypt. Ger. Soc. Zool. 1:223-236.&lt;br /&gt;Evtugyn, G.A., E.P. Rizaeva, E.E. Stoikova, V.Z. Latipova and H.C. Budnikov.&lt;br /&gt;1997. The application of cholinesterase potentiometric biosensor for&lt;br /&gt;preliminary screening of the toxicity of waste waters. Electroanalysis.&lt;br /&gt;9:1124-1128.&lt;br /&gt;Farm Chemicals Handbook. 2000. Meister Publishing Company, Willoughby, OH.&lt;br /&gt;Faust, S.D. and H.M. Gomaa. 1972. Chemical hydrolysis of some organic&lt;br /&gt;phosphorus and carbamate pesticides in aquatic environments. Environ. Lett.&lt;br /&gt;3:171-201.&lt;br /&gt;Federle, P.F. and W.J. Collins. 1976. Insecticide toxicity to three insects&lt;br /&gt;from Ohio ponds. Ohio J. Sci. 76:19-24.&lt;br /&gt;Fernandez-Casalderrey, A., M.D. Ferrando and E. Andreu-Moliner. 1992a. Acute&lt;br /&gt;toxicity of several pesticides to rotifer (Brachionus calyciflorus). Bull.&lt;br /&gt;Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 48:14-17.&lt;br /&gt;Fernandez-Casalderry, A., M.D. Ferrando and E. Andreu-Moliner. 1992b.&lt;br /&gt;Filtration and injestion rates of Brachionus calyciflorus after exposure to&lt;br /&gt;endosulfan and diazinon. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 103:357-361.&lt;br /&gt;Fernandez-Casalderrey, A., M.D. Ferrando and E. Andreu-Moliner. 1992c. Effect&lt;br /&gt;of sublethal diazinon concentrations on the demographic parameters of&lt;br /&gt;Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas (Rotifera). Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.&lt;br /&gt;48:202-208.&lt;br /&gt;Fernandez-Casalderrey, A., M.D. Ferrando and E. Andreu-Moliner. 1992d.&lt;br /&gt;Endosulfan and diazinon toxicity to the freshwater rotifer Brachionus&lt;br /&gt;calyciflorus. J. Environ. Sci. Health 27B:155-164.&lt;br /&gt;Fernandez-Casalderrey, A., M.D. Ferrrando and E. Andreu-Moliner. 1994. Effect&lt;br /&gt;of sublethal concentrations of pesticides on the feeding behavior of Daphnia&lt;br /&gt;magna. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 27:82-89.&lt;br /&gt;Fernandez-Casalderrey, A., M.D. Ferrando and E. Andrue-Moliner. 1995. Chronic&lt;br /&gt;toxicity of diazinon to Daphnia magna: Effects on survival, reproduction and&lt;br /&gt;growth. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 49:25-32.&lt;br /&gt;Ferrando, M.D., E. Sancho and E. Andreu-Moliner. 1991. Comparative acute&lt;br /&gt;toxicities of selected pesticides to Anguilla anguilla. J. Environ. Sci.&lt;br /&gt;Health 26B:491-498.&lt;br /&gt;Foe, C. 1995. Insecticide concentrations and invertebrate bioassay mortality&lt;br /&gt;in agricultural return water from the San Joaquin Basin. Staff report, Central&lt;br /&gt;Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Sacramento, CA.&lt;br /&gt;Foe, C., L. Deanovic and D. Hinton. 1998. Toxicity identification evaluations&lt;br /&gt;60&lt;br /&gt;of orchard dormant spray storm runoff. Staff report, Central Valley Regional&lt;br /&gt;Water Quality Control Board, Sacramento, CA.&lt;br /&gt;Forrest, M., K.A. Lord and N. Walker. 1981. The influence of soil treatments&lt;br /&gt;on the bacterial degradation of diazinon and other organophosphorus&lt;br /&gt;insecticides. Environ. Pollut. (Series A) 24:93-104.&lt;br /&gt;Fort, D.J., E.L. Stover, S.L. Burks, R.A. Atherton and J.T. Blankemeyer. 1996.&lt;br /&gt;Utilizing biomarker techniques: cellular membrane potential as a biomarker of&lt;br /&gt;subchronic toxicity. In: Environmental toxicology and risk assessment:&lt;br /&gt;Biomarkers and risk assessment-Fifth Vol., ASTM STP 1306, Bengtson, D.A. and&lt;br /&gt;D.S. Henshel (Eds.). American Society for Testing and Materials. pp. 177-187.&lt;br /&gt;Fredeen, F.J.H. 1972. Reactions of the larvae of three rheophilic species of&lt;br /&gt;tricoptera to selected insecticides. Can. Entomol. 104:945-953.&lt;br /&gt;Fujii, Y. and S. Asaka. 1982. Metabolism of diazinon and diazoxon in fish&lt;br /&gt;liver preparations. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 29:455-460.&lt;br /&gt;Garrood, C., A.C. Akroyd, M. Beverley, M. Boryslawskyj, J.T. Pearson and D.&lt;br /&gt;Woodhead. 1990. Evaluation of glutathione transferase in molluscs in response&lt;br /&gt;to xenobiotics. Mar. Environ. Res. 28:147.&lt;br /&gt;Garten, C.T., Jr. and J.R. Trabalka. 1983. Evaluation of models for predicting&lt;br /&gt;terrestrial food chain behavior of xenobiotics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17:590-&lt;br /&gt;595.&lt;br /&gt;Giddings, J.M., R.C. Biever, M.F. Annunziato and A.J. Hosmer. 1996. Effects of&lt;br /&gt;diazinon on large outdoor pond microcosms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15:618-629.&lt;br /&gt;Glass, P.W., B.L. Jordan, J.L Mancini and J. Mathews. 1995. WET testing faces&lt;br /&gt;diazinon dilemma. Water Environ. Tech. 7:29-30.&lt;br /&gt;Gomaa, H.M., I.H. Suffet and S.D. Faust. 1969. Kinetics of hydrolysis of&lt;br /&gt;diazinon and diazonon. Residue Rev. 29:171-190.&lt;br /&gt;Goodman, L.R., D.J. Hansen, D.L. Coppage, J.C. Moore, and E. Matthews. 1979.&lt;br /&gt;Diazinon: Chronic toxicity to, and brain acetylcholinesterase inhibition in,&lt;br /&gt;the sheepshead minnow, Cyprinodon variegatus. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 108:479-&lt;br /&gt;488.&lt;br /&gt;Gruber, S.J. and M.D. Munn. 1998. Organophosphate and carbamate insecticides&lt;br /&gt;in agricultural waters and cholinesterase (ChE) inhibition in common carp&lt;br /&gt;(Cyprinus carpio). Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 35: 391-396.&lt;br /&gt;Guinn, R., J. Coulter and K. Dickson. 1995. Use of a constructed wetland to&lt;br /&gt;reduce diazinon toxicity in a municipal wastewater effluent. Proceedings of&lt;br /&gt;the 24th Water for Texas Conference. Texas Water Resources Institute.&lt;br /&gt;Guzzella, L., A. Gronda and L. Colombo. 1997. Acute toxicity of&lt;br /&gt;organophosphorus insecticides to marine invertebrates. Bull. Environ. Contam.&lt;br /&gt;Toxicol. 59:313-320.&lt;br /&gt;61&lt;br /&gt;Hamm, J.T., B.W. Wilson and D.E. Hinton. 1998. Organophosphate-induced&lt;br /&gt;acetylcholinesterase inhibition and embryonic retinal cell necrosis in vivo in&lt;br /&gt;the teleost (Oryzias latipes). Nuero Toxicol. 19:853-870&lt;br /&gt;Harris, M.L., C.A. Bishop, J. Struger, B. Ripley and J.P. Bogart. 1998. The&lt;br /&gt;functional integrity of northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens) and green frog&lt;br /&gt;(Rana clamitans) populations in orchard wetlands. II. Effects of pesticides&lt;br /&gt;and eutrophic conditions on early life stage development. Environ. Toxicol.&lt;br /&gt;Chem. 17:1351-1363.&lt;br /&gt;Hashimoto, Y. and J. Fukami. 1969. Toxicity of orally and topically applied&lt;br /&gt;pesticide ingredients to carp, Cyprinus carpio Linne. Sci. Pest Control 34:63-&lt;br /&gt;66.&lt;br /&gt;Hashimoto, Y. and Y. Nishiuchi. 1981. Establishment of bioassay methods for&lt;br /&gt;the evaluation of acute toxicity of pesticides to aquatic organisms. J.&lt;br /&gt;Pestic. Sci. 6:257-264.&lt;br /&gt;Hashimoto, Y., E. Okubo, T. Ito, M. Yamaguchi and S. Tonaka. 1982. Changes in&lt;br /&gt;susceptibility of carp to several pesticides with growth. J. Pestic. Sci.&lt;br /&gt;7:457-461.&lt;br /&gt;Hatakeyama, S. and Y. Sugaya. 1989. A freshwater shrimp (Paratya compressa&lt;br /&gt;improvisa) as a sensitive test organism to pesticides. Environ. Pollut.&lt;br /&gt;59:325-336.&lt;br /&gt;Hatakeyama, S., H. Shiraishi and S. Uno. 1997. Overall pesticide effects on&lt;br /&gt;growth and emergence of two species of Ephemeroptera in a model stream&lt;br /&gt;carrying pesticide-polluted river water. Ecotoxicol. 6:167-180.&lt;br /&gt;Hendriks, A.J., H. Pieters and J. De Boer. 1998. Accumulation of metals,&lt;br /&gt;polycyclic (Halogenated) aromatic hydrocarbons, and biocides in zebra mussel&lt;br /&gt;and eel from the Rhine and Meuse rivers. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17:1885-1898.&lt;br /&gt;Hidaka, H., M. Hattanda and R. Tatsukawa. 1984. Avoidance of pesticides with&lt;br /&gt;medakas (Oryzias latipes). J. Agric. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 58:145-151.&lt;br /&gt;Hilsenhoff, W.L. 1959. The evaluation of insecticides for the control of&lt;br /&gt;Tendipes plumosus (Linnaeus). J. Econ. Entomol. 52:331-332.&lt;br /&gt;Hiltibran, R.C. 1974. Oxygen and phosphate metabolism of bluegill liver&lt;br /&gt;mitochondria in the presence of some insecticides. Trans. Ill. State Acad.&lt;br /&gt;Sci. 67:228-237.&lt;br /&gt;Hiltibran, R.C. 1982. Effects of insecticides on the metal-activated&lt;br /&gt;hydrolysis of adenosine triphosphate by bluegill liver mitochondria. Arch.&lt;br /&gt;Envrion. Contam. Toxicol. 11:709-717.&lt;br /&gt;Hirakoso, S. 1968. Inactivation of some insecticides by bacteria in mosquito&lt;br /&gt;breeding polluted water. Jap. J. Exp. Med. 38:327-334.&lt;br /&gt;Hirayama, K. and S. Tamanoi. 1980. Acute toxicity of MEP and diazinon&lt;br /&gt;62&lt;br /&gt;(pesticides) to larvae of Kuruma prawn, Penaeus japonicus and of swimming&lt;br /&gt;crab, Portunus trituberculatus. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 46:117-123. (in&lt;br /&gt;Japanese with English summary).&lt;br /&gt;Hirose, K. and M. Kitsukama. 1976. Acute toxicity of agricultural chemicals to&lt;br /&gt;seawater teleosts, with special respect to TLM and the vertebral abnormality.&lt;br /&gt;Bull. Tokai Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 84:11-20. (in Janpanese with English&lt;br /&gt;summary).&lt;br /&gt;Hirose, K. and K. Kawakami. 1977. Effects of insecticides, oil dispersants and&lt;br /&gt;synthetic detergent on the embryonic development in medaka, Oryzias latipes.&lt;br /&gt;Bull. Tokai Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 91:9-17.&lt;br /&gt;Hirose, K., M. Yamazaki, and A. Ishikawa. 1979. Effects of water temperature&lt;br /&gt;on median lethal concentrations (LC50) of a few pesticides to seawater&lt;br /&gt;teleosts. Bull. Tokai Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 98:45-53. (in Japanese with English&lt;br /&gt;summary).&lt;br /&gt;Hogan, J.W. and C.O. Knowles. 1972. Metabolism of diazinon by fish liver&lt;br /&gt;microsomes. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 8:61-64.&lt;br /&gt;Hughes, J. 1988. The toxicity of diazinon technical to Selenastrum&lt;br /&gt;capricornutum. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide&lt;br /&gt;Programs registration standard.&lt;br /&gt;Hunter, R., L. Faulkner, F. Culver and J. Hill. 1985. Draft user manual for&lt;br /&gt;the QSAR system. Center for Data Analysis, Montana State University. Bozeman,&lt;br /&gt;MT.&lt;br /&gt;Iglesias-Jimenez, E., E. Poveda, M.J. Sanchez-Martin and M. Sanchez-Camazano.&lt;br /&gt;1997. Effect of the nature of exogenous organic matter on pesticide sorption&lt;br /&gt;by the soil. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 33:117-124.&lt;br /&gt;Iqbal, J., S.A. Mufti and Asmatullah. 1992. Effect of chronic exposure of&lt;br /&gt;diazinon on the reproduction of freshwater fish Colisa fasciata. Sci. Int.&lt;br /&gt;(Lahore) 4:403-408.&lt;br /&gt;Jamnback, H. and J. Frempong-Boadu. 1966. Testing blackfly larvicides in the&lt;br /&gt;laboratory and in streams. Bull. W.H.O. 34:405-421.&lt;br /&gt;Jarvinen, A.W. and D.K. Tanner. 1982. Toxicity of selected controlled release&lt;br /&gt;and corresponding unformulated technical grade pesticides to the fathead&lt;br /&gt;minnow Pimephales promelas. Environ. Pollut. (Series A) 27:179-195.&lt;br /&gt;Johnson, W.W. and M.T. Finley. 1980. Handbook of acute toxicity of chemicals&lt;br /&gt;to fish and aquatic invertebrates. Resource Publication 137. U.S. Fish and&lt;br /&gt;Wildlife Serv., Washington, DC.&lt;br /&gt;Juchelka, C.M. and T.W. Snell. 1994. Rapid toxicity assessment using rotifer&lt;br /&gt;ingestion rate. Arch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 26:549-554.&lt;br /&gt;63&lt;br /&gt;Kabir, S.M.H. and N. Ahmed. 1979. Histopathological changes in climbing perch,&lt;br /&gt;Anabas testudineus (Bloch) (Anabantidae: Perciformes) due to three granular&lt;br /&gt;insecticides. Bangladesh J. Zool. 7:21-29.&lt;br /&gt;Kabir, S.M.H. and R. Begum. 1978. Toxicity of three organophosphorus&lt;br /&gt;insecticides to shinghi fish, Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch). Dacca Univ.&lt;br /&gt;Stud. 26:115-122.&lt;br /&gt;Kaiser, K.L.E., S.P. Niculescu and G. Schuurmann. 1997. Feed forward&lt;br /&gt;backpropagation neural networks and their use in predicting the acute toxicity&lt;br /&gt;of chemicals to the fathead minnow. Water Qual Res. J. Can. 32:637-657.&lt;br /&gt;Kanazawa, J. 1975. Uptake and excretion of organophosphorus and carbamate&lt;br /&gt;insecticides by fresh water fish, Motsugo, Pseudorasbora parva. Bull. Environ.&lt;br /&gt;Contam. Toxicol. 14:346-352.&lt;br /&gt;Kanazawa, J. 1978. Bioconcentration ratio of diazinon by freshwater fish and&lt;br /&gt;snail. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 20:613-617.&lt;br /&gt;Kanazawa, J. 1980. Prediction of biological concentration potential of&lt;br /&gt;pesticides in aquatic organisms. Rev. Plant Protect. Res. 13:27-36.&lt;br /&gt;Kanazawa, J. 1981a. Bioconcentration potential of pesticides by aquatic&lt;br /&gt;organisms. Jpn. Pestic. Inf. 39:12-16.&lt;br /&gt;Kanazawa, J. 1981b. Measurement of the bioconcentration factors of pesticides&lt;br /&gt;by freshwater fish and their correlation with physicochemical properties or&lt;br /&gt;acute toxicities. Pest. Sci. 12:417-424.&lt;br /&gt;Kanazawa, J. 1982. Relationship between the molecular weights of pesticides&lt;br /&gt;and their bioconcentration factors by fish. Experientia 38:1045-1046.&lt;br /&gt;Kanazawa, J. 1983a. In vitro and in vivo effects of organophosphorus and&lt;br /&gt;carbamate insecticides on brain acetylcholinesterase activity of fresh-water&lt;br /&gt;fish, topmouth gudgeon. Bull. Nat. Inst. Agric. Sci. 37C:19-30.&lt;br /&gt;Kanazawa, J. 1983b. A method of predicting the bioconcentration potential of&lt;br /&gt;pesticides by using fish. Jarq 17:173-179.&lt;br /&gt;Kaur, K. and H.S. Toor. 1980. Role of abiotic factors in the embryonic&lt;br /&gt;development of scale carp. Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad. B46:136-148.&lt;br /&gt;Kawai, S., M. Fukushima, T. Tsuchinaga, and K. Oda. 1984. Metals and synthetic&lt;br /&gt;organic compounds in plankton from the estuary and harbor in Osaka City. Bull.&lt;br /&gt;Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 50:1777-1783.&lt;br /&gt;Keizer, J., G. D'Agostino and L. Vittozzi. 1991. The importance of&lt;br /&gt;biotransformation in the toxicity of xenobiotics to fish. I. Toxicity and&lt;br /&gt;bioaccumulation of diazinon in guppy (Poecilia reticulata) and zebra fish&lt;br /&gt;(Brachydanio rerio). Aquat. Toxicol. 21:239-254.&lt;br /&gt;64&lt;br /&gt;Keizer, J., G. D'Agostino, R. Nagel, F. Gramenzi and L. Vittozzi. 1993.&lt;br /&gt;Comparative diazinon toxicity in guppy and zebra fish: Different role of&lt;br /&gt;oxidative metabolism. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12:1243-1250.&lt;br /&gt;Keizer, J., G. D'Agostino, R. Nagel, T. Volpe, P. Gnemi and L. Vittozzi. 1995.&lt;br /&gt;Enzymological differences of AChE and diazinon hepatic metabolism: Correlation&lt;br /&gt;of in vito data with the selective toxicity of diazinon to fish species. Sci.&lt;br /&gt;Total Environ. 171:213-220.&lt;br /&gt;Kenaga, E.E. 1979. Aquatic test organisms and methods useful for assessment of&lt;br /&gt;chronic toxicity of chemicals. In: Analyzing the hazard evaluation process.&lt;br /&gt;Dickson, K.L., A.W. Maki and J. Cairns, Jr. (Eds.). American Fisheries&lt;br /&gt;Society, pp. 101-111.&lt;br /&gt;Kenaga, E.E. 1982. Predictability of chronic toxicity from acute toxicity of&lt;br /&gt;chemicals in fish and aquatic invertebrates. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1:347-&lt;br /&gt;358.&lt;br /&gt;Khalaf-Allah, S.S. 1999. Effect of pesticide water pollution on some haematological,&lt;br /&gt;biochemical and immunological parameters in Tilapia nilotica fish.&lt;br /&gt;Dtsch. tierarztl. Wschr. 106:53-84.&lt;br /&gt;Khattat, F.H. and S. Farley. 1976. Acute toxicity of certain pesticides to&lt;br /&gt;Acartia tonsa. EPA-600/3-76-033. Dana Ecol. Res. Ser.,&lt;br /&gt;Kikuchi, M., T. Miyagaki and M. Wakabayashi. 1996. Evaluation of pesticides&lt;br /&gt;used in golf links by acute toxicity test on rainbow trout. Bull. Jpn. Soc.&lt;br /&gt;Sci. Fish. 62:414-419.&lt;br /&gt;Kikuchi, T., M. Kamei, S. Okubo and M. Yasund. 1992. Effects of the insect&lt;br /&gt;growth regulator methoprene and organophosphorus insecticides against nontarget&lt;br /&gt;aquatic organisms in urban drains. Jpn. J. Sanit. Zool. 43:65-70.&lt;br /&gt;Kimura, T. and H.L. Keegan. 1966. Toxicity of some insecticides and&lt;br /&gt;molluscicides for the asian blood sucking leech, Hirudo nipponia Whitman. Am.&lt;br /&gt;J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 15:113-115.&lt;br /&gt;Klassen, W., W.J. Keppler and J.B. Kitzmiller. 1965. Toxicities of certain&lt;br /&gt;larvicides to resistant and susceptible Aedes aegypti (L). Bull. W.H.O.&lt;br /&gt;33:117-122.&lt;br /&gt;Kobayashi, K., Y. Wang, S. Kimura, R.M. Rompas, N. Imada and Y. Oshima. 1993.&lt;br /&gt;Practical application of piperonyl butoxide for the reduction of&lt;br /&gt;organophosphorus insecticide-toxicity to kuruma prawn. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci.&lt;br /&gt;Fish. 59:2053-2057.&lt;br /&gt;Kok, L.T. 1972. Toxicity of insecticides used for asiatic rice borer control&lt;br /&gt;to tropical fish in rice paddies. In: The careless technology: Conference on&lt;br /&gt;the ecological aspects of international development, papers. Natural History&lt;br /&gt;65&lt;br /&gt;Press, Garden City, N.Y. pp. 489-498.&lt;br /&gt;Kratzer, C.R. 1999. Transport of diazinon in the San Joaquin River Basin,&lt;br /&gt;California. J. Am. Wat. Res. Assoc. 35:379-395.&lt;br /&gt;Kraus, M.P. 1985. Cyanophage assay as a new concept in the study of&lt;br /&gt;environmental toxicity. In: Aquatic toxicology and hazard assessment: Seventh&lt;br /&gt;symposium. Cardwell, R.D., R. Purdy and R.C. Bahner (Eds.). ASTM STP 854.&lt;br /&gt;American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. pp. 27-41.&lt;br /&gt;Ku, Y., J. Chang, Y. Shen and S. Lin. 1998a. Decomposition of diazinon in&lt;br /&gt;aqueous solution by ozonation. Wat. Res. 32:1957-1963.&lt;br /&gt;Ku, Y., J. Chang and S. Cheng. 1998b. Effect of solution pH on the hydrolysis&lt;br /&gt;and photolysis of diazinon in aqueous solution. Water, Air, and Soil&lt;br /&gt;Pollution. 108:445-456.&lt;br /&gt;Kuivila, K.M. and C.G. Foe. 1995. Concentrations, transport and biological&lt;br /&gt;effects of dormant spray pesticides in the San Francisco Estuary, California.&lt;br /&gt;Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 14:1141-1150.&lt;br /&gt;Kuwabara, K., A. Nakamura and T. Kashimoto. 1980. Effect of petroleum oil,&lt;br /&gt;pesticides, PCB's and other environmental contaminants on the hatchability of&lt;br /&gt;Artemia salina dry eggs. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 25:69-74.&lt;br /&gt;LaBrecque, G.C., J.R. Noe and J.B. Gahan. 1956. Effectiveness of insecticides&lt;br /&gt;on granular clay carriers against mosquito larvae. Mosq. News 16:1-3.&lt;br /&gt;Land, L.F. and M.F. Brown. 1996. Water Quality assessment of the Trinity River&lt;br /&gt;Basin, Texas - Pesticides in streams draining an urban and an agricultural&lt;br /&gt;area, 1993-95. USGS Report 96-4114, Austin, TX 22 pp.&lt;br /&gt;Larsen, K., V. Connor, L. Deanovic and D. Hinto. 1998. Sacramento River&lt;br /&gt;watershed program toxicity monitoring results: 1997-1998. University of&lt;br /&gt;California, Davis. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board,&lt;br /&gt;Sacramento, CA. Prepared for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation&lt;br /&gt;District.&lt;br /&gt;Lee, S.K., D. Freitag, C. Steinberg, A. Kettrup, and Y.H. Kim. 1993. Effects&lt;br /&gt;of dissolved humic materials on acute toxicity of some organic chemicals to&lt;br /&gt;aquatic organisms. Wat. Res. 27:199-204.&lt;br /&gt;Lehotay, S.J., J.A. Harman-Fetcho and L.L. McConnell. 1998. Agricultural&lt;br /&gt;pesticide residues in oysters and water from two Chesapeake Bay tributaries.&lt;br /&gt;Mar. Pollut. Bull. 37:32-44.&lt;br /&gt;Li, G.C. and C.Y. Chen. 1981. Study on the acute toxicities of commonly used&lt;br /&gt;pesticides to two kinds of fish. K'o Hsueh Fa Chan Yueh K'an 9:146-152.&lt;br /&gt;Lilly, J.H., S. Mohiyuddin, H.P. Prabhuswamy, J.C. Samuel and S.V.R. Shetty.&lt;br /&gt;1969. Effects of insecticide-treated rice plants and paddy water on vertebrate&lt;br /&gt;animals. Mysore J. Agr. Sci. 3:371-379.&lt;br /&gt;66&lt;br /&gt;Lowden, G.F., C.L. Saunders and R.W. Edwards. 1969. Organo-chlorine&lt;br /&gt;insecticides in water - Part II. Water Treat. Exam. 18:275-287.&lt;br /&gt;Macek, K.J. 1975. Acute toxicity of pesticide mixtures to bluegills. Bull.&lt;br /&gt;Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 14:648-652.&lt;br /&gt;Majewski, M.S., W.T. Foreman, D.A. Goolsby and N. Nakagaki. 1998. Airborne&lt;br /&gt;pesticide residues along the Mississippi River. Environ. Sci. Technol.&lt;br /&gt;32:3689-3698.&lt;br /&gt;Malone, C.R. and B.G. Blaylock. 1970. Toxicity of insecticide formulations to&lt;br /&gt;carp embryos reared in vitro. J. Wildl. Manage. 34:460-463.&lt;br /&gt;Mansour, M., E.A. Feicht, A. Behechti, K. Schramm and A. Kettrup. 1999.&lt;br /&gt;Determination photostability of selected agrochemicals in water and soil.&lt;br /&gt;Chemosphere. 39:575-585.&lt;br /&gt;Margot, A. and H. Gysin. 1957. Diazinon, seine zersetzungsprodukte und ihre&lt;br /&gt;eigenschaften. Helv. Chem. Acta. 40:1562-1573.&lt;br /&gt;Martinez-Toledo, M.V., V. Salmeron and J. Gonzalez-Lopez. 1993. Effects of&lt;br /&gt;diazinon and quinalphos on some functional groups of soil microflora. Toxicol.&lt;br /&gt;Environ. Chem. 37:165-172.&lt;br /&gt;Matsuo, K. and T. Tamura. 1970. Laboratory experiments on the effect of&lt;br /&gt;insecticides against blackfly larvae (Diptera: Simuliidae) and fishes. Sci.&lt;br /&gt;Pest Control 35:125-130.&lt;br /&gt;Mayer, F.L., Jr. 1987. Acute toxicity handbook of chemicals to estuarine&lt;br /&gt;organisms. EPA/600/8-87/017. 274 pp.&lt;br /&gt;Mayer, F.L., Jr. and M.R. Ellersieck. 1986. Manual of acute toxicity:&lt;br /&gt;interpretation and data base for 410 chemicals and 66 species of freshwater&lt;br /&gt;animals. Resource Publication No. 160, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,&lt;br /&gt;Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;Mazidji, C.N., B. Koopman, G. Bitton and G. Voiland. 1990. Use of Microtox®&lt;br /&gt;and Ceriodaphnia bioassays in wastewater fractionation. Toxic. Asses. 5:265-&lt;br /&gt;277.&lt;br /&gt;McConnell, L.L., J.S. LeNoir, S. Datta and J.N. Seiber. 1998. Wet deposition&lt;br /&gt;of current-use pesticides in the Sierra Nevada mountain range, California,&lt;br /&gt;USA. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17:1908-1916.&lt;br /&gt;McLeay, M.J. and K.J. Hall. 1999. Monitoring agricultural drainage ditches and&lt;br /&gt;the receiving water (Nicomekl River, Surrey, B.C.) for toxicity to&lt;br /&gt;Ceriodaphnia dubia and probable cause due to organophosphate contamination.&lt;br /&gt;Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 34:423-453.&lt;br /&gt;Medina, D., A. Prieto, G. Ettiene, I. Buscema and A. Abreu de V. 1999.&lt;br /&gt;Persistence of organophosphorus pesticide residues in Limon River waters.&lt;br /&gt;67&lt;br /&gt;Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 63: 39-44.&lt;br /&gt;Meier, E.P., W.H. Dennis, A.B. Rosencrance, W.F. Randall, W.J. Cooper and M.C.&lt;br /&gt;Warner. 1979. Sulfotepp, a toxic impurity in formulations of diazinon. Bull.&lt;br /&gt;Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 23:158-164.&lt;br /&gt;Miah, M.I., B.A. Bhuiya and K.C. Saha. 1995. Toxic effects of five&lt;br /&gt;organophosphorus insecticides on damselfly (Odenata: Zygoptera) larvae.&lt;br /&gt;Bangladesh J. Zool. 23:55-60.&lt;br /&gt;Miller, C.W., B.M. Zuckerman and A.J. Charig. 1966. Water translocation of&lt;br /&gt;diazinon-C14 and parathion-S35 off a model cranberry bog and subsequent&lt;br /&gt;occurrence in fish and mussels. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 95:345-349.&lt;br /&gt;Mitchell, D. 1985. Bioassay testing of herbicide H2 and insecticidal&lt;br /&gt;soap/diazinon with rainbow trout and Daphnia. U.S. Environmental Protection&lt;br /&gt;Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs registration standard.&lt;br /&gt;Mitsuhashi, J., T.D.C. Grace and D.F. Waterhouse. 1970. Effects of&lt;br /&gt;insecticides on cultures of insect cells. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 13:327-341.&lt;br /&gt;Moore, A. and C.P. Waring. 1996. Sublethal effects of the pesticide diazinon&lt;br /&gt;on olfactory function in mature male Atlantic salmon parr. J. Fish Biol.&lt;br /&gt;48:758-775.&lt;br /&gt;Morale, A., L. Coniglio, C. Angelini, G. Cimoli, A. Bolla, D. Alleteo, P.&lt;br /&gt;Russo and C. Falugi. 1998. Biological effects of a neurotoxic pesticide at low&lt;br /&gt;concentrations on sea urchin early development. A terathogenic assay.&lt;br /&gt;Chemosphere. 37:3001-3010.&lt;br /&gt;Morgan, H.G. 1976. Sublethal effects of diazinon in stream invertebrates.&lt;br /&gt;Ph.D. dissertation. NIG 2WI. Univ. of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. 157 pp.&lt;br /&gt;Mulla, M.S. 1963. Persistence of mosquito larvicides in water. Mosq. News&lt;br /&gt;23:234-237.&lt;br /&gt;Mulla, M.S., R.L. Metcalf and L.W. Isaak. 1962. Some new and highly effective&lt;br /&gt;mosquito larvicides. Mosq. News 22:231-238.&lt;br /&gt;Mulla, M.S., L.W. Isaak and H. Axelrod. 1963. Field studies on the effects of&lt;br /&gt;insecticides on some aquatic wildlife species. J. Econ. Entomol. 56:184-188.&lt;br /&gt;Murray, H.E. and R.K. Guthrie. 1980. Effects of carbaryl, diazinon and&lt;br /&gt;malathion on native aquatic populations of microorganisms. Bull. Environ.&lt;br /&gt;Contam. Toxicol. 24:535-542.&lt;br /&gt;Mustafa, M., F. Anjum and S.S.H. Qadri. 1982. A technique to evaluate acute&lt;br /&gt;toxicity of insecticide (technical and formulation) to fresh-water fish,&lt;br /&gt;Tilapia mossambica. Int. Pest. Cont. 24:90-92.&lt;br /&gt;NCTCOG. 1993. Storm water discharge characterization final summary report -&lt;br /&gt;68&lt;br /&gt;Task 2.0. North Central Texas Council of Governments, Camp, Dresser and&lt;br /&gt;McKee, Inc. and Alan Plummer and Associates, Inc.&lt;br /&gt;Niforos, J. and R.P. Lim. 1998. Toxicity of diazinon, an organophosphorus&lt;br /&gt;pesticide, to the eastern rainbow fish, Melanotaenia duboulayi. Verh.&lt;br /&gt;Internat. Verein. Limnol. 26:2296-2301.&lt;br /&gt;Nimmo, D.R., T.L. Hamaker, E. Matthews and J.C. Moore. 1981. An overview of&lt;br /&gt;the acute and chronic effects of first and second generation pesticides on an&lt;br /&gt;estuarine mysid. In: Biological monitoring of marine pollutants. F.J.&lt;br /&gt;Vernberg, A. Calabrese, F.P. Thurberg, and W.B. Vernberg (Eds.). Academic&lt;br /&gt;Press. pp. 3-19.&lt;br /&gt;Nishiuchi, Y. 1977. Toxicity of formulated pesticides to some freshwater&lt;br /&gt;organisms - XXXXI. Suisan Zoshoku 24:146-150.&lt;br /&gt;Nishiuchi, Y. and K. Asano. 1979. Toxicity of pesticides to some fresh water&lt;br /&gt;organisms - LIX. Suisan Zoshoku 27:48-55.&lt;br /&gt;Nishiuchi, Y. and K. Asano. 1981. Comparison of pesticide susceptibility of&lt;br /&gt;colored carp with Japanese common carp. Bull. Agric. Chem. Insp. Stn. 21:61-&lt;br /&gt;63.&lt;br /&gt;Nishiuchi, Y. and Y. Hashimoto. 1967. Toxicity of pesticide ingredients to&lt;br /&gt;some fresh water organisms. Sci. Pest Control 32:5-11.&lt;br /&gt;Nishiuchi, Y. and K. Yoshida. 1972. Toxicities of pesticides to some fresh&lt;br /&gt;water snails. Bull. Agric. Chem. Insp. Stn. 12:86-92.&lt;br /&gt;Norberg-King, T.J. 1987. U.S. EPA, Duluth, MN. (Memorandum to C. Stephan, U.S.&lt;br /&gt;EPA, Duluth, MN. August 31).&lt;br /&gt;Norberg-King, T.J. 1989. An evaluation of the fathead minnow seven-day&lt;br /&gt;subchronic test for estimating chronic toxicity. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.&lt;br /&gt;8:1075-1089.&lt;br /&gt;Norberg-King, T.J., M. Lukasewcyz and J. Jenson. 1989. Results of diazinon&lt;br /&gt;levels in POTW effluents in the United States. National Effluent Toxicity&lt;br /&gt;Assessment Center Technical Report 14-89. Environmental Laboratory - Duluth,&lt;br /&gt;MN. 20 pp.&lt;br /&gt;Norland, R.L., M.S. Mulla, F.W. Pelsue and T. Ikeshoji. 1974. Conventional and&lt;br /&gt;new insecticides for the control of chironomid midges. Proc. Am. Conf. Calif.&lt;br /&gt;Mosq. Cont. Assoc. 42:181-183.&lt;br /&gt;O'Kelley, J.C. and T.R. Deason. 1976. Degradation of pesticides by algae. PB-&lt;br /&gt;251 933 or EPA-600/3-76-022 National Technical Information Service,&lt;br /&gt;Springfield, VA.&lt;br /&gt;Oh, H.S., S.K. Lee, Y.H. Kim and J.K. Roh. 1991. Mechanisms of selective&lt;br /&gt;toxicity of diazinon to killifish (Oryzims latipes) and loach (Misgurnus&lt;br /&gt;69&lt;br /&gt;anguillicaudatus). In: Aquatic toxicology and risk assessment. Fourteenth&lt;br /&gt;Vol., ASTM STP 1124. M.A. Mayes &amp; M.G. Barrow (Eds.), American Society for&lt;br /&gt;Testing and Materials, Philadelphia. pp. 343-353.&lt;br /&gt;Ohayo-Mitoko, G.J.A. and J.W. Deneer. 1993. Lethal body burdens of four&lt;br /&gt;organophosphorus pesticides in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Sci. Total&lt;br /&gt;Environ. 1993 Supplement: 559-565.&lt;br /&gt;Olson, D.L. and G.M. Christensen. 1980. Effects of water pollutants and other&lt;br /&gt;chemicals on fish acetylcholinesterase (in vitro). Environ. Res. 21:327-335.&lt;br /&gt;Pan, G. and H.M. Dutta. 1998. The inhibition of brain acetylcholinesterase&lt;br /&gt;activity of juvenile largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides by sublethal&lt;br /&gt;concentrations of diazinon. Environ. Res. (Sec. A.) 79:133-137.&lt;br /&gt;Parkhurst, M.A., G. Whelan, Y. Onishi and A.R. Olsen. 1981. Simulation of the&lt;br /&gt;migration, fate, and effects of diazinon in two Monticello stream channels.&lt;br /&gt;Contract 2311104483. Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, prepared for&lt;br /&gt;U.S. Army Medical Bioengineering Laboratory.&lt;br /&gt;Phipps, G.L. 1988. U.S. EPA, Duluth, MN. (Memorandum to R. Spehar, U.S. EPA,&lt;br /&gt;Duluth, MN. April 29).&lt;br /&gt;Qadri, N. and H.M. Dutta. 1995. Long term effects of low and high&lt;br /&gt;concentrations of diazinon on bluegill fish, Lepomis macrochirus: A light&lt;br /&gt;microscopic study. Am. Zool. 35:144A.&lt;br /&gt;Qadri, S.S.H. and F. Anjum. 1982. Selective toxicity of organophosphorus and&lt;br /&gt;carbamate pesticides to honey bee and freshwater fish. Int. Pest. Cont.&lt;br /&gt;24:126.&lt;br /&gt;Rettich, F. 1977. The susceptibility of mosquito larvae to eighteen&lt;br /&gt;insecticides in Czechoslovakia. Mosq. News 37:252-257.&lt;br /&gt;Rettich, F. 1979. Laboratory and field investigations in Czechoslovakia with&lt;br /&gt;fanitrothion, pirimiphosmethyl, temephos and other organophosphorus larvicides&lt;br /&gt;applied as sprays for control of Culex pipiens molestus Forskal and Aedes&lt;br /&gt;cantans Meigen. Mosq. News 39:320-328.&lt;br /&gt;Ritter, W.F., H.P. Johnson, W.G. Lovely and M. Molnam. 1974. Atrazine,&lt;br /&gt;propachlor, and diazinon residues on small agricultural watershed. Environ.&lt;br /&gt;Sci. Technol. 8:38-42.&lt;br /&gt;Robertson, J.B. and C. Mazzella. 1989. Acute toxicity of the pesticide&lt;br /&gt;diazinon to the freshwater snail Gillia altilis. Bull. Environ. Contam.&lt;br /&gt;Toxicol. 42:320-324.&lt;br /&gt;Robinson, P.W. 1999. The toxicity of pesticides and organics to mysid shrimps&lt;br /&gt;can be predicted from Daphnia spp. toxicity data. Wat. Res. 33:1545-1549.&lt;br /&gt;70&lt;br /&gt;Roex, E.W.M., C.A.M. Van Gestel, A.P. Van Wezel and N.M. Van Straalen. 2000.&lt;br /&gt;Ratios between acute aquatic toxicity and effects on population growth rates&lt;br /&gt;in relation to toxicant mode of action. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19:685-693.&lt;br /&gt;Rogge, R.W. and C.D. Drewes. 1993. Assessing sublethal neurotoxicity effects&lt;br /&gt;in the freshwater oligochaete, Lumbriculus variegatus. Aquat. Toxicol. 26:73-&lt;br /&gt;90.&lt;br /&gt;Rompas, R.M., K. Kobayashi, Y. Oshima, N. Imada, K. Yamato and Y. Mitsuyasu.&lt;br /&gt;1989. Relationship between toxicity and acetylcholinesterase inhibition of&lt;br /&gt;some thiono- and oxy- form organophosphates in tiger shrimp larvae at&lt;br /&gt;different stages. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi. 55:669-673.&lt;br /&gt;Sakr, S.A. and S.A. Gabr. 1992. Ultrastructural changes induced by diazinon&lt;br /&gt;and neopybuthrin in skeletal muscles of Tilapia nilotica. Bull. Environ.&lt;br /&gt;Contam. Toxicol. 48:467-473.&lt;br /&gt;Sakr, S.A., S.A. Gabr and M.M. El-Saadany. 1991. Effect of diazinon on frezefracture&lt;br /&gt;images of microvilli of intestinal epithelial cells of Tilapia&lt;br /&gt;nilotica. Zeitschrift fur Ernahrungswissenschaft 30:268-275.&lt;br /&gt;Sanchez, M., M.D. Ferrando, E. Sancho and E. Andreu-Moliner. 1998. Evaluation&lt;br /&gt;of a Daphnia magna renewal life-cycle test method with diazinon. J. Environ.&lt;br /&gt;Sci. Health. B33:785-797.&lt;br /&gt;Sancho, E., M.D. Ferrando, E. Andreu and M. Gamon. 1992a. Acute toxicity&lt;br /&gt;uptake and clearance of diazinon by the European eel, Anguilla anguilla (L.).&lt;br /&gt;J. Environ. Sci. Health 27B: 209-221.&lt;br /&gt;Sancho, E., M.D. Ferrando, M. Gamon and E. Andreu-Moliner. 1992b.&lt;br /&gt;Organophosphorus diazinon induced toxicity in the fish Anguilla anguilla L.&lt;br /&gt;Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 103C:351-356.&lt;br /&gt;Sancho, E., M.D. Ferrando, E. Andreu and M. Gamon. 1993a. Bioconcentration and&lt;br /&gt;excretion of diazinon by eel. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 50:578-585.&lt;br /&gt;Sancho, E., M.D. Ferrando, M. Gamon and E. Andreu-Moliner. 1993b. An approach&lt;br /&gt;to the diazinon toxicity in the European eel: Bioaccumulation studies. Sci.&lt;br /&gt;Total Environ. (Supplement):461-468.&lt;br /&gt;Sancho, E., M.D. Ferrando, M. Gamon, and E. Andreu-Moliner. 1994. Uptake and&lt;br /&gt;clearance of diazinon in different tissues of the European eel ( Anguilla&lt;br /&gt;anguilla L.). Biomed. Environ. Sci. 7:41-49.&lt;br /&gt;Sanders, H.O. 1969. Toxicity of pesticides to the crustacean Gammarus&lt;br /&gt;lacustris. Tech. Paper No. 25, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington,&lt;br /&gt;D.C.&lt;br /&gt;Sanders, H.O. and O.B. Cope. 1966. Toxicities of several pesticides to two&lt;br /&gt;species of cladocerans. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 95:165-169.&lt;br /&gt;71&lt;br /&gt;Sanders, H.O. and O.B. Cope. 1968. The relative toxicities of several&lt;br /&gt;pesticides to naiads of three species of stoneflies. Limnol. Oceanogr. 13:112-&lt;br /&gt;117.&lt;br /&gt;Sastry, K.V. and P.V. Malik. 1982a. Histopathological and enzymological&lt;br /&gt;alterations in the digestive system of a freshwater teleost fish,&lt;br /&gt;Heteropneustes fossilis, exposed acutely and chronically to diazinon.&lt;br /&gt;Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 6:223-235.&lt;br /&gt;Sastry, K.V. and P.V. Malik. 1982b. Acute and chronic effects of diazinon on&lt;br /&gt;the activities of three dehydrogenases in the digestive system of a freshwater&lt;br /&gt;teleost fish Channa punctatus. Toxicol. Lett. 10:55-59.&lt;br /&gt;Sastry, K.V. and K. Sharma. 1980. Diazinon effect on the activities of brain&lt;br /&gt;enzymes from Ophiocephalus (Channa) punctatus. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.&lt;br /&gt;24:326-332.&lt;br /&gt;Sastry, K.V. and K. Sharma. 1981. Diazinon-induced histopathological and&lt;br /&gt;hemetological alterations in a freshwater teleost, Ophiocephalus punctatus.&lt;br /&gt;Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 5:329-340.&lt;br /&gt;Scheunert, I., M. Mansour, U. Dorfler and R. Schroll. 1993. Fate of&lt;br /&gt;perdimethalin, cartofuran and diazinon under abiotic and biotic conditions.&lt;br /&gt;Sci. Total Environ. 132:361-369.&lt;br /&gt;Seguchi, K. and S. Asaka. 1981. Intake and excretion of diazinon in freshwater&lt;br /&gt;fishes. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 27:244-249.&lt;br /&gt;Setakana, P. and K.N. Tan. 1991. Insecticide resistance and multi-resistance&lt;br /&gt;in two strains of Culex quinquefasciatus say larvae in Penang, Malaysia.&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito-Borne Dis. Bull. 8:40-44.&lt;br /&gt;Sethunathan, N. 1973. Microbial degradation of insecticides in flooded soil&lt;br /&gt;and in anaerobic cultures. Residue Rev. 47:143-166.&lt;br /&gt;Sethunathan, N. and I.C. MacRae. 1969. Some effects of diazinon on the&lt;br /&gt;microflora of submerged soils. Plant Soil 30:109-112.&lt;br /&gt;Sethunathan, N., and M.D. Pathak. 1972. Increased biological hydrolysis of&lt;br /&gt;diazinon after repeated application in rice paddies. J. Agric. Food Chem.&lt;br /&gt;20:586-689.&lt;br /&gt;Shacklock, P.F. and G.B. Croft. 1981. Effect of grazers on Chrondus crispus in&lt;br /&gt;culture. Aquaculture 22:331-342.&lt;br /&gt;Shigehisa, H. and H. Shiraishi. 1998. Biomonitoring with shrimp to detect&lt;br /&gt;seasonal change in river water toxicity. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17:687-694.&lt;br /&gt;Singh, P.K. 1973. Effect of pesticides on blue-green algae. Arch. Mikrobiol.&lt;br /&gt;89:317-320.&lt;br /&gt;72&lt;br /&gt;Singmaster, J.A. 1990. Old and nasty pesticides. Agrichemical Age. Aug/Sept:&lt;br /&gt;4.&lt;br /&gt;Sinha, P.K., S. Pal, K. Kumar, S.B. Triar, and R. Singh. 1987. Thiodicarb, an&lt;br /&gt;effective molluscicide for grazer snails of blue green algae. J. Entomol. Res.&lt;br /&gt;10:116-118.&lt;br /&gt;Snell, T.W. and B.D. Moffat. 1992. A 2-d life cycle test with the rotifer&lt;br /&gt;Brachionus calyciflorus. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 11:1249-1257.&lt;br /&gt;SOLARIS Consumer Affairs for Ortho Products. 1998. Personal communication.&lt;br /&gt;Soliman, S.A., G.W. Sovocool, A. Curley, N.S. Ahmed, S. El-Fiki and A.K. El-&lt;br /&gt;Sebae. 1982. Two acute human poisoning cases resulting from exposure to&lt;br /&gt;diazinon transformation products in Egypt. Arch. Environ. Health. 37:207-212.&lt;br /&gt;Stadnyk, L. and R.S. Campbell. 1971. Pesticide effect on growth and 14C&lt;br /&gt;assimilation in a freshwater alga. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 6:1-8.&lt;br /&gt;Steen R.J.C.A., P.E.G. Leonards, U.A.Th. Brinkman, D. Barcelo, J. Tronczynski,&lt;br /&gt;T.A. Albanis and W.P. Cofino. 1999. Ecological risk assessment of&lt;br /&gt;agrochemicals in European estuaries. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18:1574-1581.&lt;br /&gt;Steinberg, C.E.W., A. Sturm, J. Kelbel, S.K. Lee, N. Hertkorn, D. Freitag and&lt;br /&gt;A.A. Kettrup. 1992. Changes of acute toxicity of organic chemicals to Daphnia&lt;br /&gt;magna in the presence of dissolved humic material (DHM). Acta Hydrochim.&lt;br /&gt;Hydrobiol. 20:326-332.&lt;br /&gt;Steinberg, C.E.W., Y. Xu, S.K. Lee, D. Freitag, and A. Kettrup. 1993. Effect&lt;br /&gt;of dissolved humic material (DHM) on bioavailability of some organic&lt;br /&gt;xenobiotics to Daphnia magna. Chem. Spec. Bioavail. 5:1-9.&lt;br /&gt;Stephan, C.E., D.I. Mount, D.J. Hansen, J.H. Gentile, G.A. Chapman and W.A.&lt;br /&gt;Brungs. 1985. Guidelines for deriving numerical national water quality&lt;br /&gt;criteria for the protection of aquatic organisms and their uses. PB85-227049.&lt;br /&gt;National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.&lt;br /&gt;Stevens, M.M. 1991. Insecticide treatments used against a rice bloodworm,&lt;br /&gt;Chironomus tepperi (Diptera: Chironomidae): Toxicity and residual effects in&lt;br /&gt;water. J. Econ. Entomol. 84:795-800.&lt;br /&gt;Stevens, M.M. 1992. Toxicity of organophosphorus insecticides to fourth-instar&lt;br /&gt;larvae of Chironomus tepperi Skuse (Diptera: Chironomidae). J. Aust. Entomol.&lt;br /&gt;Soc. 31:335-337.&lt;br /&gt;Stevens, M.M. and G.N. Warren. 1992. Insecticide treatments used against a&lt;br /&gt;rice bloodworm, Chironomus tepperi (Diptera: Chironomidae): Suppression of&lt;br /&gt;larval populations. J. Econ. Entomol. 85:1606-1613.&lt;br /&gt;Stratton, G.W. and C.T. Corke. 1981. Interaction of permethrin with Daphnia&lt;br /&gt;magna in the presence and absence of particulate material. Environ. Pollut.&lt;br /&gt;(Series A) 24:135-144.&lt;br /&gt;73&lt;br /&gt;Stuijfzand, S.C., L. Poort, G.D. Greve, H.G. Van der Geest and M.H.S. Kraak.&lt;br /&gt;2000. Variables determining the impact of diazinon on aquatic insects: taxon,&lt;br /&gt;developmental stage, and exposure time. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19:582-587.&lt;br /&gt;Swedberg, D. 1973. Diazinon toxicity to specified fish. U.S. Environmental&lt;br /&gt;Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs registration standard.&lt;br /&gt;Thursby, G.B. and W.J. Berry. 1988. Acute toxicity of diazinon to saltwater&lt;br /&gt;animals. University of Rhode Island. (Memorandum to D.J. Hansen, U.S. EPA and&lt;br /&gt;K.J. Scott, Science Applications International Corporation April 29).&lt;br /&gt;Thursby, G.B. and M. Tagliabue. 1988. Effect of diazinon on sexual&lt;br /&gt;reproduction in Champia. University of Rhode Island (Memorandum to D.J.&lt;br /&gt;Hansen, U.S. EPA and K.J. Scott, Science Applications International&lt;br /&gt;Corporation July 6).&lt;br /&gt;Tripathi, G. 1992. Relative toxicity of aldrin, fenualerate, captan and&lt;br /&gt;diazinon to the freshwater food fish, Clarias batrachus. Biomed. Environ. Sci.&lt;br /&gt;5:33-38.&lt;br /&gt;Tsuda, T., S. Aoki, M. Kojima and H. Harada. 1989. Bioconcentration and&lt;br /&gt;excretion of diazinon, IBP, malathion and fenitrothion by willow shiner.&lt;br /&gt;Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 24:185-190.&lt;br /&gt;Tsuda, T., S. Aoki, M. Kojima and H. Harada. 1990. Bioconcentration and&lt;br /&gt;excretion of diazinon, IBP, malathion and fenitrothion by carp. 1990. Comp.&lt;br /&gt;Biochem. Physiol. 96C:23-26.&lt;br /&gt;Tsuda, T., S. Aoki, M. Kojima and T. Fujita. 1992. Pesticides in water and&lt;br /&gt;fish from rivers flowing into Lake Biwa (II). Chemosphere 24:1523-1531.&lt;br /&gt;Tsuda, T., S. Aoki, T. Inoue and M. Kojima. 1995a. Accumulation and excretion&lt;br /&gt;of diazinon, fenthion and fenitrothion by killifish: Comparison of individual&lt;br /&gt;and mixed pesticides. Water Res. 29:455-458.&lt;br /&gt;Tsuda, T., S. Aoki, T. Inoue and M. Kojima. 1995b. Accumulation of diazinon,&lt;br /&gt;fenthion and fenitrothion by killifish from mixtures of the three pesticides.&lt;br /&gt;Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 47:251-255.&lt;br /&gt;Tsuda, T., M. Kojima, H. Harada, A. Nakajima and S. Aoki. 1997a. Acute&lt;br /&gt;toxicity, accumulation and excretion of organophosphorous insecticides and&lt;br /&gt;their oxidation products in killifish. Chemosphere. 35:939-949.&lt;br /&gt;Tsuda, T., M. Kojima, H. Harada, A. Nakajima and S. Aoki. 1997b. Relationships&lt;br /&gt;of bioconcentration factors of organophosphate pesticides among species of&lt;br /&gt;fish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 116:213-218.&lt;br /&gt;U.S. EPA. 1983a. Water quality standards regulation. Federal Register&lt;br /&gt;74&lt;br /&gt;48:51400-51413. November 8.&lt;br /&gt;U.S. EPA. 1983b. Water quality standards handbook. Office of Water Regulations&lt;br /&gt;and Standards, Washington, DC.&lt;br /&gt;U.S. EPA. 1985. Appendix B - Response to public comments on "Guidelines for&lt;br /&gt;deriving numerical national water quality criteria for the protection of&lt;br /&gt;aquatic organisms and their uses." Federal Register 50:30793-30796. July 29.&lt;br /&gt;U.S. EPA 1986. Chapter I - Stream design flow for steady-state modeling. In:&lt;br /&gt;Book VI - Design conditions. In: Technical guidance manual for performing&lt;br /&gt;waste load allocation. Office of Water, Washington, DC. August.&lt;br /&gt;U.S. EPA. 1987. Permit writers guide to water quality-based permitting for&lt;br /&gt;toxic pollutants. EPA-440/4-87-005. Office of Water, Washington, DC.&lt;br /&gt;U.S. EPA. 1991. Technical support document for water quality-based toxics&lt;br /&gt;control. EPA-505/2-90-001, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;U.S. EPA. 1994. Water quality standards handbook: 2nd ed. EPA-823-B-94-005a,b.&lt;br /&gt;Washington, DC.&lt;br /&gt;University of Wisconsin-Superior. 1988. Acute toxicities of organic chemicals&lt;br /&gt;to fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). Vol. 4. Geiger, D.L., D.J. Call and&lt;br /&gt;L.T. Brooke (Eds.). Center for Lake Superior Environmental Studies, University&lt;br /&gt;of Wisconsin-Superior Press, Superior, WI 54880. 355 pp.&lt;br /&gt;Uno, S., H. Shiraishi, S. Hatakeyama and A. Otsuki. 1997. Uptake and&lt;br /&gt;depuration kinetics and BCFs of several pesticides in three species of&lt;br /&gt;shellfish (Corbicula leana, Corbicula japonica, and Cipangopludina chinensis):&lt;br /&gt;Comparison between field and laboratory experiment. Aquat. Toxicol. 39:23-43.&lt;br /&gt;Van Der Geest, H.G., S.C. Stuijfzand, M.H.S. Kraak and W. Admiraal. 1997.&lt;br /&gt;Impact of a diazinon calamity in 1996 on the aquatic macroinvertebrates in the&lt;br /&gt;River Meuse, the Netherlands. Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol. 30:327-330.&lt;br /&gt;Van Der Geest, H.G., G.D. Greve, E.M. De Haas, B.B. Scheper, M.H.S. Kraak,&lt;br /&gt;S.C. Stuijfzand, K.H. Augustijn and W. Admiraal. 1999. Survival and behavioral&lt;br /&gt;responses of larvae of the caddisfly Hydropsyche angustipennis to copper and&lt;br /&gt;diazinon. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18:1965-1971.&lt;br /&gt;Verma, S.R., S.K. Bansal, A.K. Gupta, N. Pal, A.K. Tyagi, M.C. Bhatnagar, V.&lt;br /&gt;Kumar and R.C. Dalela. 1982. Bioassay trials with twenty-three pesticides to a&lt;br /&gt;fresh water teleost, Saccobranchus fossilis. Water Res. 16:525-529.&lt;br /&gt;Verschueren, K. 1983. Handbook of environmental data on organic chemicals. 2nd&lt;br /&gt;ed. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, NY.&lt;br /&gt;Vigfusson, N.V., E.R. Vyse, C.A. Pernsteiner and R.J. Dawson. 1983. In vivo&lt;br /&gt;induction of sister-chromatid exchange in Umbra limi by the insecticides&lt;br /&gt;75&lt;br /&gt;endrin, chlordane, diazinon and guthion. Mutat. Res. 118:61-68.&lt;br /&gt;Vighi, M. and D. Calamari. 1987. A triparametric equation to describe QSARs&lt;br /&gt;for heterogeneous chemical substances. Chemosphere 16:1043-1051.&lt;br /&gt;Vilkas, A. 1976. Acute toxicity of diazinon technical to the water flea,&lt;br /&gt;Daphnia magna Straus. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of&lt;br /&gt;Pesticide Programs registration standard.&lt;br /&gt;Villarosa, L., M.J. Mcormick, P.D. Carpenter and P.J. Marriott. 1994.&lt;br /&gt;Determination of trace levels of diazinon and propetamphos in water and sewage&lt;br /&gt;by solid phase extraction. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 54:93-103.&lt;br /&gt;Virtue, W.A. and J.W. Clayton. 1997. Sheep dip chemicals and water pollution.&lt;br /&gt;Sci. Total Environ. 194-195:207-217.&lt;br /&gt;Vittozzi, L. and G. DeAngelis. 1991. A critical review of comparative acute&lt;br /&gt;toxicity data on freshwater fish. Aquat. Toxicol. 19:167-204.&lt;br /&gt;Waller, W.T., M.F. Acevedo, E.L. Morgan, K.L. Dickson, J.H. Kennedy, L.P.&lt;br /&gt;Ammann, H.J. Allen and P.R. Keating. 1995. Biological and chemical testing in&lt;br /&gt;storm water. Proceedings of Storm water NPDES Related Monitoring Needs.&lt;br /&gt;Engineering Foundation Conference, Crested Butte, CO, American Society of&lt;br /&gt;Civil Engineers, N.Y., N.Y. 676pp.&lt;br /&gt;Wauchope, R.D. 1978. The pesticide content of surface water draining from&lt;br /&gt;agricultural fields - a review. J. Environ. Qual. 7:459-472.&lt;br /&gt;Weiss, C.M. 1959. Stream pollution: Response of fish to sub-lethal exposures&lt;br /&gt;of organic phosphorus insecticides. Sewage Ind. Wastes 31:580-593.&lt;br /&gt;Weiss, C.M. 1961. Physiological effect of organic phosphorus insecticides on&lt;br /&gt;several species of fish. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 90:143-152.&lt;br /&gt;Weiss, C.M. and J.H. Gakstatter. 1964. Detection of pesticides in water by&lt;br /&gt;biochemical assay. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 36:240-253.&lt;br /&gt;Werner, I. and R. Nagel. 1997. Stress proteins HSP60 and HSP70 in three&lt;br /&gt;species of amphipods exposed to cadmium, diazinon, dieldrin and fluoranthene.&lt;br /&gt;Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16:2392-2403.&lt;br /&gt;Werner, I., L.A. Deanovic, V. Connor, V. De Vlaming, J.C. Bailey and D.E.&lt;br /&gt;Hinton. 2000. Insecticide-caused toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia (Cladocera) in&lt;br /&gt;the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, California, USA. Environ. Toxicol.&lt;br /&gt;Chem. 19:215-227.&lt;br /&gt;Whitmore, D.H., Jr. and D.H. Hodges, Jr. 1978. In vitro pesticide inhibition&lt;br /&gt;of muscle esterases of the mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis. Comp. Biochem.&lt;br /&gt;Physiol. 59C:145-149.&lt;br /&gt;76&lt;br /&gt;WHO. 1998. Environmental Health Criteria, 198 - Diazinon. International&lt;br /&gt;Programme on Chemical Safety. World Health Organization. Geneva. 140pp.&lt;br /&gt;Williams, R.L. 1989. Uptake kinetics and toxicity of diazinon in the American&lt;br /&gt;oyster, Crassostrea virginica Gmelin. Ph.D. thesis. The College of William and&lt;br /&gt;Mary, Williamsburg, VA. 108 pp.&lt;br /&gt;Wong, C.K. 1997. Effects of diazinon on some population parameters of Moina&lt;br /&gt;macrocopa (Cladocera). Water Air Soil Pollut. 39:393-399.&lt;br /&gt;Wong, P.K. and L. Chang. 1988. The effects of 2,4-D herbicide and&lt;br /&gt;organophosphorus insecticides on growth, photosynthesis, and chlorophyll a&lt;br /&gt;synthesis of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (mt+). Environ. Pollut. 55:179-189.&lt;br /&gt;Worthley, E.G. and C.D. Schott. 1971. The comparative effects of CS and&lt;br /&gt;various pollutants on fresh water phytoplankton colonies of Wolffia papulifera&lt;br /&gt;Thompson. EATR 4595 or AD-736336. National Technical Information Service,&lt;br /&gt;Springfield, VA.&lt;br /&gt;Yasuno, M. and V. Kerdpibule. 1967. Susceptibility of larvae of Culex pipiens&lt;br /&gt;fatigans to organophosphorus insecticides in Thailand. Jpn. J. Exp. Med.&lt;br /&gt;37:559-562.&lt;br /&gt;Yasuno, M., S. Hirakoso, M. Sasa and M. Uchida. 1965. Inactivation of some&lt;br /&gt;organophosphorus insecticides by bacteria in polluted water. Japan. J. Exp.&lt;br /&gt;Med. 35:545-563.&lt;br /&gt;Yasutomi, K. and M. Takahashi. 1987. Insecticidal resistance of Culex&lt;br /&gt;tritaeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Japan: A country-wide survey of&lt;br /&gt;resistance to insecticides. J. Med. Ent. 24:604-608.&lt;br /&gt;Yoshioka, Y., T. Mizuno and T. Sato. 1986. The estimation for toxicity of&lt;br /&gt;chemicals on fish by physico-chemical properties. Chemosphere 15:195-203.&lt;br /&gt;Zaroogian, G.E., J.F. Heltshe and M. Johnson. 1985a. Estimation of toxicity to&lt;br /&gt;marine species with structure-activity models developed to estimate toxicity&lt;br /&gt;to freshwater fish. Aquat. Toxicol. 6:251-270.&lt;br /&gt;Zaroogian, G.E., J.F. Heltshe and M. Johnson. 1985b. Estimation of&lt;br /&gt;bioconcentration in marine species using structure-activity models. Environ.&lt;br /&gt;Toxicol. Chem. 4:3-12.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3537661746273509063-7317256750802431660?l=trashinyourbackyard-photobill.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://trashinyourbackyard-photobill.blogspot.com/feeds/7317256750802431660/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3537661746273509063&amp;postID=7317256750802431660' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3537661746273509063/posts/default/7317256750802431660'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3537661746273509063/posts/default/7317256750802431660'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trashinyourbackyard-photobill.blogspot.com/2008/02/diazinon-it-every-where-decaying-leaves.html' title='DIAZINON, It&apos;s every where decaying leaves and trees and grass clippings are:'/><author><name>photobill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06302363142207402191</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
